wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
news
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously. The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed by an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing, semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26% of the
people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was almost done
because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than they produced. Only
thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and the Cotton Gin. Made
it financially viable to own slaves. Most of the country was built on the
backs of regular working people! Actually the misfits who populated this
country and took chances building a life for themselves were the builders of
this country. Do you say England was build on slavery? Was legal there
until about 1833.


WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
news On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26% of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.

WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!

Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
news On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?

This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?
Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26% of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.
WOW are YOU ever in denial.



He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!



Slavery and indentured servitude were what made some colonists and
citizens rich and built some of our early infrastructure, and let's not
forget child labor and sweatshops. The haves have always exploited the
have-nots in this country.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
news On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed
by an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?

This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It
is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?
Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26%
of the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than
they produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli
Whitney and the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves.
Most of the country was built on the backs of regular working people!
Actually the misfits who populated this country and took chances
building a life for themselves were the builders of this country. Do
you say England was build on slavery? Was legal there until about
1833.
WOW are YOU ever in denial.



He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not
have built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!

Slavery and indentured servitude were what made some colonists and
citizens rich and built some of our early infrastructure, and let's not
forget child labor and sweatshops. The haves have always exploited the
have-nots in this country.

The haves have always exploited the have-nots in every country.

On Sep 10, 9:13*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

You are Salty are the non rational people. *You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. *Un-fricken-believable!-

Here is a possible solution for you, not sure if you saw this thread
yet..

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...34881f48773a0#

If so, sorry for bringing it up again, but it seems to be working
well, even some old faces are showing up and staying on...

wrote:
On Sep 10, 9:13 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!-

Here is a possible solution for you, not sure if you saw this thread
yet..

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...34881f48773a0#

If so, sorry for bringing it up again, but it seems to be working
well, even some old faces are showing up and staying on...


Working well means virtually no posts, and even fewer informative or
interesting boating-related posts, but we did learn today that even with
lessons Herring can't play golf and is still planning to move sometime
to the Carolinas.

The question is, when JustWait bounces that boat off its trailer, will
it crack? :)

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:11:47 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 10, 9:13*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

You are Salty are the non rational people. *You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. *Un-fricken-believable!-

Here is a possible solution for you, not sure if you saw this thread
yet..

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...34881f48773a0#

If so, sorry for bringing it up again, but it seems to be working
well, even some old faces are showing up and staying on...

Thanks for the attention, Scotty-Potty! I realize you had to go back
on your word to mention me in a post, so I really apprciate it!

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
news On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26% of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.

WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!


alcohol is clearly not your friend.

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
news On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed
by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It
is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26%
of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than
they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of
the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually
the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life
for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.

WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!


alcohol is clearly not your friend.


That your excuse. I rarely drink and never to excess as you seem to
constantly do.

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:38:06 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
om...
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
news On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed
by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It
is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26%
of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than
they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of
the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually
the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life
for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.

WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!


alcohol is clearly not your friend.


That your excuse. I rarely drink and never to excess as you seem to
constantly do.


Wrong yet again. I don't drink at all. None, nada, zip.