Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 20:59:52 -0700, "jps" wrote:
"del cecchi" wrote in message ... I've heard our increased productivity is indeed due to longer hours and reduced time off. I'd like to see your sources and what measures they're really using. two minutes on google turned up the Federal Reserve Bank of NY discussing productivity in terms of output per hour. So whoever you heard the contrary from had a lying political agenda. I understand your perspective, but, if workers are putting in extra hours without additional pay, and output on an hourly basis didn't change because of the extra hours, that'd also show up as "productivity" increases. Right or wrong? jps And I used to think lead was dense. Jipsy, in your example, will the output per hour change? No? Then the productivity did not increase. The production increased. John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Great weekend | General |