My comment about your reinstatement of Harry was gratuitous. I therefore
apologize for same.
--
John H.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:48:59 -0400, John H. wrote:

My comment about your reinstatement of Harry was gratuitous. I therefore
apologize for same.

PS. Although it doesn't look it, I actually made this post before reading
your 'retirement announcement'.
--
John H.

On Sep 21, 7:48*am, John H. wrote:
My comment about your reinstatement of Harry was gratuitous. I therefore
apologize for same.
--
John H.

You sure are doing a lot of apologizing lately John.

On Sep 21, 9:29*am, JimH wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:48*am, John H. wrote:

My comment about your reinstatement of Harry was gratuitous. I therefore
apologize for same.
--
John H.

You sure are doing a lot of apologizing lately John.

Yeah, unlike you, he's man enough to apologize.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:48:59 -0400, John H. wrote:

PS. Although it doesn't look it, I actually made this post before reading
your 'retirement announcement'.
--
John H.


Proud of yourself?
Pretty soon Chuck will tire of your behaviour and then we'll be back where
we started.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:29:39 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Sep 21, 7:48*am, John H. wrote:
My comment about your reinstatement of Harry was gratuitous. I therefore
apologize for same.
--
John H.

You sure are doing a lot of apologizing lately John.

That's because he's a sorry wretch.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:21:51 -0400, DK
wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:29:39 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Sep 21, 7:48 am, John H. wrote:
My comment about your reinstatement of Harry was gratuitous. I therefore
apologize for same.
--
John H.
You sure are doing a lot of apologizing lately John.

That's because he's a sorry wretch.



What's your excuse?

asshole

I don't make excuses for JohnH. Love your new sig. It's so YOU.