Casco Bay, Maine

On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 18:12:23 -0500, "MWB" wrote:

Casco Bay, Maine
I wonder if it is the fault of Live mail you post with that gives a
size of 639 eg, and actually it is much much more when downloaded. Am
I the only one to notice or is it a thing for all.

On 03/12/2011 23:30, joevan wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 18:12:23 -0500, wrote:

Casco Bay, Maine
I wonder if it is the fault of Live mail you post with that gives a
size of 639 eg, and actually it is much much more when downloaded. Am
I the only one to notice or is it a thing for all.

Using Thunderbird and posting an image of 304kb and sized 1024x768x24,
this shows up as 5,840 "lines".

The Maria Rose shot is 964kb and a size of 2857x2265x24, and shows up as
17,532 "lines", which is rather large.

--
Moving things in still pictures

On 04/12/2011 16:07, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 03/12/2011 23:30, joevan wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 18:12:23 -0500, wrote:

Casco Bay, Maine
I wonder if it is the fault of Live mail you post with that gives a
size of 639 eg, and actually it is much much more when downloaded. Am
I the only one to notice or is it a thing for all.

Using Thunderbird and posting an image of 304kb and sized 1024x768x24,
this shows up as 5,840 "lines".

The Maria Rose shot is 964kb and a size of 2857x2265x24, and shows up as
17,532 "lines", which is rather large.


Reducing that image to 220kb and dimensions of 1024x682x24 gives the
attached. I can't tell the number of lines until it's published. but you
should see the difference at your end.

--
Moving things in still pictures

I cropped this photo and reduced the quality to 90%.

I'll repost the entire photo.


Mark

Ooops

On 04/12/2011 16:58, MWB wrote:


Ooops


LOL.

--
Moving things in still pictures

On 04/12/2011 17:14, MWB wrote:


Ah, that's the way to do it!

--
Moving things in still pictures