BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   I'm voting republican because... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/97914-re-im-voting-republican-because.html)

wf3h September 15th 08 06:13 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Sep 14, 11:43*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


....
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....

Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems


Curly Surmudgeon September 15th 08 06:16 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:30:32 -0400, hk wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 10:26:41 -0400, hk wrote:

Eisboch wrote:

I wish sometimes that people representing the left would come up with
some original thoughts or lines instead of parroting the same stuff
they hear in the media, day after day, week after week, month after
month. As Russia reemerges as a world power, terrorists still run
around threatening our lives, the economy is in deep doo-doo .....
the Dems have us focused on lipstick.

Eisboch





Uh...it is Ms. Palin who brought up the lipstick issue and the
Republicans who tried to make a bigger issue of it.

Better the Republicans talk about lipstick than any serious issue.


That is the "Republican Way," to accuse their detractors of their own
tricks and lies. Rove taught them well but it's getting old, htey need
a new trick...


It may be getting old, but you have to remember that the voting bloc
includes millions of Boobus Americanus types who vote Republican because
they like receiving anal intercourse.


No, those are only the leaders. The Republican faithful are well-meaning
people who are typically uneducated, ignorant, christians who believe the
self-appointed snake-oil salesmen who run under the party banner.

The wackos we see here are their fringe elements and can safely be
ignored, except when they're lying too outrageously.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com

-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-


D.Duck September 15th 08 07:04 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:25:59 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:14:43 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...


Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.
Well except at a University.


Most PhD's that I know should have never left the University.

(whoops .... hope ShortWave isn't lurking)

Eisboch

Isn't PhD, Piled Higher and Deeper?

There is a little secret which I will share with you and only you.

It's called "quote early and quote often".

First, you look through the papers of the review committee's, and the
chairman's, papers, books, dissertations and monographs for anything
that even remotely touches on the subject matter for your thesis. And
by remotely, I mean even if you have to make it up remotely.

Then, in your introduction, you make sure you thank, with foot notes
to papers, books, dissertations and monographs (including the chairman
of your department if he isn't serving on the committee) for
clarifying, elucidating and in general assisting you in the
preparation of your thesis and dissertation.

In the body of the dissertation, footnote the hell out of it only make
sure you quote one of the review committee members - the rest must be
real books, papers, dissertations and monographs but if doesn't matter
as long as you use something from everybody on the committee. Make one
page entirely for footnotes for the preceding page and do that every
ten or so pages following the above procedure.

Use graphs, obscure types of data sets and lots and lots of color -
distracts from the fact that most of what you are writing is pure page
filler. If it's not a hard science paper, then use flow charts and
pictographs.

In concluding, make it really short and simple with plenty of praise
for the pioneering back ground work, blah, blah, blah.

And that's how you write a successful dissertation. :)

Why, you might ask, does it work? Pretty simple actually - the morons
on the committee will only look for their due credit and will look
through the bibliography and footnote annotation for references to
their work. They can't very well discredit their own achievement can
they? :)

And before you ask, no - I did not.

Hmmmm, my MSEE was muuuuch easier. 80

Want to know the complete and total truth?

Nobody on the my review committee had a clue about the subject matter
and took the recommendation of the Department Chair as to it's
validity - and she didn't have a clue and had to take the word of one
of the maybe 200 people in the world who actually did understand the
subject.

Absolutely true. :)


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)


Nope - although it might as well have been.

Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


I was just reading about that very subject a few weeks ago. It really
didn't apply to my golf swing so I went on to other things. 8)



Eisboch September 15th 08 08:56 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..


On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)



Nope - although it might as well have been.


Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?

Eisboch



Short Wave Sportfishing[_2_] September 15th 08 11:37 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...


On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)



Nope - although it might as well have been.


Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)

And now, for someting completely different.

For some reason, the rear passenger tire on Mrs.Wave's town car is
flat.

I must analyze this. :)

Short Wave Sportfishing[_2_] September 15th 08 11:38 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:56:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:21:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:59:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:GICdnWCs37yx91DVnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@earthli nk.com...


Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime employment.
Well except at a University.

Most PhD's that I know should have never left the University.

(whoops .... hope ShortWave isn't lurking)

HEY!!!!

Some of us overeducated morons live in the real world you know.

Like this one?
http://ourlighterside.com/stuff/engineer/


Anybody who drives a car with the jet turbine intake sitting less than
a foot from his elbow can not possibly qualify as living in the real
world no matter how you try to define it. :)


Got a screen over the intake. Might be different if he tried to run it at
110% power.


Anybody who drives a car with the jet turbine intake sitting less than
a foot from his elbow can not possibly qualify as living in the real
world no matter how you try to define it. :)

D.Duck September 15th 08 12:17 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...


On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)


Nope - although it might as well have been.


Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)

And now, for someting completely different.

For some reason, the rear passenger tire on Mrs.Wave's town car is
flat.

I must analyze this. :)


I hope it doesn't take you three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of
calculations, graphs, formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing,
printing and presentations to solve the problem.

Let me take a shot, lack of air?



Eisboch September 15th 08 12:19 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...


On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)


Nope - although it might as well have been.


Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)




Rigid or non-rigid?




Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)



What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...

Eisboch



Short Wave Sportfishing[_2_] September 15th 08 12:32 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:19:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)


What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...


Which part - the spherical harmonic maps or the fact that I'm an
idiot? :)

Short Wave Sportfishing[_2_] September 15th 08 12:35 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:17:29 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
om...

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)


Nope - although it might as well have been.

Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)

Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)

And now, for someting completely different.

For some reason, the rear passenger tire on Mrs.Wave's town car is
flat.

I must analyze this. :)


I hope it doesn't take you three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of
calculations, graphs, formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing,
printing and presentations to solve the problem.

Let me take a shot, lack of air?


Potentially yes.

However, it could be metamorphing into a different dimensional form or
even, which would be WAY cool, another universe.

There are theories which can account for that you know. :)

Tim September 15th 08 01:48 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Sep 15, 6:32*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:19:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.


The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.


Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.


Was it worth it? *Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). *:)


What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...


Which part - the spherical harmonic maps or the fact that I'm an
idiot? *:)


If you are the latter, yo can understand the former...

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. September 15th 08 01:58 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 
Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Anything to do with Klingons? 8)
Nope - although it might as well have been.
Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)



Rigid or non-rigid?



Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)



What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...

Eisboch



No one does, including SWS. ;)


A Boater September 15th 08 02:00 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Anything to do with Klingons? 8)
Nope - although it might as well have been.
Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)



Rigid or non-rigid?



Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)



What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are
talking about ...

Eisboch


No one does, including SWS. ;)



Another off-topic "discussion" in rec.boats

Calif Bill September 15th 08 08:45 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....

Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems


I referred to Congress.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm

1 in 3 makes over a million a year.



Calif Bill September 15th 08 08:50 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...


On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)


Nope - although it might as well have been.


Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)

And now, for someting completely different.

For some reason, the rear passenger tire on Mrs.Wave's town car is
flat.

I must analyze this. :)


Would not all Hyperbolic surfaces be non parabolic?

What I am analysing is the brakes on the boat trailer. Just bleed them a
week ago and now no brakes again. Found a cracked bleeder seat. Now to
find a new seat adapter. Brass on Kodiak Disk Brakes.



Calif Bill September 15th 08 08:51 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"A Boater" wrote in message
...
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in
message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Anything to do with Klingons? 8)
Nope - although it might as well have been.
Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)



What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are
talking about ...

Eisboch


No one does, including SWS. ;)



Another off-topic "discussion" in rec.boats


Maybe the surface boats transit are Hyperbolic Reimen Surfaces?



Calif Bill September 15th 08 08:52 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:56:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:21:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:59:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:GICdnWCs37yx91DVnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@earthl ink.com...


Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.
Well except at a University.

Most PhD's that I know should have never left the University.

(whoops .... hope ShortWave isn't lurking)

HEY!!!!

Some of us overeducated morons live in the real world you know.

Like this one?
http://ourlighterside.com/stuff/engineer/

Anybody who drives a car with the jet turbine intake sitting less than
a foot from his elbow can not possibly qualify as living in the real
world no matter how you try to define it. :)


Got a screen over the intake. Might be different if he tried to run it at
110% power.


Anybody who drives a car with the jet turbine intake sitting less than
a foot from his elbow can not possibly qualify as living in the real
world no matter how you try to define it. :)


Phd. ;}



wf3h September 15th 08 09:37 PM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Sep 15, 2:45*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


....
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


....
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....


Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems

I referred to Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm

1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


as i said, it depends on what year

and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.

Calif Bill September 16th 08 12:08 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 15, 2:45 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....


Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems

I referred to Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm

1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


as i said, it depends on what year

and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.

I said Congress at first. You are the one who has comprehension problems.



wf3h September 16th 08 01:03 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Sep 15, 6:08*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 15, 2:45 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


....
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....


Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems


I referred to Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm


1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


as i said, it depends on what year

and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.

I said Congress at first. *You are the one who has comprehension problems.-


if you could read, instead of having someone read this to you, you'd
be a democrat, not a hezbollah member

Calif Bill September 16th 08 04:30 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 15, 6:08 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 15, 2:45 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You
get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on
the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....


Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems


I referred to
Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm


1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


as i said, it depends on what year

and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.

I said Congress at first. You are the one who has comprehension problems.-


if you could read, instead of having someone read this to you, you'd
be a democrat, not a hezbollah member

Actually I am a Democrat. But the party is not the party I joined years
ago. JFK would be a Moderate Republican now.



wf3h September 16th 08 04:37 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 
On Sep 15, 10:30*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 15, 6:08 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 15, 2:45 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


....
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You
get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on
the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....


Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems


I referred to
Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm


1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


as i said, it depends on what year


and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.


I said Congress at first. You are the one who has comprehension problems.-


if you could read, instead of having someone read this to you, you'd
be a democrat, not a hezbollah member

Actually I am a Democrat. *But the party is not the party I joined years
ago. *JFK would be a Moderate Republican now.-


so did you just recover from being flatlined? because the republican
party sure as hell isnt the same one that goldwater led at the same
time.

the GOP turned into the most virulent, racist organization since the
KKK during the 60's. in fact, when johnson signed the voting rights
act of 1964, giving blacks the right to vote....he said 'i think we
just handed the south to the republicans for the next generation'. he
was right; the GOP became the party of hate

so, yes, you DO fit right into the GOP.

Calif Bill September 16th 08 07:25 AM

I'm voting republican because...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 15, 10:30 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 15, 6:08 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 15, 2:45 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message


...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:


companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You
get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get
lifetime
employment.


sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then
the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed


How about rich DNC contributors?


you mean both of them?


More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on
the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.


DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....


Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems


I referred to
Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm


1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


as i said, it depends on what year


and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.


I said Congress at first. You are the one who has comprehension
problems.-


if you could read, instead of having someone read this to you, you'd
be a democrat, not a hezbollah member

Actually I am a Democrat. But the party is not the party I joined years
ago. JFK would be a Moderate Republican now.-


so did you just recover from being flatlined? because the republican
party sure as hell isnt the same one that goldwater led at the same
time.

the GOP turned into the most virulent, racist organization since the
KKK during the 60's. in fact, when johnson signed the voting rights
act of 1964, giving blacks the right to vote....he said 'i think we
just handed the south to the republicans for the next generation'. he
was right; the GOP became the party of hate

so, yes, you DO fit right into the GOP.

You are absolutely stupid. The GOP help was required to pass the 1964 Civil
Rights Act. Your belove Al Gore's daddy, was against the bill and started
the Dixiecrats. And blacks had the right to vote a long time before 1964.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com