Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 11, 6:38 pm, BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. But what else might once expect from someone who believes in Sarah (Call me Rogue) Palin. You didn't answer my question. "Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. When Obama starts to circumvent the Constitution will your direct your acid tongue his way." Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? I don't see that happening to any significant degree. OBama will be less abusive of power than the current occupant. Care to make a wager? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 11, 6:38 pm, BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. But what else might once expect from someone who believes in Sarah (Call me Rogue) Palin. You didn't answer my question. "Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. When Obama starts to circumvent the Constitution will your direct your acid tongue his way." Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? I don't see that happening to any significant degree. OBama will be less abusive of power than the current occupant. Care to make a wager? On what basis? What's your benchmark? The patriot act? The signing statements? The suspension of habeas? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?" | General | |||
"Jeffrey Boyd" is an anagram of "Midget Runt" in Japanese | ASA | |||
Battery with "Double the Power" or that takes up "Half the Space" | ASA | |||
Marinco 15 Amp "Marine Grade" 120VAC Receptical v. Leviton "terrestrial grade" | Boat Building |