Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
On Oct 25, 8:38*am, Boater wrote:
jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, nor its content. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
Tim wrote:
On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
On Oct 25, 5:06*pm, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment *had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, *nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, Tell that to King George. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
Tim wrote:
On Oct 25, 5:06 pm, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, Tell that to King George. The Illinois State Rifle Association is affiliated with the NRA. It's a state NRA group, if you will. King George was a long time ago. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
Boater wrote:
Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 5:06 pm, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, Tell that to King George. The Illinois State Rifle Association is affiliated with the NRA. It's a state NRA group, if you will. King George was a long time ago. Harry. I cant find a direct link to the NRA from this organization. Cite a connection if you will. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
jim wrote:
Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 5:06 pm, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, Tell that to King George. The Illinois State Rifle Association is affiliated with the NRA. It's a state NRA group, if you will. King George was a long time ago. Harry. I cant find a direct link to the NRA from this organization. Cite a connection if you will. I found it on the group's web site. Look for it. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
Boater wrote:
jim wrote: Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 5:06 pm, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, Tell that to King George. The Illinois State Rifle Association is affiliated with the NRA. It's a state NRA group, if you will. King George was a long time ago. Harry. I cant find a direct link to the NRA from this organization. Cite a connection if you will. I found it on the group's web site. Look for it. Probably a wild goose chase. I'll pass. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:30:08 -0400, Boater
wrote: jim wrote: Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 5:06 pm, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, Tell that to King George. The Illinois State Rifle Association is affiliated with the NRA. It's a state NRA group, if you will. King George was a long time ago. Harry. I cant find a direct link to the NRA from this organization. Cite a connection if you will. I found it on the group's web site. Look for it. Lets see... State Rifle Association... National Rifle Association... Nope, I don't see any similarities there ! |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
On Oct 27, 6:30*pm, Boater wrote:
jim wrote: Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 5:06 pm, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment *had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, *nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to *holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, *Tell that to King George. The Illinois State Rifle Association is affiliated with the NRA. It's a state NRA group, if you will. King George was a long time ago. Harry. I cant find a direct link to the NRA from this organization. Cite a connection if you will. I found it on the group's web site. Look for it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Liar. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
H Krause please comment
On Oct 27, 3:41*pm, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 5:06 pm, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Oct 25, 8:38 am, Boater wrote: jim wrote: Illinois State Rifle Association I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing. Harry, I suppose you did what the OP requested. you made a comment. Even though your comment *had nothing to do with the aforesaid article, *nor its content. Well, I don't have any reason to pay attention to the over-the-top political ravings of the NRA. I've seen nothing rational that convinces me Obama has the slightest interest in my firearms, certainly not a poison "letter" from the head of the Illinois NRA. Harry, the posting had nothing to do with the NRA. It was from the Illinois State Rifle Association. And in so you have addressed your thoughts on the "NRA" BTW, concerning the US armed citizens not being able to *holding off an invading army and not being as tough as afghani's? hmmmm, *Tell that to King George. The Illinois State Rifle Association is affiliated with the NRA. It's a state NRA group, if you will. King George was a long time ago. Is "Affiliated"? Sure! But it's not the NRA. The posted letter wasnt' from the NRA. Why do you keep talking about the NRA when this isn't abotu the NRA? Doesn't matter I suppose. He'd not going to be getting my guns anyhow. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT - No Comment | ASA | |||
Another comment... | ASA | |||
No Comment... | General |