H Krause please comment
 

Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small
circle at 25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.

So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target
practice facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch


Do you know what offhand shooting is?

This is my pistol This is my gun This is for shooting This is for fun.

Wah Ha Ha Ha. Go play with your gun off-hand. WAFA


Yeah, I figured you were clueless. What else is new?

It's not me that's clueless. Ask a veteran what that little rhyme is all
about. WAFA

H Krause please comment
 

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...


When I was "of age" for the military, there was nothing happening that
required the homeland to be defended. There was that mess in Vietnam, but
that was a war we perpetuated by taking over from the French, who got
their butts kicked there and left.


Had nothing to do with the USSR, huh?

Harry doesn't think on a global scale, everything is in sound bites.

H Krause please comment
 

Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...


When I was "of age" for the military, there was nothing happening
that required the homeland to be defended. There was that mess in
Vietnam, but that was a war we perpetuated by taking over from the
French, who got their butts kicked there and left.


Had nothing to do with the USSR, huh?

Eisboch




The Soviet Union was a minor player in the Vietnam War. It supplied a
significant amount of armament and materiel to the North Vietnamese, but
it had a small number of troops in that country. The PRC was a major
player, of course.

Yeah, all of those SA-2's and MIG-15's, MIG-17's and MIG-21's came from
the PRC?

Our insistence on propping up right-wing dictators didn't serve us well
in Cuba, Vietnam, Iran, Panama, Nicaragua or Iraq. The only major
fighting war we've had in a long, long time that made sense was George
H.W. Bush's Gulf War, and only because he had most of the world behind
us. And even that war had unintended bad consequences for us.

Communism has failed every where it has been forced on to the population
at the point of a gun too. I don't see you railing against it.

H Krause please comment
 

Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small
circle at 25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.

So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target
practice facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch


Do you know what offhand shooting is?

Everyone who has been trained to shoot in the military knows what
offhand shooting is and has had to shoot offhand as part of qualifying
with the rifle or pistol.

You are not impressing any of us.

H Krause please comment
 

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...


When I was "of age" for the military, there was nothing happening that
required the homeland to be defended. There was that mess in Vietnam,
but that was a war we perpetuated by taking over from the French, who
got their butts kicked there and left.


Had nothing to do with the USSR, huh?

Eisboch




The Soviet Union was a minor player in the Vietnam War. It supplied a
significant amount of armament and materiel to the North Vietnamese, but
it had a small number of troops in that country. The PRC was a major
player, of course.

None the less, USSR backed. Those were not WW II jap zeros. They were
Russian MiGs with Russian bombs often with Russian or Chinese ground
support.

Our insistence on propping up right-wing dictators didn't serve us well in
Cuba, Vietnam, Iran, Panama, Nicaragua or Iraq. The only major fighting
war we've had in a long, long time that made sense was George H.W. Bush's
Gulf War, and only because he had most of the world behind us. And even
that war had unintended bad consequences for us.

Agreed here. Barry Goldwater was more sane than anyone thought.

Prolonged engagements in these places is stupid, expensive and ineffective.
Do more missions like Libya where you go in, hit strategic targets with
prejudice and intent to get the leaders and then leave. Fight a terrorist
like a terrorist, hit and run. Forget reclaiming their nations, they have
been at war so long they don't know who the enemy is any more. They just
know killing is power and fear.

Or in at least tell the Saudi's that if they want protection from their
fellow Muslims, here, do it yourself and give them nukes. I am sure they
would sooner or later annihilate each other with a little subtle help.

H Krause please comment
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small circle
at 25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.

So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target
practice facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch

Do you know what offhand shooting is?

Nope. Not a clue.

All I know is that they gave me a Glock 9 mm that holds what, 14 or 15
rounds or something like that?
We programmed the target holder for the standard 25 yards, and I fired
away.

I don't aim. The first three or four rounds are wasted walking "up" to
the target, but after that, I was consistently within three rings.

I don't know how I can do it, but I do. We went back several times over
the course of a week and the results were always the same. Even the
Grunts were impressed.

Eisboch


Impossible, can't be done. Especially by someone with a military background
in the Navy. 8)

H Krause please comment
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"jim" wrote in message
...



Harry reads from a DNC supplied script. Any time he tries to ad-lib he
makes a fool of himself


Yep.

Most of Harry's political posts are nothing more than the latest DNC
official "positions" that we hear otherwise via the media constantly, day
by day, hour by hour. I suspect he's on the mailing list.


He just adds the foul language for emphasis.



It would really be refreshing to hear some personal, real time opinions,
supported by facts.

Eisboch

H Krause please comment
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:25:06 -0400, Eisboch wrote:

"Boater" wrote in message
...



When I was "of age" for the military, there was nothing happening that
required the homeland to be defended. There was that mess in Vietnam,
but that was a war we perpetuated by taking over from the French, who
got their butts kicked there and left.


Had nothing to do with the USSR, huh?

Very little, it had more to do with us, and our preferences for
imperialists, as opposed to nationalists. More importantly, our anti-
communism was allowed to trump our pro-democracy policies. You do
realize, it was Diem that blocked the elections mandated by the Geneva
Accords? Even Eisenhower had said, that if those elections were held, Ho
Chi Minh would have won 80% of the vote.

H Krause please comment
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:35:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I don't know how I can do it, but I do. We went back several times over the
course of a week and the results were always the same. Even the Grunts
were impressed.

Hand eye coordination is paramount in handling semi-auto hand guns -
you've got a good eye and your wrist and hand do what you tell them to
do.

Twitch reflex also has something to do with it - the higher the twitch
reflex, the more accurate your grouping will be.

For me, semi-auto handguns are a PIA - I have two, but I much prefer a
revolver - limited rounds, but I'm much more accurate with a revolver
than a semi-auto.

Back when I carried a Navy 1911 .45 - you didn't want to be near the
practice range when I was around. :)

H Krause please comment
 

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:04:35 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Eisboch" wrote in message
m...

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small circle
at 25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.

So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target
practice facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch

Do you know what offhand shooting is?

Nope. Not a clue.

All I know is that they gave me a Glock 9 mm that holds what, 14 or 15
rounds or something like that?
We programmed the target holder for the standard 25 yards, and I fired
away.

I don't aim. The first three or four rounds are wasted walking "up" to
the target, but after that, I was consistently within three rings.

I don't know how I can do it, but I do. We went back several times over
the course of a week and the results were always the same. Even the
Grunts were impressed.

Impossible, can't be done. Especially by someone with a military background
in the Navy. 8)

Hey - technically, I was in the Navy.

Technically. :)

H Krause please comment
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:04:35 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Eisboch" wrote in message
om...

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small
circle
at 25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.

So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target
practice facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch

Do you know what offhand shooting is?

Nope. Not a clue.

All I know is that they gave me a Glock 9 mm that holds what, 14 or 15
rounds or something like that?
We programmed the target holder for the standard 25 yards, and I fired
away.

I don't aim. The first three or four rounds are wasted walking "up" to
the target, but after that, I was consistently within three rings.

I don't know how I can do it, but I do. We went back several times over
the course of a week and the results were always the same. Even the
Grunts were impressed.

Impossible, can't be done. Especially by someone with a military
background
in the Navy. 8)

Hey - technically, I was in the Navy.

Technically. :)

You know where you can stick that technicality. We were taught better than
that. 8)

H Krause please comment
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:35:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I don't know how I can do it, but I do. We went back several times over
the
course of a week and the results were always the same. Even the Grunts
were impressed.

Hand eye coordination is paramount in handling semi-auto hand guns -
you've got a good eye and your wrist and hand do what you tell them to
do.

Twitch reflex also has something to do with it - the higher the twitch
reflex, the more accurate your grouping will be.

For me, semi-auto handguns are a PIA - I have two, but I much prefer a
revolver - limited rounds, but I'm much more accurate with a revolver
than a semi-auto.

Back when I carried a Navy 1911 .45 - you didn't want to be near the
practice range when I was around. :)

Hell, even a city boy like me qualified expert with both the .45 and M1. I
remember my boot camp M1 score of 243 out of the possible 250. Won 25 bucks
from Leatherneck magazine for the highest boot camp score during that
particular year.

Of course you young wipper snappers wouldn't know anything about the M1.
8)

H Krause please comment
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...


Hell, even a city boy like me qualified expert with both the .45 and M1.
I remember my boot camp M1 score of 243 out of the possible 250. Won 25
bucks from Leatherneck magazine for the highest boot camp score during
that particular year.

Of course you young wipper snappers wouldn't know anything about the M1.
8)


All I remember of an M1 was doing some kind of exercise routine with it in
boot camp. I forget what is was called, but you did it in time to some
march music they played. Pushed it over your head three times, then
straight forward three times , then to the left, etc.

After an hour of this, the stupid thing felt like a lead bar.

Eisboch

H Krause please comment
 

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:50:52 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:35:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I don't know how I can do it, but I do. We went back several times over
the
course of a week and the results were always the same. Even the Grunts
were impressed.

Hand eye coordination is paramount in handling semi-auto hand guns -
you've got a good eye and your wrist and hand do what you tell them to
do.

Twitch reflex also has something to do with it - the higher the twitch
reflex, the more accurate your grouping will be.

For me, semi-auto handguns are a PIA - I have two, but I much prefer a
revolver - limited rounds, but I'm much more accurate with a revolver
than a semi-auto.

Back when I carried a Navy 1911 .45 - you didn't want to be near the
practice range when I was around. :)

Hell, even a city boy like me qualified expert with both the .45 and M1. I
remember my boot camp M1 score of 243 out of the possible 250. Won 25 bucks
from Leatherneck magazine for the highest boot camp score during that
particular year.

Of course you young wipper snappers wouldn't know anything about the M1.
8)

Want to bet? :)

H Krause please comment
 

D.Duck wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:35:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I don't know how I can do it, but I do. We went back several times over
the
course of a week and the results were always the same. Even the Grunts
were impressed.
Hand eye coordination is paramount in handling semi-auto hand guns -
you've got a good eye and your wrist and hand do what you tell them to
do.

Twitch reflex also has something to do with it - the higher the twitch
reflex, the more accurate your grouping will be.

For me, semi-auto handguns are a PIA - I have two, but I much prefer a
revolver - limited rounds, but I'm much more accurate with a revolver
than a semi-auto.

Back when I carried a Navy 1911 .45 - you didn't want to be near the
practice range when I was around. :)

Hell, even a city boy like me qualified expert with both the .45 and M1. I
remember my boot camp M1 score of 243 out of the possible 250. Won 25 bucks
from Leatherneck magazine for the highest boot camp score during that
particular year.

Of course you young wipper snappers wouldn't know anything about the M1.
8)




French-Indian War vet, eh?

H Krause please comment
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:31:03 -0400, BAR wrote:

Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...


When I was "of age" for the military, there was nothing happening
that required the homeland to be defended. There was that mess in
Vietnam, but that was a war we perpetuated by taking over from the
French, who got their butts kicked there and left.


Had nothing to do with the USSR, huh?

Eisboch




The Soviet Union was a minor player in the Vietnam War. It supplied a
significant amount of armament and materiel to the North Vietnamese, but
it had a small number of troops in that country. The PRC was a major
player, of course.

Yeah, all of those SA-2's and MIG-15's, MIG-17's and MIG-21's came from
the PRC?

Our insistence on propping up right-wing dictators didn't serve us well
in Cuba, Vietnam, Iran, Panama, Nicaragua or Iraq. The only major
fighting war we've had in a long, long time that made sense was George
H.W. Bush's Gulf War, and only because he had most of the world behind
us. And even that war had unintended bad consequences for us.

Communism has failed every where it has been forced on to the population
at the point of a gun too. I don't see you railing against it.

Looks like the man just left. A few facts scares the crap out of him.
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

H Krause please comment
 

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:39:33 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:25:06 -0400, Eisboch wrote:

"Boater" wrote in message
...



When I was "of age" for the military, there was nothing happening that
required the homeland to be defended. There was that mess in Vietnam,
but that was a war we perpetuated by taking over from the French, who
got their butts kicked there and left.


Had nothing to do with the USSR, huh?

Very little, it had more to do with us, and our preferences for
imperialists, as opposed to nationalists. More importantly, our anti-
communism was allowed to trump our pro-democracy policies. You do
realize, it was Diem that blocked the elections mandated by the Geneva
Accords? Even Eisenhower had said, that if those elections were held, Ho
Chi Minh would have won 80% of the vote.

Yeah, all of those SA-2's and MIG-15's, MIG-17's and MIG-21's came from
the PRC?

[Borrowed from BAR]
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

H Krause please comment
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:43:17 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Boater" wrote in message
...


I doubt that many of those who haven't fired a firearm in years can just
pick one up, load it and shoot straight, unless the firearm is a shotgun.
I further doubt that many of those who fired a firearm years ago even own
a *serviceable* firearm.


And I could prove you wrong.

And I am just a hack.

Eisboch


Bicycle riding, after a 40 year break, wasn't too hard to pick back up. I
doubt if aiming a 30-30 would be much more difficult.

Of course, it probably makes one feel 'manly' to imply he's the only one
who can shoot. He forgets that most of us actually have some military
experience.
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

H Krause please comment
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:01:20 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Boater" wrote in message
...


Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small circle at
25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.

So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target practice
facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch


While he's loading and aiming his 9mm SIG, some smart guy will shoot him
from 350 yards with a rifle.

WAFD!
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

H Krause please comment
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:18:24 -0400, Boater wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small circle at
25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.

So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target practice
facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch



Do you know what offhand shooting is?

It's stupidity if someone is shooting at you. Prone, behind lots of
sandbags, is a much better position.
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

H Krause please comment
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:18:24 -0400, Boater wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Further, I don't shoot at 200 or 300 yards. I shoot pistols and can
offhand a full magazine from my 9 mm SIG into a very very small circle at
25 yards, the "standard" pistol distance.
So can I, and I did it several times in a row at the Marines target practice
facility in Norfolk a couple of years ago.
First time ever for me.

What's the big deal?

Eisboch


Do you know what offhand shooting is?

It's stupidity if someone is shooting at you. Prone, behind lots of
sandbags, is a much better position.


Some of us are smart enough to not find ourselves prone, behind a lot of
sandbags, with someone shooting at us.

Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.

A John Herring truism:

I've been a Catholic for 60+ years but I can't spell crèche.

H Krause please comment
 

Boater wrote:

(he asks)
Do you know what offhand shooting is?

(Then he explains)
Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.



I'm glad you cleared that up. I was thinking of Harry huddled in a
corner with his girlie magazines doing some off hand shooting. ;-)

H Krause please comment
 

H Krause please comment
 

H Krause please comment
 

H Krause please comment
 

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:09:51 -0400, jim wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:08:18 -0400, jim wrote:

Boater wrote:

(he asks)
Do you know what offhand shooting is?
(Then he explains)
Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.


I'm glad you cleared that up. I was thinking of Harry huddled in a
corner with his girlie magazines doing some off hand shooting. ;-)


Pretty creepy fantasy ya got there. You are one sick pup.


What creeped you out? Girlie magazines or off hand shooting.

The fact that you posted here about your fantasies involving thinking
about Harry doing some "off hand shooting" while looking at girly
mags.


He was in the navy afterall... what else was there to do on long
deployments.

H Krause please comment
 

H Krause please comment
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:09:51 -0400, jim wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:08:18 -0400, jim wrote:

Boater wrote:

(he asks)
Do you know what offhand shooting is?
(Then he explains)
Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.

I'm glad you cleared that up. I was thinking of Harry huddled in a
corner with his girlie magazines doing some off hand shooting. ;-)

Pretty creepy fantasy ya got there. You are one sick pup.

What creeped you out? Girlie magazines or off hand shooting.
The fact that you posted here about your fantasies involving thinking
about Harry doing some "off hand shooting" while looking at girly
mags.


He was in the navy afterall... what else was there to do on long
deployments.


I didn't know Harry when I was in the service. I imagine he was off
boffing some 14 year old at the time.

H Krause please comment
 

Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:09:51 -0400, jim wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:08:18 -0400, jim wrote:

Boater wrote:

(he asks)
Do you know what offhand shooting is?
(Then he explains)
Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.

I'm glad you cleared that up. I was thinking of Harry huddled in a
corner with his girlie magazines doing some off hand shooting. ;-)

Pretty creepy fantasy ya got there. You are one sick pup.

What creeped you out? Girlie magazines or off hand shooting.

The fact that you posted here about your fantasies involving thinking
about Harry doing some "off hand shooting" while looking at girly
mags.


I suspect FloridaJim's shooter doesn't work, so all he can do is
fantasize about mine, which does work .
Have you told your wife the good news?

H Krause please comment
 

jim wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:09:51 -0400, jim wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:08:18 -0400, jim wrote:

Boater wrote:

(he asks)
Do you know what offhand shooting is?
(Then he explains)
Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.

I'm glad you cleared that up. I was thinking of Harry huddled in a
corner with his girlie magazines doing some off hand shooting. ;-)

Pretty creepy fantasy ya got there. You are one sick pup.

What creeped you out? Girlie magazines or off hand shooting.
The fact that you posted here about your fantasies involving thinking
about Harry doing some "off hand shooting" while looking at girly
mags.


He was in the navy afterall... what else was there to do on long
deployments.

I didn't know Harry when I was in the service. I imagine he was off
boffing some 14 year old at the time.


As a matter of fact, schitt-for-brains, when you were sitting on your
ass on some navy ship, I was out looking for bodies in Vietnam. Shove
that up your tailpipe.

Got it?

H Krause please comment
 

Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:09:51 -0400, jim wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:08:18 -0400, jim wrote:

Boater wrote:

(he asks)
Do you know what offhand shooting is?
(Then he explains)
Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.

I'm glad you cleared that up. I was thinking of Harry huddled in a
corner with his girlie magazines doing some off hand shooting. ;-)

Pretty creepy fantasy ya got there. You are one sick pup.

What creeped you out? Girlie magazines or off hand shooting.
The fact that you posted here about your fantasies involving thinking
about Harry doing some "off hand shooting" while looking at girly
mags.


He was in the navy afterall... what else was there to do on long
deployments.

I didn't know Harry when I was in the service. I imagine he was off
boffing some 14 year old at the time.


As a matter of fact, schitt-for-brains, when you were sitting on your
ass on some navy ship, I was out looking for bodies in Vietnam. Shove
that up your tailpipe.

Got it?

Didn't know they hired candy ass civilians to perform that sad task. I
kinda don't believe you.

H Krause please comment
 

On Oct 25, 8:43*am, Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Illinois State Rifle Association

I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for
youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of measures
to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I have no use for
the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing.

No comment on the substance of the letter, eh? Damned if you do. Damned
if you don't

My comment on the NRA's politics is right there for you to see. Are you
not able to understand a sentence that says:

"Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political
posturing."

H Krause please comment
 

On Oct 25, 5:18*pm, jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
news:6s2dna7fqKsrp57UnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews. com...
Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
jim wrote:
Illinois State Rifle Association
I think the NRA offers worthwhile firearms safety programs for
youngsters and on occasion has been a meaningful proponent of
measures to preserve some of nature's amenities. Beyond that, I
have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top political posturing.
No comment on the substance of the letter, eh? Damned if you do.
Damned if you don't
My comment on the NRA's politics is right there for you to see. Are
you not able to understand a sentence that says:

"Beyond that, I have no use for the NRA or its over-the-top
political posturing."
The NRA protects your right to shoot up stumpy. Shooting up stumpy
does nothing to feed your family or protect your home.

Not directly.

But if someone comes into you home with intent on raping your wife or
daughter you will feel comfortable in using it not on the stump, but
the intruder.

I don't actually own a firearm, difficult to do legally in Canada.
Criminals have them, police have them. *But honest people don't. *
While death of criminals by firearms is down, they refuse to
acknowledge death by knives, bats, even 4x4s is higher.

Your best national defence is it's honest citizens being trained and
possession firearms. *If 20,000 Chinese invaded Canada from BC they
would find very little resistance in taking Canada.

2,000,000 Chinese were to land in Portland Oregon and would not
likely make it past the Rockies if they got that far.

A major step in controlling people is to disarm them.

If Krause was allowed to speak freely he would have to agree with you.

The concept of individual citizens armed with small arms holding off a
huge invading army is an NRA wet dream. Americans aren't as tough as
Afghanis.

We understand. You are between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand
you love your guns but on the other hand you must pretend that it
doesn't bother you that Nobama intends to take your guns away. I
wouldn't want to be in your ballet slippers right now.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

His guns are probably just more of his lies. The poor pathetic thing
has to lie about every aspect of his life.
Lobster boat
Hatteras
Guns
on and on.

H Krause please comment
 

(Tom*Francis*-*SWSports)wrote
Hand eye coordination is paramount in handling semi-auto hand guns -
you've got a good eye and your wrist and hand do what you tell them to
do.
Twitch reflex also has something to do with it - the higher the twitch
reflex, the more accurate your grouping will be.
For me, semi-auto handguns are a PIA - I have two, but I much prefer a
revolver - limited rounds, but I'm much more accurate with a revolver
than a semi-auto.
Back when I carried a Navy 1911 .45 - you didn't want to be near the
practice range when I was around. :)

I know what you mean, I get a bit twitchy now and then myself. :) UD

http://www.youtube.com/user/captuglydan

H Krause please comment
 

UglyDan®©™ wrote:
(Tom Francis - SWSports)wrote
Hand eye coordination is paramount in handling semi-auto hand guns -
you've got a good eye and your wrist and hand do what you tell them to
do.
Twitch reflex also has something to do with it - the higher the twitch
reflex, the more accurate your grouping will be.
For me, semi-auto handguns are a PIA - I have two, but I much prefer a
revolver - limited rounds, but I'm much more accurate with a revolver
than a semi-auto.
Back when I carried a Navy 1911 .45 - you didn't want to be near the
practice range when I was around. :)

I know what you mean, I get a bit twitchy now and then myself. :) UD

http://www.youtube.com/user/captuglydan





Not bad at all. Are you wearing ear protection? Hard to tell from the
videos.

I kinda like this one:

http://s21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...=knockdown.flv

H Krause please comment
 

Boater wrote:
UglyDan®©™ wrote:
(Tom Francis - SWSports)wrote Hand eye coordination is paramount
in handling semi-auto hand guns -
you've got a good eye and your wrist and hand do what you tell them to
do. Twitch reflex also has something to do with it - the higher the
twitch
reflex, the more accurate your grouping will be. For me, semi-auto
handguns are a PIA - I have two, but I much prefer a
revolver - limited rounds, but I'm much more accurate with a revolver
than a semi-auto. Back when I carried a Navy 1911 .45 - you didn't
want to be near the
practice range when I was around. :)

I know what you mean, I get a bit twitchy now and then myself. :) UD

http://www.youtube.com/user/captuglydan





Not bad at all. Are you wearing ear protection? Hard to tell from the
videos.

I kinda like this one:

http://s21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...=knockdown.flv

And this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og9ccsb1v6o&NR=1

H Krause please comment
 

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:20:11 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:09:51 -0400, jim wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:08:18 -0400, jim wrote:

Boater wrote:

(he asks)
Do you know what offhand shooting is?
(Then he explains)
Offhand shooting, dipschitt, is a competitive or range stance, not
something used in a gunfight.


I'm glad you cleared that up. I was thinking of Harry huddled in a
corner with his girlie magazines doing some off hand shooting. ;-)


Pretty creepy fantasy ya got there. You are one sick pup.


What creeped you out? Girlie magazines or off hand shooting.

The fact that you posted here about your fantasies involving thinking
about Harry doing some "off hand shooting" while looking at girly
mags.


He was in the navy afterall... what else was there to do on long
deployments.


Salty's your kinda guy, huh Don?
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

H Krause please comment
 

WAFL!


--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

H Krause please comment
 

(Boater) wrote
Not bad at all. Are you wearing ear protection? Hard to tell from the
videos.
I kinda like this one:
http://s21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...=knockdown.flv

Thanks, I always wear protection. Check out Sport Ears.
Thats excellent shooting, but the guys using a Eotech Red Dot with a
compensater. I shoot stock, and revolver class. UD

H Krause please comment
 

(jim)wrote
And this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og9ccsb1v6o&NR=1

Thats Jerry Miculek, I've shot in a few matches with him, amazing guy,
His wife Kay is one hell of a shot too. UD