| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
|
|||
|
|||
?
|
|
#2
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb
wrote: That's the Cole I think. |
|
#3
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
"joevan" schreef in bericht ... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb wrote: That's the Cole I think. I'm sure it is, found the picture on Google. -- Greetings Bouler (The Netherlands) |
|
#4
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
joevan wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb wrote: That's the Cole I think. I thought so too, but nothing to prove it. |
|
#5
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:08 -0500, cavelamb
wrote: I posted this a few days ago, I guess you missed it. joevan wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb wrote: That's the Cole I think. I thought so too, but nothing to prove it. Great post. Thanks. This one is especially poignant. That is to say 122491. And the Cole is 122806. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing enough said. |
|
#6
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:08 -0500, cavelamb
wrote: I posted this a few days ago, I guess you missed it. joevan wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb wrote: That's the Cole I think. I thought so too, but nothing to prove it. Great post. Thanks. This one is especially poignant. That is to say 122491. And the Cole is 122806. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing enough said. |
|
#7
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
"joevan" schreef in bericht ... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb wrote: That's the Cole I think. I'm sure it is, found the picture on Google. -- Greetings Bouler (The Netherlands) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
