?
 

?
 

On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:

That's the Cole I think.

?
 

"joevan" schreef in bericht
...
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:

That's the Cole I think.

I'm sure it is, found the picture on Google.
--
Greetings
Bouler (The Netherlands)

?
 

"joevan" schreef in bericht
...
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:

That's the Cole I think.

I'm sure it is, found the picture on Google.
--
Greetings
Bouler (The Netherlands)

?
 

joevan wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:

That's the Cole I think.

I thought so too, but nothing to prove it.

?
 

On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:08 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:
I posted this a few days ago, I guess you missed it.
joevan wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:

That's the Cole I think.

I thought so too, but nothing to prove it.
Great post. Thanks. This one is especially poignant.
That is to say 122491.
And the Cole is 122806.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing
enough said.

?
 

On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:08 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:
I posted this a few days ago, I guess you missed it.
joevan wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:19:31 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:

That's the Cole I think.

I thought so too, but nothing to prove it.
Great post. Thanks. This one is especially poignant.
That is to say 122491.
And the Cole is 122806.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing
enough said.