Crossposting
 

Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch

Crossposting
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.

Crossposting
 

Eisboch wrote:
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch




I counted 31 posts here since midnight.

Of these:

Six had something to do with boats.

Of those:

Four were from Tim, who mostly stays on topic here, but three of those
had nothing to do with recreational boating.

There were two whining posts from regulars here, including one from you,
and the usual drool from Wally.

As previously stated, if you want this to be a newsgroup about
recreational boating, you have it withing your power to make it so. Of
course, you'll have to convince the remaining few regulars here who
actually "boat" to go along. Good luck with that.

As for the crossposters, there are a couple whose posts are worth
reading, and there are more whose posts are the same sort of mindless
idiocy Loogy posts.

Cheers.

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:21:47 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


Add this post by yourself to the list of off topic pot stirring posts.

Crossposting
 

"Raphael" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch

Crossposting
 

Raphael wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


Hell, you've been put out on the curb a dozen times, but the rubbish men
won't get close enough to toss you in the truck. You smell real bad.

Crossposting
 

Eisboch wrote:
"Raphael" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch

If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch




It has nothing to do with my POV. At least half the crossposters don't
share my POV. It has entirely to do with the indisputable fact that this
is not a recreational boating newsgroup anymore, and it doesn't matter
who or what is posted here.

Crossposting
 

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:21:47 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


Add this post by yourself to the list of off topic pot stirring posts.



To bring attention to practices that are disruptive to a NG is very much
on-topic.
Subjects of discussion should be by consensus, not by decree of one
individual.

If Harry didn't engage in the same practices on subjects dear to him, of
which he complains about others, he would have a credible point.

But, he's the biggest offender. And he has lap dogs like you to support
him.

It's a game to him, (and you) that's all. He basically admits it. You
should too.


Eisboch

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Raphael" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch


Not to be an asshole or anything, but I must point out that you let him
suck you into his **** on a daily basis.

Filter him and his supporters. Easy.
--
John H.

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:21:00 -0400, John H. wrote:

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Raphael" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch


Not to be an asshole or anything, but I must point out that you let him
suck you into his **** on a daily basis.

Filter him and his supporters. Easy.


Oh, and 'Good Morning'!
--
John H.

Crossposting
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Raphael" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt
it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch


Not to be an asshole or anything, but I must point out that you let him
suck you into his **** on a daily basis.

Filter him and his supporters. Easy.



You're right. Back into the bin.
It just would be nice to see regular faces in here, discussing subjects of
common interest and not the wacko's dragged in by you know who, just to
disrupt the NG.

For the record, I enjoy reading and conversing with almost all the people
here, on boating subjects or not. Even Harry, when he is not on one of his
obnoxious political crusades. IMO, every post or subject need not be
directly boating related, as long as the subjects are of general interest to
most. If they are not of general interest, the threads or initial post soon
die.

Old school plank owners of Usenet correctly point out the practice or custom
of 100% on-topic posting. The practice originated back in the days of 1200
baud (or less), dial-up, Internet connections where downloading a bunch of
posts would take 10 minutes or more. In those days it was important to
stay completely on topic because otherwise you wasted people's time and
affected telephone bills as they downloaded off topic posts.

Those days are gone. It takes a second now to download the subject headers
of a 100 or more posts. IMO, (and it's only an opinion) the speed and
bandwidth today allows for a relaxation of old Usenet customs. Discussing
varied subjects, of common interest, is not a big deal, in my opinion.
Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.

Eisboch

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.

Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:59:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

To bring attention to practices that are disruptive to a NG is very much
on-topic.

That's true but you and I both know that the individual in question
could give a hoot what other people think. Since I have no further
interest in his abysmal existence, I just pop him into the kill file
under whatever nom du jour he chooses to use.

Crossposting
 

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Raphael" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch

If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.

That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch


Not to be an asshole or anything,

Not to worry; you don't have to work at being an asshole.
Got any more off-topic crap to post here today? Isn't it about time for
more photos of your clonekids?

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Raphael" wrote in message
.. .

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt
it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch


Not to be an asshole or anything, but I must point out that you let him
suck you into his **** on a daily basis.

Filter him and his supporters. Easy.



You're right. Back into the bin.
It just would be nice to see regular faces in here, discussing subjects of
common interest and not the wacko's dragged in by you know who, just to
disrupt the NG.

For the record, I enjoy reading and conversing with almost all the people
here, on boating subjects or not. Even Harry, when he is not on one of his
obnoxious political crusades. IMO, every post or subject need not be
directly boating related, as long as the subjects are of general interest to
most. If they are not of general interest, the threads or initial post soon
die.

Old school plank owners of Usenet correctly point out the practice or custom
of 100% on-topic posting. The practice originated back in the days of 1200
baud (or less), dial-up, Internet connections where downloading a bunch of
posts would take 10 minutes or more. In those days it was important to
stay completely on topic because otherwise you wasted people's time and
affected telephone bills as they downloaded off topic posts.

Those days are gone. It takes a second now to download the subject headers
of a 100 or more posts. IMO, (and it's only an opinion) the speed and
bandwidth today allows for a relaxation of old Usenet customs. Discussing
varied subjects, of common interest, is not a big deal, in my opinion.
Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.

Eisboch



Politics and religion have always been the downfall of this group. We've
all had that discussion many times in the past. The boy in question
isolated himself with more than just politics.


--
John H.

Crossposting
 

Eisboch wrote:
"Raphael" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch

If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch


And quoting him only serves his purpose. No point in doing that.
No point in complaining about him either. Of the thousands of complaints
about Harry that have been posted here, few affect him. Although I did
notice he gets upset when he is called a draft dodging coward. And he
does get a little uptight when we critique his little L.T. boat. ;-)

You are the last person of merit that will talk to him on a regular
basis. I wish you would stop.

Crossposting
 

John H. wrote:



Politics and religion have always been the downfall of this group. We've
all had that discussion many times in the past. The boy in question
isolated himself with more than just politics.



Tell us about your golf game, your travel trailer, your diaper cruises,
your motorcycle adventures, your tribe of grandchildren, your, your,
your...nothing but off-topic posts.

Crossposting
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.

Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:02:49 -0400, WaIIy wrote:

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Raphael" wrote in message
. ..

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Checked the rec.boats newsgroup this morning. 37 new posts

10 are from "regulars" here and are mostly boating related.
27 of them are political cross postings, thanks to Harry.

Eisboch


If we were to leave that sick puppy alone, he might just get bored and
leave.


That would be nice, but given his history over the past 14 years, I doubt
it
will happen soon.
He has an insatiable need to be seen, heard and to spread his political
gospel.

Dragging the other NGs in here by crossposting is just another example of
his hypocrisy and his ill will to those who don't share his POV.

Ironically, he represents everything that is bad in his political
affiliation.

Eisboch


Not to be an asshole or anything, but I must point out that you let him
suck you into his **** on a daily basis.

Filter him and his supporters. Easy.



You're right. Back into the bin.
It just would be nice to see regular faces in here, discussing subjects of
common interest and not the wacko's dragged in by you know who, just to
disrupt the NG.

For the record, I enjoy reading and conversing with almost all the people
here, on boating subjects or not. Even Harry, when he is not on one of his
obnoxious political crusades. IMO, every post or subject need not be
directly boating related, as long as the subjects are of general interest to
most. If they are not of general interest, the threads or initial post soon
die.

Old school plank owners of Usenet correctly point out the practice or custom
of 100% on-topic posting. The practice originated back in the days of 1200
baud (or less), dial-up, Internet connections where downloading a bunch of
posts would take 10 minutes or more. In those days it was important to
stay completely on topic because otherwise you wasted people's time and
affected telephone bills as they downloaded off topic posts.

Those days are gone. It takes a second now to download the subject headers
of a 100 or more posts. IMO, (and it's only an opinion) the speed and
bandwidth today allows for a relaxation of old Usenet customs. Discussing
varied subjects, of common interest, is not a big deal, in my opinion.
Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.

Eisboch



A very reasoned post. Without the hk stuff, it's like sitting around
the dock and discussing a variety of subjects.

If it was limited strictly to boating, the posts would be pretty thin.

Usenet isn't exactly growing.

Don't know if anyone's noticed this,

http://www.comcast.net/newsgroups/

but it may be indicative of what the big guys are doing. Cox is still
'supporting' newsgroups as a 'free service'. Somewhere along the line Cox
excluded newsgroups as part of their 'internet access' for which one pays.

Now that Comcast is discontinuing the service, I wonder how long it will be
before Cox does the same.
--
John H.

Crossposting
 

"jim" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.

Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck bullet
head. ;-)

Doesn't everyone have a DD214?

Crossposting
 

jim wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think, but it's probably too much to realistically expect.

Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)


Ahhh, the over-the-hill old farts continue to live in the uniforms in
which they no longer fit, reminiscing about the good old days when they
had to think even less than they do now, because someone else told them
what to do.

You boys really are The Village People.

Where can you find pleasure
Search the world for treasure
Learn science technology
Where can you begin to make your dreams all come true
On the land or on the sea
Where can you learn to fly
Play in sports and skin dive
Study oceanography
Sign of for the big band
Or sit in the grandstand
When your team and others meet


In the navy
Yes, you can sail the seven seas
In the navy
Yes, you can put your mind at ease
In the navy
Come on now, people, make a stand
In the navy, in the navy
Can't you see we need a hand
In the navy
Come on, protect the motherland
In the navy
Come on and join your fellow man
In the navy
Come on people, and make a stand
In the navy, in the navy, in the navy (in the navy)


They want you, they want you
They want you as a new recruit


If you like adventure
Don't you wait to enter
The recruiting office fast
Don't you hesitate
There is no need to wait
They're signing up new seamen fast
Maybe you are too young
To join up today
Bout don't you worry 'bout a thing
For I'm sure there will be
Always a good navy
Protecting the land and sea


In the navy
Yes, you can sail the seven seas
In the navy
Yes, you can put your mind at ease
In the navy
Come on now, people, make a stand
In the navy, in the navy
Can't you see we need a hand
In the navy
Come on, protect the motherland
In the navy
Come on and join your fellow man
In the navy
Come on people, and make a stand
In the navy, in the navy, in the navy (in the navy)


They want you, they want you
They want you as a new recruit


Who me?


They want you, they want you
They want you as a new recruit


But, but but I'm afraid of water.
Hey, hey look
Man, I get seasick even watchin' it on TV!


They want you, they want you in the navy


Oh my goodness.
What am I gonna do in a submarine?


They want you, they want you in the navy

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.

Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

Wow - that's a relief.

Freakin' Squids...

Crossposting
 

D.Duck wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck bullet
head. ;-)

Doesn't everyone have a DD214?




Some people were smart enough to do something else instead.

Crossposting
 

D.Duck wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck bullet
head. ;-)

Doesn't everyone have a DD214?


A vast majority of the men and some women my age do. Younger folks, not
so much.

Crossposting
 

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.


Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular basis to
further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think, but it's
probably too much to realistically expect.

Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.
--
John H.

Crossposting
 

jim wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think, but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

Doesn't everyone have a DD214?

A vast majority of the men and some women my age do. Younger folks, not
so much.


What war were you instrumental in helping us lose?

Crossposting
 

"Harry the K" wrote in message
. ..
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.


Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?

Crossposting
 

D.Duck wrote:
"Harry the K" wrote in message
. ..
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)
True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.

Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?



For what?

Crossposting
 

Crossposting
 

D.Duck wrote:
"Harry the K" wrote in message
. ..
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)
True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.

Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?

Seems 100% of the blame goes to Johnson and he Tuesday targeting
luncheons. Come in, sit down, have a sandwich and pick a target to bomb
later in the week.

Crossposting
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:43:05 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Harry the K" wrote in message
m...
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.


Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?


He is doing what he does best - dragging folks into his particular gutter
with his 'enticing' conversation.

****, doesn't your filter work?
--
John H.


What filter? I don't use em.

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:43:05 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Harry the K" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.


Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?


He is doing what he does best - dragging folks into his particular gutter
with his 'enticing' conversation.

****, doesn't your filter work?
--
John H.

Crossposting
 

D.Duck wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:43:05 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"Harry the K" wrote in message
. ..
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)
True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.

Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.
Aren't you blaming the wrong people?

He is doing what he does best - dragging folks into his particular gutter
with his 'enticing' conversation.

****, doesn't your filter work?
--
John H.


What filter? I don't use em.


I wish I could rely on my self control to resist the candy Krause offers
to drag us into his pit. Filters work for me. Glad to see that you
don't need them. ;-)

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:10:03 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:43:05 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Harry the K" wrote in message
om...
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.


Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?


He is doing what he does best - dragging folks into his particular gutter
with his 'enticing' conversation.

****, doesn't your filter work?
--
John H.


What filter? I don't use em.


Doesn't Outlook Express have filters? They help those whose body is strong
but will is weak stop getting sucked into the gutter.
--
John H.

Crossposting
 

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:10:03 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:43:05 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"Harry the K" wrote in message
. ..
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)
True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.

Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.
Aren't you blaming the wrong people?

He is doing what he does best - dragging folks into his particular gutter
with his 'enticing' conversation.

****, doesn't your filter work?
--
John H.

What filter? I don't use em.


Doesn't Outlook Express have filters? They help those whose body is strong
but will is weak stop getting sucked into the gutter.


Then there are posters like Herring, who suffer from weak bodies, weak
minds, and weak wills.

How about some more photos of your travel trailer, Herring?

Crossposting
 

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:35:51 -0400, jim wrote:

D.Duck wrote:



What filter? I don't use em.


I wish I could rely on my self control to resist the candy Krause offers
to drag us into his pit. Filters work for me. Glad to see that you
don't need them. ;-)

Hell if he doesn't!
--
John H.

Crossposting
 

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:35:51 -0400, jim wrote:

D.Duck wrote:


What filter? I don't use em.


I wish I could rely on my self control to resist the candy Krause offers
to drag us into his pit. Filters work for me. Glad to see that you
don't need them. ;-)

Hell if he doesn't!



Hey! How about some photos of your golf bag?

Crossposting
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:10:03 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:43:05 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Harry the K" wrote in message
news:jcydndNm8uv2BE7VnZ2dnUVZ_vzinZ2d@comcast. com...
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a
regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those have
a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.


Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?


He is doing what he does best - dragging folks into his particular
gutter
with his 'enticing' conversation.

****, doesn't your filter work?
--
John H.


What filter? I don't use em.


Doesn't Outlook Express have filters? They help those whose body is strong
but will is weak stop getting sucked into the gutter.
--
John H.

Sure OE has filters. If I used them I might miss some of the fun.

Crossposting
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:50:50 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:10:03 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:43:05 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Harry the K" wrote in message
news:jcydndNm8uv2BE7VnZ2dnUVZ_vzinZ2d@comcas t.com...
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:07:15 -0400, jim wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:41:19 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Personal insults, flame wars, threats, or using the NG on a
regular
basis to further one's own agenda should still be off-limits, I
think,
but it's probably too much to realistically expect.
Does this mean that I can't call you and Jim Squids anymore?

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
SO long as you have a DD214 you can say anything you want, no neck
bullet head. ;-)

True. But there are some folks who don't have one. Most of those
have
a
valid reason. Some were just chicken****s. They squawk a lot.


Really funny stuff here. The old farts who lost a major war in
Vietnam
strutting their stuff.

Aren't you blaming the wrong people?


He is doing what he does best - dragging folks into his particular
gutter
with his 'enticing' conversation.

****, doesn't your filter work?
--
John H.


What filter? I don't use em.


Doesn't Outlook Express have filters? They help those whose body is
strong
but will is weak stop getting sucked into the gutter.
--
John H.

Sure OE has filters. If I used them I might miss some of the fun.


I suppose we just have different definitions of fun. Being drug into a
gutter by krause isn't my idea of fun.
--
John H.

He's not dragging me anywhere. He is what he is.