Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch You show such great restraint. ;-) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch You show such great restraint. ;-) Oh, I am expecting a scolding at any moment now. Eisboch |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch You show such great restraint. ;-) Oh, I am expecting a scolding at any moment now. Eisboch Remain unprovoked. :-) |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:09:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
Oh, I am expecting a scolding at any moment now. Would that include latex bustiers, fishnet stockings, 8 inch stilleto heels on thigh high boots, whips and/or chains? Just askin'... :) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dems top Olympics... | General | |||
Dems self destruct | General | |||
Dems Fail to Get It UP | General |