Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Troopergate probe running into new resistance
By STEVE QUINN, Associated Press Writer 23 minutes ago Alaska's investigation into whether Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power, a potentially damaging distraction for John McCain's presidential campaign, ran into intensified resistance Tuesday from state Republican lawmakers who want to end it or delay it past the election. Alaska's House speaker, a Republican who supported the "Troopergate" investigation two months ago, openly questioned its impartiality and raised the possibility of delaying the findings. The surprise maneuver by Rep. John Harris reflected deepening resolve by Republicans to spare Palin embarrassment or worse in the final weeks of the presidential campaign. And it marked a further fraying of a bipartisan consensus, formed by a unanimous panel before Palin became McCain's running mate, that her firing of the state's public safety commissioner justified the ethical investigation. - - - Gotta love the Repubs...stonewall, stonewall, stonewall. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 5:32*pm, A Boater wrote:
Troopergate probe running into new resistance By STEVE QUINN, Associated Press Writer 23 minutes ago Alaska's investigation into whether Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power, a potentially damaging distraction for John McCain's presidential campaign, ran into intensified resistance Tuesday from state Republican lawmakers who want to end it or delay it past the election. Alaska's House speaker, a Republican who supported the "Troopergate" investigation two months ago, openly questioned its impartiality and raised the possibility of delaying the findings. The surprise maneuver by Rep. John Harris reflected deepening resolve by Republicans to spare Palin embarrassment or worse in the final weeks of the presidential campaign. And it marked a further fraying of a bipartisan consensus, formed by a unanimous panel before Palin became McCain's running mate, that her firing of the state's public safety commissioner justified the ethical investigation. - - - Gotta love the Repubs...stonewall, stonewall, stonewall. Damn you people are dumb. The Alaska State Troopers belong to the AFL CIO that has spent $millions on the Obama campaign. Troopergate is a political smear job. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"527_blue_collar_worker" wrote in message
... On Sep 16, 5:32 pm, A Boater wrote: Troopergate probe running into new resistance By STEVE QUINN, Associated Press Writer 23 minutes ago Alaska's investigation into whether Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power, a potentially damaging distraction for John McCain's presidential campaign, ran into intensified resistance Tuesday from state Republican lawmakers who want to end it or delay it past the election. Alaska's House speaker, a Republican who supported the "Troopergate" investigation two months ago, openly questioned its impartiality and raised the possibility of delaying the findings. The surprise maneuver by Rep. John Harris reflected deepening resolve by Republicans to spare Palin embarrassment or worse in the final weeks of the presidential campaign. And it marked a further fraying of a bipartisan consensus, formed by a unanimous panel before Palin became McCain's running mate, that her firing of the state's public safety commissioner justified the ethical investigation. - - - Gotta love the Repubs...stonewall, stonewall, stonewall. Damn you people are dumb. The Alaska State Troopers belong to the AFL CIO that has spent $millions on the Obama campaign. Troopergate is a political smear job. This might almost make a tiny little bit of sense if the Alaska State Troopers, The AFL-CIO or the Obama campaign had anything to do with launching or conducting the investigation. But, the fact that it was initially launched by the very Republicans who are now trying, as a result of desperate pleas from the McCain campaign, to cover it up and make it go away, only highlights who's REALLY dumb here. Take a look in a mirror, Bozo. -- I'm not really anti-Bush . . . I'm really just anti-stupid. I support the right of all Americans to arm bears. The only Bush I trust is my wife's. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
527_blue_collar_worker wrote:
Damn you people are dumb. The Alaska State Troopers belong to the AFL CIO that has spent $millions on the Obama campaign. Troopergate ....is a legitimate BIPARTISAN investigation into Palin's possible abuse of power. What is Palin hiding? If she has done no wrong, why is she stonewalling, KKKwifi? Where is the 'whitey' tape, KKKwifi? Where is the 'Obama calls Palin a Pig' tape, KKKwifi? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "A Boater" wrote in message ... Troopergate probe running into new resistance By STEVE QUINN, Associated Press Writer 23 minutes ago Alaska's investigation into whether Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power, a potentially damaging distraction for John McCain's presidential campaign, ran into intensified resistance Tuesday from state Republican lawmakers who want to end it or delay it past the election. Alaska's House speaker, a Republican who supported the "Troopergate" investigation two months ago, openly questioned its impartiality and raised the possibility of delaying the findings. The surprise maneuver by Rep. John Harris reflected deepening resolve by Republicans to spare Palin embarrassment or worse in the final weeks of the presidential campaign. And it marked a further fraying of a bipartisan consensus, formed by a unanimous panel before Palin became McCain's running mate, that her firing of the state's public safety commissioner justified the ethical investigation. - - - Gotta love the Repubs...stonewall, stonewall, stonewall. How do you say GUILTY! as charged. Clearly is she were innocent and had nothing to hide she would get it behind her as quickly as possible. Palin is just more of the Cheney bull ****. People would be NUTS to elect her and McSame. Had enough of this crap yet? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 6:42*pm, "Bob Eld" wrote:
"A Boater" wrote in message ... Troopergate probe running into new resistance By STEVE QUINN, Associated Press Writer 23 minutes ago Alaska's investigation into whether Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power, a potentially damaging distraction for John McCain's presidential campaign, ran into intensified resistance Tuesday from state Republican lawmakers who want to end it or delay it past the election. Alaska's House speaker, a Republican who supported the "Troopergate" investigation two months ago, openly questioned its impartiality and raised the possibility of delaying the findings. The surprise maneuver by Rep. John Harris reflected deepening resolve by Republicans to spare Palin embarrassment or worse in the final weeks of the presidential campaign. And it marked a further fraying of a bipartisan consensus, formed by a unanimous panel before Palin became McCain's running mate, that her firing of the state's public safety commissioner justified the ethical investigation. - - - Gotta love the Repubs...stonewall, stonewall, stonewall. How do you say GUILTY! as charged. Clearly is she were innocent and had nothing to hide she would get it behind her as quickly as possible. Palin is just more of the Cheney bull ****. People would be NUTS to elect her and McSame. Had enough of this crap yet?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Commissioners are appointedd by the Governor and the Governor can fire them at any time. After a whole year the Commissioner would not hire the 50 extras troopers that he was directed to hire and that is why she fired him. Also when Palin took up the Governor job, she was routinely asked if there were anyone that might harm her or her family and she replied that the trooper Wooten had threatened to put a bullet through her father's head. That alone was reason for firing the trooper but he was not fired. Wooten still has his job and the Democrats and the AFL-CIO are attempting to exploit the dismissal of the commissioner for political gain. Headlines from the troopers' union web site: AFSCME Takes Largest AFL-CIO Delegation to the Democratic National Convention Union Sets Plans for Its Biggest Mobilization Program Ever Washington, DC - The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) is taking the largest delegation in the AFL-CIO to the Democratic National Convention in Denver next week. More than 150 AFSCME members from across the country will serve as delegates, alternates and committee members. AFSCME, widely regarded as America's most politically active and powerful labor union, will host daily caucuses and events for its members that include governors, members of Congress and other special guests. The AFSCME caucus meetings will be held daily beginning Sunday, August 24, through Thursday, August 28. AFSCME President Gerald W. McEntee chairs the AFL-CIO's Political Committee. All caucuses will take place at the Hyatt Regency Denver at the Convention Center: from: http://www.afscme.org/press/20144.cfm Alaska State Trooper's union: ASEA/AFSCME Local 52 Local Juneau Field Office 400 Willoughby Suite 201 Juneau, AK Phone: 907-463-4949 Toll free: 800-478-0049 Fax - 907-463-4950 from: http://www.psea.net/about_staff.shtml |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
527_blue_collar_worker wrote:
Commissioners are appointedd by the Governor and the Governor can fire them at any time. After a whole year the Commissioner would not hire the 50 extras troopers that he was directed to hire and that is why she fired him. LIE. Where is the 'whitey' tape, KKKwifi? Where is the 'Obama calls Palin a Pig' tape, KKKwifi? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Answering a subpoena is not an admission of guilt.
Refusing to answer a subpoena, on the other hand, is to commit a separate crime before a world of witnesses. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 8:15*pm, James Of Tucson wrote:
Answering a subpoena is not an admission of guilt. Refusing to answer a subpoena, on the other hand, is to commit a separate crime before a world of witnesses. The investigation is tainted because the leading Democrat in the investigation, State Senator Hollis French, said the report would be damaging before the report was compiled. And there is more. This investigation has Obama written all over it. ANCHORAGE — Five Republican state lawmakers on Tuesday filed a lawsuit seeking to halt an inquiry into Gov. Sarah Palin’s dismissal of her public safety commissioner, arguing that the Legislature has exceeded its authority by conducting a “McCarthyistic investigation.” The lawsuit, filed in the state’s Superior Court, comes as the McCain- Palin campaign has escalated its involvement in the bipartisan inquiry, providing Ms. Palin’s lawyer with help and mounting a public relations offensive. The legal action marks the most aggressive challenge yet to the two- month-old investigation, which Ms. Palin initially said she would cooperate with. The campaign said Tuesday that it had no involvement in the decision to file the lawsuit. The lawmakers are being represented by a local lawyer, Kevin G. Clarkson, and the Liberty Legal Institute, which is based in Texas and has a history of taking up conservative causes. Hiram Sasser, director of litigation for the institute, said he had not spoken with anyone at the McCain campaign, but was contacted by Mr. Clarkson, who sought him out because of his constitutional expertise. Mr. Sasser’s co-counsel in the case is Kelly J. Shackelford, who founded the institute. He told reporters at the Republican convention that Mr. McCain’s selection of Ms. Palin “resurrected” the party’s social conservative base. The lawsuit, consisting of 26 pages, was filed against two Democrats, State Senator Hollis French, who is overseeing the investigation, and Senator Kim Elton, who is the chairman of the Legislative Council, which voted on July 28 to open the inquiry; and Stephen E. Branchflower, the independent investigator, a former Anchorage prosecutor who now lives in South Carolina. The plaintiffs said they hoped to persuade the Legislative Council, a bipartisan body of House and Senate members who can convene to make decisions when the Legislature is not in session, to drop the inquiry by naming it in the lawsuit. At the heart of the lawsuit is the argument that the inquiry exceeds the Legislature’s constitutional power and that the process has been handled in a politically biased fashion intended to besmirch Ms. Palin’s reputation and affect the outcome of the November elections. “The defendants are conducting a ‘McCarthyistic’ investigation in an unlawful” and “partial and partisan political manner,” the lawsuit said. The ethics case has its roots in Ms. Palin’s decision this summer to dismiss Alaska’s public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, who contends that he was dismissed for refusing to fire Ms. Palin’s former brother-in-law, Mike Wooten, a state trooper. Ms. Palin has denied that, saying his dismissal stemmed from his “insubordination” over budget matters. Tuesday’s lawsuit contends that the investigators have a “predisposition to make findings against Governor Palin” and are manipulating the timing of the inquiry “so as to affect the outcome of elections” by not agreeing to release the report after Nov. 4. Lawmakers have said the report would be completed by Oct. 10 to give both sides ample time to respond. “There is no nonpartisan reason that” the investigation “needs to be completed prior to the election on Nov. 4, 2008,” the lawsuit said. The lawsuit singles out Mr. French and Mr. Elton, pointing out that Mr. Elton gave $2,000 to the Obama campaign and citing comments in which Mr. French called Mr. McCain’s selection of Ms. Palin a “bad choice.” It also accuses Mr. Branchflower of having a conflict of interest because his wife once worked under Mr. Monegan. Mr. Elton said in a written statement that while the lawsuit is a distraction, the investigation would continue. Among the five lawmakers who filed the suit was Representative Wes Keller, an elder in Ms. Palin’s church whom she appointed to his seat. The reaction among their Republican colleagues was mixed. The House Speaker, John Harris, asked the Legislative Council to convene a meeting within the week to discuss the status of the investigation. “What started as a bipartisan and impartial effort is becoming overshadowed by public comments from individuals at both ends of the political spectrum,” Mr. Harris said in a letter to Mr. Elton. State Senate President Lyda Green, a Republican who has frequently clashed with Ms. Palin over policy, said the lawmakers who filed it were all “step-by-step followers” of Ms. Palin. “The McCain campaign is the one that has made this partisan,” Ms. Green said. “This was 100 percent bipartisan effort on the part of the Legislature to ask questions that deserve to be answered.” Ms. Palin’s lawyer has sought to move the investigation to the state Personnel Board, whose members are appointed by the governor for four- year terms. But on Tuesday, Ed O’Callaghan, a former senior Justice Department official advising the campaign and Ms. Palin’s lawyer, said that even if Ms. Palin succeeds she had not yet decided if she would testify. A person briefed on the campaign activities in Anchorage also said that outside lawyers in coordination with the campaign have volunteered legal advice to Ms. Palin’s lawyer. One volunteer left Anchorage on Tuesday and one or two others have been here to plot legal strategy over the past few weeks, the source said. Taylor Griffin, a campaign spokesman, declined to identify the lawyers by name. Meanwhile, in a separate lawsuit also filed Tuesday, a group of private Alaskan citizens, many of whom contribute to Republican candidates, sought to have the investigation thrown out, citing their right as taxpayers to be free of “unauthorized, wasteful and unlawful government spending.” from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/17/us...l?ref=politics |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats,alt.impeach.bush
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"527_blue_collar_worker" wrote in message
... The investigation is tainted because the leading Democrat in the investigation, State Senator Hollis French, said the report would be damaging before the report was compiled. Gee, that's almost as bad as screaming to the world that there was a "Whitey Tape", and assuring everyone that it would be explosive. Except this is far more likely to be true than the innuendo of the "Whitey Tape" was. That said, please explain why Alaska's Republican legislators were not only for this before they were against it, but were actually the ones who initiated it in the first place. Now they're suing to try to stop something that they themselves started. Go figure. No pressure coming from the McCain campaign, right? And there is more. This investigation has Obama written all over it. BWAH HA HA HA HA HA! Obama and his campaign have bent over backwards to distance themselves, as much as they possibly can, from this whole affair! They're not the ones who have spent millions of dollars to send teams of high-priced lawyers up from the "lower 48" to try to influence the outcome of what should be an internal Alaskan affair. That would be the GOP and McCain campaign who would be doing that. -- I'm not really anti-Bush . . . I'm really just anti-stupid. I support the right of all Americans to arm bears. The only Bush I trust is my wife's. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Uh-oh...Troopergate Emails Revealed | General | |||
Help...Reverse makes my boat stall ! | General | |||
1970s 75HP Johnson OB Idle Stall | General |