|
Dems owe me
Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000.
I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. If you voted Dem, you pay. The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. |
Dems owe me
|
Dems owe me
wrote in message ... Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000. I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. If you voted Dem, you pay. The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. I wish it was only 85K. |
Dems owe me
|
Dems owe me
On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:58:20 -0500, Jim wrote:
wrote: Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000. I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. If you voted Dem, you pay. The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. I feel your pain. No pain, no gain. :) |
Dems owe me
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:30:46 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote: wrote in message ... Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000. I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. If you voted Dem, you pay. The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. I wish it was only 85K. Back when CDOs were all the rage, the guy who handles our accounts sent me a prospectus on a CDO he was organizing for some of his local clients. I looked through the document - 32 pages long, full of lawyer speak, blah, blah, blah, but I liked the whole concept of spreading the risk around and what not. I was a little bothered about the whole sub-prime thing as I couldn't understand how spreading the risk kept people with no skin in the game, no document mortgages, etc., was a good bet even with spreading the risk around. But hey - he's a numbers guy (different kind of numbers), so we talked it over and put a small number into the security along with a few other folks. And it did pretty well, but I was still suspicious because I just couldn't wrap my mind around the whole concept of something for nothing with no chicks for free. A month later, he sends me another prospectus - CDO squared - this sucker is 276 pages long and complex as all hell. I looked it over until my eyes crossed and took a pass - told him I'd wait to see how the original investment worked out before jumping in. Then I saw the CDO cubed which was 730 pages long and promptly sold our interest in the original CDO at cost - I knew this was going to blow up and it did. TANSTAAFL dude. :) |
Dems owe me
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Eisboch |
Dems owe me
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:27:21 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Good point. And I apologize for the stupid comment. Uncalled for. |
Dems owe me
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. Cash dude - been saying that for years - in fact, since 2004. Haven't lost a thing because I recognized the bubble and kept my powder dry. Another couple of months, I'm ready to get back in. Except the 2% LOST to inflation every year. or about 100/1000 over the four years. With the twit going to be in the White House expect that to double hopefully not the double digit inflation during the Carter years. |
Dems owe me
On Nov 5, 9:34*pm, wrote:
Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000. I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. *DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. *I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. *If you voted Dem, you pay. *The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. *I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. Hold up! What about the Republican mantra of don't interfere with my possessions? Just how did the "dems" control your finances? You could do anything you wanted with the money. Just because you chose to risk it for a higher yield isn't anyone's fault but yours. |
Dems owe me
On Nov 6, 6:02*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. Cash dude - been saying that for years - in fact, since 2004. Haven't lost a thing because I recognized the bubble and kept my powder dry. Another couple of months, I'm ready to get back in. Amen, brother! |
Dems owe me
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... wrote in message ... Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000. I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. If you voted Dem, you pay. The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. I wish it was only 85K. Ditto. This sucks. |
Dems owe me
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Eisboch Only to a point. Last April I bailed off the US markets but keep to much in the foreign markets. I had the right idea, but underestimated the depth of this one. Still, not hurting as bad as many. I don't see a domestic buying opportunity, I suspect this depression of stocks is going to be with us for some time to come. |
Dems owe me
"Keith nuttle" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. Cash dude - been saying that for years - in fact, since 2004. Haven't lost a thing because I recognized the bubble and kept my powder dry. Another couple of months, I'm ready to get back in. Except the 2% LOST to inflation every year. or about 100/1000 over the four years. With the twit going to be in the White House expect that to double hopefully not the double digit inflation during the Carter years. Good point, as I am at about 2005 valuations, at least I got more than 1% return using Jan 2005 as a base. And in the bank, you might not get your money. The last place to put it is the bank, find a brokerage account where the broker does not do loans, mortgages and the like. |
Dems owe me
"Jim" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:58:20 -0500, Jim wrote: wrote: Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000. I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. If you voted Dem, you pay. The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. I feel your pain. No pain, no gain. :) Not worried about gain just yet. Recovered over 20k the past 7 days. That's a start. My foreign holdings are up. US Domestic is shot to hell. |
Dems owe me
Canuck57 wrote:
"Keith nuttle" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. Cash dude - been saying that for years - in fact, since 2004. Haven't lost a thing because I recognized the bubble and kept my powder dry. Another couple of months, I'm ready to get back in. Except the 2% LOST to inflation every year. or about 100/1000 over the four years. With the twit going to be in the White House expect that to double hopefully not the double digit inflation during the Carter years. Good point, as I am at about 2005 valuations, at least I got more than 1% return using Jan 2005 as a base. And in the bank, you might not get your money. The last place to put it is the bank, find a brokerage account where the broker does not do loans, mortgages and the like. Please explain. I think you got it backwards. |
Dems owe me
wrote in message ... On Nov 5, 9:34 pm, wrote: Got my financial reports on my investments today, lost nearly $85,000. I have always been fiscally responsible, never carry any cc balance, live within my means, save for retirement, dont own an expensive house, etc. So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy. DEMS OWE ME BIG MONEY. I figure I have paid my share of the national debt, Dems can all pay the rest. If you voted Dem, you pay. The market isnt coming back any time soon because nobody in their right mind would invest knowing the crooks now control the economy. I dun paid my part of the debt, so if you voted Dem, pay up cuz YOU caused the problem. Hold up! What about the Republican mantra of don't interfere with my possessions? Just how did the "dems" control your finances? You could do anything you wanted with the money. Just because you chose to risk it for a higher yield isn't anyone's fault but yours. ---- Everyone is entitled to their own I privately manage my own portfolio and in any 2 year cycle (except for 2008) I have beat bank returns by at least twice the amount, often 5 times! Over time that adds up nice. But I don't own a single bond or mutual fund. Been this way for over 15 years. 2004/2005 was obscene, I make far more than was lost in this year. And I don't subscribe to buy and hold. The longest stock I have is just 4 years old. Mutual funds and large investment houses are at a disadvantage, they can't get in, do the high and dump as I can. Often I only trade 1000 shares, but they need to do a million or more. I call it the small investors hands on advantage. Heavy in cash right now, have been since April but have bought about 5 recently. One is down 5%, 2 went sideways and 2 put on 25% so far. At least one I am going to sell as it is ultra short term. |
Dems owe me
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Eisboch Only to a point. Last April I bailed off the US markets but keep to much in the foreign markets. I had the right idea, but underestimated the depth of this one. Still, not hurting as bad as many. I don't see a domestic buying opportunity, I suspect this depression of stocks is going to be with us for some time to come. You might want to read this: http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/arti...einvest/118916 Eisboch |
Dems owe me
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:16:57 -0500, wrote:
Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. Getting in your excuses early? Stick with what's on your pedo mind. -- John H *Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!* |
Dems owe me
On Nov 6, 9:30 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message m... "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in messagenews:ofj5h41uc5ji8khccpgaa15ti22hkli31t@4ax .com... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Eisboch Only to a point. Last April I bailed off the US markets but keep to much in the foreign markets. I had the right idea, but underestimated the depth of this one. Still, not hurting as bad as many. I don't see a domestic buying opportunity, I suspect this depression of stocks is going to be with us for some time to come. You might want to read this: http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/arti...einvest/118916 Eisboch I do not expect the real value of the market to significantly increase in the next 4 years because the crooks who caused the problem are now firmly entrenched in congress and nobody in their right mind would invest in mutual funds, etc under that condition. Specific stocks may go up but funds that are arranged to minimize risk will not. Furthermore, I have realized that a traditional IRA is not a good deal for me because I expect to still be working at age 70 and to still be in a high tax bracket so there is no tax savings at all. |
Dems owe me
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:10:06 GMT, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:16:57 -0500, wrote: Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. Getting in your excuses early? Stick with what's on your pedo mind. You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. Your thoughts mimic Krause's. Are you related? Unions, regulation, taxes, un-motivated, expensive, work forces, greed and corruption. Killed our industrial complex. Granted, there were republicans and democrats who were involved. |
Dems owe me
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:35:34 -0500, Jim wrote: wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:10:06 GMT, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:16:57 -0500, wrote: Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. Getting in your excuses early? Stick with what's on your pedo mind. You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. Your thoughts mimic Krause's. Are you related? Now there's a strong rebuttal! Unions, regulation, taxes, un-motivated, expensive, work forces, greed and corruption. Killed our industrial complex. Granted, there were republicans and democrats who were involved. So, you can't directly address what I said, either, without admitting that it's true. Got it! Why bother. You are just regurgitating crap that Harry has been drooling. It's not democrat vs republican that's the problem. It's liberal vs conservative that can't settle on a happy medium. Everyone wants to satisfy their own needs and wants. Nobody gives a **** about "Country". Forget the "got it". It makes you sound like the asshole JimH. |
Dems owe me
wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch |
Dems owe me
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch You show such great restraint. ;-) |
Dems owe me
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch You show such great restraint. ;-) Oh, I am expecting a scolding at any moment now. Eisboch |
Dems owe me
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:21:11 -0500, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:10:06 GMT, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:16:57 -0500, wrote: Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. Getting in your excuses early? Stick with what's on your pedo mind. You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. I snipped what you wrote because your mind is in a pedophile gutter. -- John H *Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!* |
Dems owe me
"Jim" wrote in message ... snip... Unions, regulation, taxes, un-motivated, expensive, work forces, greed and corruption. Killed our industrial complex. Granted, there were republicans and democrats who were involved. Unions?? Only a small fraction of the US workforce is unionized, yet clowns like you still blame them for your situation. Wake up & blame the greedy *******s who run the companies. |
Dems owe me
Eisboch wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch You show such great restraint. ;-) Oh, I am expecting a scolding at any moment now. Eisboch Remain unprovoked. :-) |
Dems owe me
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:02:48 -0500, Jim wrote: wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:35:34 -0500, Jim wrote: wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:10:06 GMT, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:16:57 -0500, wrote: Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. Getting in your excuses early? Stick with what's on your pedo mind. You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. Your thoughts mimic Krause's. Are you related? Now there's a strong rebuttal! Unions, regulation, taxes, un-motivated, expensive, work forces, greed and corruption. Killed our industrial complex. Granted, there were republicans and democrats who were involved. So, you can't directly address what I said, either, without admitting that it's true. Got it! Why bother. You are just regurgitating crap that Harry has been drooling. It's not democrat vs republican that's the problem. It's liberal vs conservative that can't settle on a happy medium. Everyone wants to satisfy their own needs and wants. Nobody gives a **** about "Country". Forget the "got it". It makes you sound like the asshole JimH. You clearly have issues that go far beyond the scope of this usenet newsgroup. Everyone has issues. Yours would probably make you susceptible to felony charges. |
Dems owe me
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:09:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
Oh, I am expecting a scolding at any moment now. Would that include latex bustiers, fishnet stockings, 8 inch stilleto heels on thigh high boots, whips and/or chains? Just askin'... :) |
Dems owe me
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:27:21 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Good point. And I apologize for the stupid comment. Uncalled for. You are not excused. |
Dems owe me
Jim wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:10:06 GMT, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:16:57 -0500, wrote: Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. Getting in your excuses early? Stick with what's on your pedo mind. You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. Your thoughts mimic Krause's. Are you related? Unions, regulation, taxes, un-motivated, expensive, work forces, greed and corruption. Killed our industrial complex. Granted, there were republicans and democrats who were involved. What is sad that the first black president is going to be remember in history as the president who created the depression of 2008. With his advisers polosi, dodd, frank, and reid it is inevitable. All of Roosevelt's social welfare programs could not pull the country out of that depression. The Reagan/Bush tax cuts created more jobs than all of the social democrats welfare programs create since 1929. |
Dems owe me
|
Dems owe me
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:27:21 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Good point. And I apologize for the stupid comment. Uncalled for. You are not excused. uhhh....shouldn't that be up to the grieved party to decide? |
Dems owe me
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:27:21 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:34:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: So, my retirement fund loses $80,000 due to Dem Chris Dodd of the banking comitttee and Barney Frank and the other dems who refused to take action in 2005 when they were warned their actions were endangering the economy No - you lost $85,000 because you were stupid enough to keep your funds in whatever type of account you had it in. He hasn't "lost" anything unless he bailed. Better to sit it out. Good point. And I apologize for the stupid comment. Uncalled for. You are not excused. uhhh....shouldn't that be up to the grieved party to decide? Then why are you here? |
Dems owe me
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... snip... Unions, regulation, taxes, un-motivated, expensive, work forces, greed and corruption. Killed our industrial complex. Granted, there were republicans and democrats who were involved. Unions?? Only a small fraction of the US workforce is unionized, yet clowns like you still blame them for your situation. Wake up & blame the greedy *******s who run the companies. The greedy *******s who run the companies write me a check every two weeks. And, tomorrow is Q3 bonus payouts! |
Dems owe me
"BAR" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... snip... Unions, regulation, taxes, un-motivated, expensive, work forces, greed and corruption. Killed our industrial complex. Granted, there were republicans and democrats who were involved. Unions?? Only a small fraction of the US workforce is unionized, yet clowns like you still blame them for your situation. Wake up & blame the greedy *******s who run the companies. The greedy *******s who run the companies write me a check every two weeks. And, tomorrow is Q3 bonus payouts! And some of the worst performing industries are unionized. Including government employees. But it is not all the unions fault in the auto industry. The management caved all the time, when the US controlled 80% of the market. One of the reason that GM had thousands getting a salary, but did not have to come to work. One of the reason Toyota, etc can make a profit, is they have not been here long enough to build up a huge retirees retirement pay and medical. Plus they negotiated better contracts. The Toyota contract does not specify all the job classifications. They can send the lugnut installer to clean floors tomorrow. |
Dems owe me
|
Dems owe me
HK wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:53:39 -0500, Keith nuttle wrote: What is sad that the first black president is going to be remember in history as the president who created the depression of 2008. You are quite the moron, and this post from you proves it conclusively. Obama will not even take office until 2009. Keith probably showed up to vote on Wednesday so he could avoid the crowds. I am taking special delight in the angst of the "conservative" Republicans. CNN had a bit on Rush Limbaugh yesterday, and the video being shown made it look as if Rush was abou five blood pressure points away from a stroke. Now *that* would be a small step for mankind. The Republicans who are engaging in "PalinBashing" now are making revelations that are pretty frightening if true...that she didn't know "Africa" was a continent, that she refused to be briefed before her Couric interview, that she spent a lot more than $150,000...they're frightening because they reveal an amazing amount of shallowness on the part of the guy who picked her. What fun Tueday night was...an almost complete repudiation of "conservative" Republicanism. Quit dwelling in the past. Start thinking about how the armchair quarterback is going to perform once he gets in the game and goes to the line of scrimmage. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com