On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:44:39 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I don't. Nor do I have any specific "hopes". I am just disgusted with
all the dishonesty.
However, the claims in the lawsuit may have some legs. He's not the
only one who is digging into the issue.
If there's any merit to the claims, the media will have a field day once
their romance with Obama is over.
There's nothing better for ratings than a good old constitutional
crisis.

Eisboch

If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago. Not
to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history. He sued
Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks.
By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from Hawaii.

wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:44:39 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I don't. Nor do I have any specific "hopes". I am just disgusted with
all the dishonesty.
However, the claims in the lawsuit may have some legs. He's not the
only one who is digging into the issue.
If there's any merit to the claims, the media will have a field day once
their romance with Obama is over.
There's nothing better for ratings than a good old constitutional
crisis.

Eisboch

If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago. Not
to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history. He sued
Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks.
By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from Hawaii.

The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and medical
records?

On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from Hawaii.

The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is, an
American citizen born in Hawaii.

wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is, an
American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you do
with his running mate?

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is,
an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you do
with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

"Boater" wrote in message
...


Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?



Sad that anyone who has questions or reservations about *your* candidate is
automatically a dipschitt.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?



Sad that anyone who has questions or reservations about *your* candidate is
automatically a dipschitt.

Eisboch



I don't know of one reason why the Obama campaign should expend energy
to satisfy the curiosity of those who would not vote for him under any
circumstances. If some rightie has *proof* Obama was not born in Hawaii,
let him come forward with it. Proof, mind you, not speculation.

I don't recall referring to you as a dipschitt.

On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 07:13:54 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Boater" wrote in message
...


Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Sad that anyone who has questions or reservations about *your* candidate is
automatically a dipschitt.

You know, Obama talks and speaks like a theoretical mathematician.

To which you say - what?

Here's what I mean. Math geeks speak and think in a top down fashion.
You build a construct to fit a particular set of circumstances. There
is no foundation for this construct - just a hunch. or a guess. Once
the central idea is established, then there is a build to a proof.
However, you can't prove a construct without returning to the
foundation because if the foundation isn't firm, the proof won't pan
out.

Think of it this way - you build a ten story building without a
basement or basement walls and support beams to hold it up. You can't
put the penthouse on top of the building without first building the
foundation. So you walk back down and build the foundation, then
return to the 11th floor to see if the building still stands.

That doesn't mean that the central idea or theory isn't valid. It's
just a different way of looking at the problem and establishing the
conditions for success. The problem is that if the penthouse doesn't
topple the building you succeed. But if the penthouse tips the
building over, you have a huge problem.

That's the way Obama thinks - he perceives a problem exactly backwards
to the way social problems should be thought about.

That ain't good. :)

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you
do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy
of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout
of the information stored in an electronic database.

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu.
I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama
hasn't let this information be released. In the best case it would
put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the
charges that Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out.
What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to run for the
presidency? What do you do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy
of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout
of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his certificate
of live birth.