Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the documentation you
want.


But, agree or not, the Constitution requires one to be a naturally born
citizen.
If a question of eligibility arises due to conflicting family recollections
that are made public, how else does one satisfy the law?

The Duck provided a link that offers convincing proof. Why did Obama make
this all so difficult and controversial?
Also, as one of his potential employers (heh), I'd really like to review
his college transcripts. Any problem with that?

I know if I refused if asked, I wouldn't get the job.


Eisboch




Apparently, the framers of the Constitution provided no mechanism for
office seekers to prove their country of birth. I wonder why.

I had and have serious questions in 2000 about the intellectual
capabilities of George W. Bush. My doubts about him have proved to be valid.

I had a test I thought should be applied to any potential nominee for
President. I thought he or she should have to read aloud a full page
chosen at random from a novel by Melville or even by Dickens. If Bush
had had to do that, he would have lost to Gore and this country wouldn't
be sliding to hell in a handbasket right now.

On Nov 3, 8:41*am, Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the documentation you
want.

But, agree or not, the Constitution requires one to be a naturally born
citizen.
If a question of eligibility arises due to conflicting family recollections
that are made public, how else does one satisfy the law?

The Duck provided a link that offers convincing proof. *Why did Obama make
this all so difficult and controversial?
Also, as one of his potential employers (heh), *I'd really like to review
his college transcripts. *Any problem with that?

I know if I refused if asked, I wouldn't get the job.

Eisboch

Apparently, the framers of the Constitution provided no mechanism for
office seekers to prove their country of birth. I wonder why.

I had and have serious questions in 2000 about the intellectual
capabilities of George W. Bush. My doubts about him have proved to be valid.

I had a test I thought should be applied to any potential nominee for
President. I thought he or she should have to read aloud a full page
chosen at random from a novel by Melville or even by Dickens. If Bush
had had to do that, he would have lost to Gore and this country wouldn't
be sliding to hell in a handbasket right now.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, being able to read aloud without mistakes would certainly make
someone mentally fit and competent to run the country and make
decisions that would affect the whole world. No wonder you were a
liberal arts major at a second rate school. You're an idiot!

"Boater" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:

"Boater" wrote in message
...

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the documentation you
want.


But, agree or not, the Constitution requires one to be a naturally born
citizen.
If a question of eligibility arises due to conflicting family
recollections that are made public, how else does one satisfy the law?

The Duck provided a link that offers convincing proof. Why did Obama
make this all so difficult and controversial?
Also, as one of his potential employers (heh), I'd really like to review
his college transcripts. Any problem with that?

I know if I refused if asked, I wouldn't get the job.


Eisboch


Apparently, the framers of the Constitution provided no mechanism for
office seekers to prove their country of birth. I wonder why.



You have to wonder? To me, it is perfectly clear.

I had and have serious questions in 2000 about the intellectual
capabilities of George W. Bush. My doubts about him have proved to be
valid.

Some of us have serious questions in 2008 about the honesty and motives of
Barack Obama and his political machine.
Hopefully, our concerns will prove to be unwarranted.

Problem is, there is a lot more at stake here in 2008 than there was in
2000.

Eisboch
I had a test I thought should be applied to any potential nominee for
President. I thought he or she should have to read aloud a full page
chosen at random from a novel by Melville or even by Dickens. If Bush had
had to do that, he would have lost to Gore and this country wouldn't be
sliding to hell in a handbasket right now.

Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the documentation
you want.


But, agree or not, the Constitution requires one to be a naturally
born citizen.
If a question of eligibility arises due to conflicting family
recollections that are made public, how else does one satisfy the law?

The Duck provided a link that offers convincing proof. Why did Obama
make this all so difficult and controversial?
Also, as one of his potential employers (heh), I'd really like to
review his college transcripts. Any problem with that?

I know if I refused if asked, I wouldn't get the job.


Eisboch



Apparently, the framers of the Constitution provided no mechanism for
office seekers to prove their country of birth. I wonder why.

I had and have serious questions in 2000 about the intellectual
capabilities of George W. Bush. My doubts about him have proved to be
valid.

There is no Constitutional requirement that the President have an IQ
above his shoe size.

I had a test I thought should be applied to any potential nominee for
President. I thought he or she should have to read aloud a full page
chosen at random from a novel by Melville or even by Dickens. If Bush
had had to do that, he would have lost to Gore and this country wouldn't
be sliding to hell in a handbasket right now.

Three is a method to get the Constitution changed. Let us know how you
make out.