Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 388
Default Usenet downloads: USS Toledo (SSN 769) 060117 N 3541A 003.jpg 367209 bytes


Not my pictures, but interesting. Enjoy!

I know I am over my posting quota for today but these are the
last of my selection of downloads to share with this NG. If this
kind of pictures are interesting to readers here, I can cull out
more in future.


--
HP, aka Jerry

"And, that's all I'm going to say about that" - Forrest Gump



Attached Thumbnails
Usenet downloads: USS Toledo (SSN 769) 060117 N 3541A 003.jpg 367209 bytes-uss-toledo-ssn-769-060117-n-3541a-003.jpg  
  #2   Report Post  
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 36
Default Usenet downloads: USS Toledo (SSN 769) 060117 N 3541A 003.jpg 367209 bytes

When this sub came into Kings Bay for supplies, I got lucky and got
a tour of it. Real impressive and it's a lot bigger that it looks.

wizofwas


  #3   Report Post  
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 129
Default Usenet downloads: USS Toledo (SSN 769) 060117 N 3541A 003.jpg 367209 bytes

wizofwas added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

When this sub came into Kings Bay for supplies, I got lucky and got
a tour of it. Real impressive and it's a lot bigger that it looks.

Really?! Sounds great. I've toured a number of WWII fleet subs,
including one that was docked on the Detroit River still commisioned
when I was a boy but I've never been fortunate enough to tour a
nuclear sub of any kind. I imagine that while they're still cramped
they're nothing like the little tin cans 110 or so officers and men
went to see in during the war. And, there's only a couple of heads
for all those guys and they had to hot-bunk!

--
HP, aka Jerry

"And, that's all I'm going to say about that" - Forrest Gump


  #4   Report Post  
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 36
Default Usenet downloads: USS Toledo (SSN 769) 060117 N 3541A 003.jpg 367209 bytes


"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
wizofwas added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

When this sub came into Kings Bay for supplies, I got lucky and got
a tour of it. Real impressive and it's a lot bigger that it looks.

Really?! Sounds great. I've toured a number of WWII fleet subs,
including one that was docked on the Detroit River still commisioned
when I was a boy but I've never been fortunate enough to tour a
nuclear sub of any kind. I imagine that while they're still cramped
they're nothing like the little tin cans 110 or so officers and men
went to see in during the war. And, there's only a couple of heads
for all those guys and they had to hot-bunk!

Still "Hot Bunking" and I don't remember how many heads they
had. The new crew members have the privilege of sleeping on
top of the torpedoes. But at least they can shower everyday.
Which is nice, because it's 3 months out to sea (that's about
all of the food that they can carry) and rarely surface. I also
got to tour a "Boomer" at the same time. That's a lot bigger
sub. And it NEVER surfaces once out to sea. Never had a
chance to get on a WWII sub, but I can imagine how small
they are.

wizofwas


  #5   Report Post  
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
Default Usenet downloads: USS Toledo (SSN 769) 060117 N 3541A 003.jpg 367209 bytes

When I served on a Sturgeon (ssn680 nuclear fast attack, they are all
gone now) no one had to hot bunk. Sometimes but only when we had extra
people on board a few people would have to sleep on top of torpedos.
I visited a ww2 boat and they are actually more roomy inside because
they have considerabily less equipment than a modern day nuke boat.



On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:44:35 -0400, "wizofwas"
wrote:


"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
wizofwas added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

When this sub came into Kings Bay for supplies, I got lucky and got
a tour of it. Real impressive and it's a lot bigger that it looks.

Really?! Sounds great. I've toured a number of WWII fleet subs,
including one that was docked on the Detroit River still commisioned
when I was a boy but I've never been fortunate enough to tour a
nuclear sub of any kind. I imagine that while they're still cramped
they're nothing like the little tin cans 110 or so officers and men
went to see in during the war. And, there's only a couple of heads
for all those guys and they had to hot-bunk!

Still "Hot Bunking" and I don't remember how many heads they
had. The new crew members have the privilege of sleeping on
top of the torpedoes. But at least they can shower everyday.
Which is nice, because it's 3 months out to sea (that's about
all of the food that they can carry) and rarely surface. I also
got to tour a "Boomer" at the same time. That's a lot bigger
sub. And it NEVER surfaces once out to sea. Never had a
chance to get on a WWII sub, but I can imagine how small
they are.

wizofwas




  #6   Report Post  
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 129
Default Usenet downloads: USS Toledo (SSN 769) 060117 N 3541A 003.jpg 367209 bytes

www.mqultra.com/ssn680.html added these comments in the current
discussion du jour ...

When I served on a Sturgeon (ssn680 nuclear fast attack, they
are all gone now) no one had to hot bunk. Sometimes but only
when we had extra people on board a few people would have to
sleep on top of torpedos. I visited a ww2 boat and they are
actually more roomy inside because they have considerabily less
equipment than a modern day nuke boat.

You would certainly know more than me. All I can say is that is is
TOUGH for me to get around being I'm 6'4" and those watertight
doors are pretty damn small as are the bunks! And, as I recall, a
number of sailors had to sleep on top the torpedos of the WWII
subs.

When this sub came into Kings Bay for supplies, I got lucky
and got a tour of it. Real impressive and it's a lot bigger
that it looks.

Really?! Sounds great. I've toured a number of WWII fleet subs,
including one that was docked on the Detroit River still
commisioned when I was a boy but I've never been fortunate
enough to tour a nuclear sub of any kind. I imagine that while
they're still cramped they're nothing like the little tin cans
110 or so officers and men went to see in during the war. And,
there's only a couple of heads for all those guys and they had
to hot-bunk!

Still "Hot Bunking" and I don't remember how many heads they
had. The new crew members have the privilege of sleeping on
top of the torpedoes. But at least they can shower everyday.
Which is nice, because it's 3 months out to sea (that's about
all of the food that they can carry) and rarely surface. I also
got to tour a "Boomer" at the same time. That's a lot bigger
sub. And it NEVER surfaces once out to sea. Never had a
chance to get on a WWII sub, but I can imagine how small
they are.



--
HP, aka Jerry

"And, that's all I'm going to say about that" - Forrest Gump


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Usenet downloads: USS Norfolk (SSN 714) 060117 N 5863B 140.jpg 280556 bytes HEMI-Powered@[email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 March 29th 08 12:26 PM
Usenet downloads: HMS Rodney 1.jpg 74516 bytes HEMI-Powered@[email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 March 24th 08 01:08 AM
Usenet downloads: HMS Rodney 1.jpg 74516 bytes HEMI-Powered@[email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 March 23rd 08 09:28 PM
Usenet downloads: HMS Indomitable.jpg 101087 bytes HEMI-Powered@[email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 March 23rd 08 09:28 PM
Usenet downloads: HMS Hood.jpg 230345 bytes HEMI-Powered@[email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 March 23rd 08 09:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017