On Sep 29, 1:47*pm, A Real Boater wrote:
As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...

--http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6

The Dems control the House and could have passed it on their own if
they truly thought it was the best thing for the Country. 90 some
Dems voted against it.

wrote:
On Sep 29, 3:08 pm, A Real Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Sep 29, 2:25 pm, A Real Boater wrote:
wrote:
The majority party did not get enough votes to pass it.. The rest of
my post is fact, look up who took money from Freddie and Fannie, see
Obama is number 2.. Instead of piping the party line. Fact is, no one
trusts Pelosi and the most corrupt congress in history...
Idiot. Until last month, McCain's campaign manager's company was sucking
on the Freddie/Fannie teat, and taking down more a month than you earn
in a year.
And Obama took more than all but one congressman, but you are not
capable of honest debate so you will have to continue this with your
sockpuppets
Drool on, d.f.

--

Check the facts, liar... Hey, at least you have Salty behind you, but
he has less credibility here than you do so.. you got nuttin'.




I'm not interested in who is behind me, d.f. I am interested in reality.
You are as far removed from it as anyone who has ever posted here, with
the possible exception of Tuuk.

I'll make you a bet. There's an even chance that Obama will be elected
President, and, with a Democratic congress, will get some sort of health
care legislation passed into law that will provide *YOU* with benefits
you do not have at the moment and cannot get.

Here's the bet: if what I believe will come to pass happens, and Obama
is elected, and health care benefits are extended, *you* will be one of
the first in line to get them.

Just a gentleman's bet here.

Oh...and I know this is too sophisticated for you, but here it is - -the
Bill was a product of the Republican Bush Administration, and something
the Bush Administration asked Congress to pass. Your president doesn't
have enough clout with his own party to get a bill passed that the
country's credit markets need.

JimH wrote:
On Sep 29, 1:47 pm, A Real Boater wrote:
As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...

--http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6

The Dems control the House and could have passed it on their own if
they truly thought it was the best thing for the Country. 90 some
Dems voted against it.



There was an agreement from both parties that each would put up about
half the votes needed for the bill to pass. The Republicans welshed. Two
thirds of the Democratic majority voted for the bill.

The Bush Administration didn't have the political clout to sell its own
bill to its own party.

On Sep 29, 3:19*pm, wrote:
On Sep 29, 1:55*pm, wrote:





On Sep 29, 1:47*pm, A Real Boater wrote:

As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...

--http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6

Well, that's what Pelosi gets for making it political right from day
one to the last speech before the vote. This falls right in the lap of
Dodd, Frank, and Obama who took more money from Freddie and Fannie
than any other Congressman, save one and closely followed by Kerry.
Even though the MSM has decided not to note the facts like they did
with Enron, which was nothing compared to this, but this was dems so
silence. If the dem leadership who caused this mess had just taken
responsibility for not listening to Bush and McCain in the first
place, we might be in a better positition.

There is no way we should bail out banks that worked with Obama and
Acorn to give loans to illegals and others who did not deserve, and
had no intention of paying them...

Twit, the republican platform of de-regulation is what left the door
open. *Used to be most borrowers needed 10% in cold hard cash to buy a
house. *Not very many peope walked away for that investment.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Didn't really expect name calling from you, but so be it.. Like I said
before, you have had a hard on for me for a while, guess it's what I
should expect..

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:14:28 -0400, A Real Boater
wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:47:05 -0400, A Real Boater
wrote:

As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...

Good for them. Somebody's got some guts.
BTW, 40% of the Dems voted against it too.
You a Wall Street guy?

--Vic




There was an agreement among the Democratic and Republican House
leadership that each party would provide approximately one-half the
votes necessary to pass the Bill. The Dems lived up to the agreement.
Sixty seven percent of the Republicans welshed. The Republicans did not
live up to the agreement of their party leadership.

Parties often don't follow their leadership when important principles
are at stake. The Rep leaders couldn't deliver their promise, and the
Dems only garnered 60% of their members.

My concern is not with Wall Street, but with the flow of credit to Main
Street. The credit system, the one that supports all businesses in this
country, is close to a shut down.

Because Paulson and the other Wall Street jokers says so?
Don't worry. Everything is going to be all right.
But fill up your larders just in case.

--Vic

Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:14:28 -0400, A Real Boater
wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:47:05 -0400, A Real Boater
wrote:

As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...
Good for them. Somebody's got some guts.
BTW, 40% of the Dems voted against it too.
You a Wall Street guy?

--Vic



There was an agreement among the Democratic and Republican House
leadership that each party would provide approximately one-half the
votes necessary to pass the Bill. The Dems lived up to the agreement.
Sixty seven percent of the Republicans welshed. The Republicans did not
live up to the agreement of their party leadership.

Parties often don't follow their leadership when important principles
are at stake. The Rep leaders couldn't deliver their promise, and the
Dems only garnered 60% of their members.

My concern is not with Wall Street, but with the flow of credit to Main
Street. The credit system, the one that supports all businesses in this
country, is close to a shut down.

Because Paulson and the other Wall Street jokers says so?
Don't worry. Everything is going to be all right.
But fill up your larders just in case.

--Vic


Interestingly, on the gun boards, the word is to "fill your pantry and
buy more ammo."

On Sep 29, 3:27*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:14:28 -0400, A Real Boater
wrote:





Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:47:05 -0400, A Real Boater
wrote:

As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...

Good for them. *Somebody's got some guts.
BTW, 40% of the Dems voted against it too.
You a Wall Street guy?

--Vic

There was an agreement among the Democratic and Republican House
leadership that each party would provide approximately one-half the
votes necessary to pass the Bill. The Dems lived up to the agreement.
Sixty seven percent of the Republicans welshed. The Republicans did not
live up to the agreement of their party leadership.

Parties often don't follow their leadership when important principles
are at stake. *The Rep leaders couldn't deliver their promise, and the
Dems only garnered 60% of their members.

My concern is not with Wall Street, but with the flow of credit to Main
Street. The credit system, the one that supports all businesses in this
country, is close to a shut down.

Because Paulson and the other Wall Street jokers says so?
Don't worry. *Everything is going to be all right.
But fill up your larders just in case.

--Vic- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Looks like we need to leave them to their one sided blather.. Opinions
are not allowed here, only ideology. But I can't get back after James
Gang or folks like Wayne will be all over me.... so I guess I just sit
back and take the name calling.. Oh well..

wrote:
On Sep 29, 3:19 pm, wrote:
On Sep 29, 1:55 pm, wrote:





On Sep 29, 1:47 pm, A Real Boater wrote:
As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...
--http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6
Well, that's what Pelosi gets for making it political right from day
one to the last speech before the vote. This falls right in the lap of
Dodd, Frank, and Obama who took more money from Freddie and Fannie
than any other Congressman, save one and closely followed by Kerry.
Even though the MSM has decided not to note the facts like they did
with Enron, which was nothing compared to this, but this was dems so
silence. If the dem leadership who caused this mess had just taken
responsibility for not listening to Bush and McCain in the first
place, we might be in a better positition.
There is no way we should bail out banks that worked with Obama and
Acorn to give loans to illegals and others who did not deserve, and
had no intention of paying them...
Twit, the republican platform of de-regulation is what left the door
open. Used to be most borrowers needed 10% in cold hard cash to buy a
house. Not very many peope walked away for that investment.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Didn't really expect name calling from you, but so be it.. Like I said
before, you have had a hard on for me for a while, guess it's what I
should expect..



Interesting how you try to make personal every post that disagrees with
your various uninformed positions.

The reality is, of course, that no one has a real hard-on for you, with
the possible exceptions of Loogy, Herring and Florida Jim. It's obvious
you boys want to do each other.

On Sep 29, 3:26*pm, A Real Boater wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Sep 29, 1:47 pm, A Real Boater wrote:
As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...

--http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6

The Dems control the House and could have passed it on their own if
they truly thought it was the best thing for the Country. *90 some
Dems voted against it.

There was an agreement from both parties that each would put up about
half the votes needed for the bill to pass. The Republicans welshed. Two
thirds of the Democratic majority voted for the bill.

The Bush Administration didn't have the political clout to sell its own
bill to its own party.

You are echoing the reason this Country is in real
trouble.........partisanship. The market was holding at around -570
until Pelosi and her whining gang started to turn it into a food
fight. From that point on the sell off went crazy.

There is enough blame to go around on both sides. The Congress needs
to do what we voted them into office for and get this fixed.

JimH wrote:
On Sep 29, 3:26 pm, A Real Boater wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Sep 29, 1:47 pm, A Real Boater wrote:
As the GOP House members vote down the bailout bill...
--http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6
The Dems control the House and could have passed it on their own if
they truly thought it was the best thing for the Country. 90 some
Dems voted against it.
There was an agreement from both parties that each would put up about
half the votes needed for the bill to pass. The Republicans welshed. Two
thirds of the Democratic majority voted for the bill.

The Bush Administration didn't have the political clout to sell its own
bill to its own party.

You are echoing the reason this Country is in real
trouble.........partisanship. The market was holding at around -570
until Pelosi and her whining gang started to turn it into a food
fight. From that point on the sell off went crazy.

There is enough blame to go around on both sides. The Congress needs
to do what we voted them into office for and get this fixed.


Looks like the House will try again on Wednesday, after Rosh Hashanah.


--
http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6