"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:26:20 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, Eisboch wrote:



Fair taxes on that earned or created wealth is fine. But a
redistribution of wealth by government edict is not. To do so is
socialism or communism, plain and simple.

Eisboch

LOL, that would depend on which way the wealth is being redistributed,
wouldn't it?

http://www.sustainablemiddleclass.co...efficient.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient

That "redistribution" BS should be turned upside down by the Dems,
given what I always hear about the "middle class" not even keeping up
with inflation while "the rich get richer."
But they have turned into a "wealthy" Yuppie party, and have no balls.
Their base won't get fired up or expanded as long as they have cable
TV and food on the table.
All this "redistribution of wealth" talk is pure political bull****
anyway.
Bottom line is everybody fights for economic spoils. Who wins the
fight is determined by their fighting heart, ambition, love of money,
or survival.
Used to be workers wanted better work conditions and more money
for food on the table, so they organized and raised hell. Now they
watch cable TV if they get frustrated.
But if they get hungry and can't afford cable TV, watch out.
In the end all the "redistribution" talk is pure bull****, whether
from Eisboch or Harry. Most people get exactly what they deserve.
But remember - that's just my current opinion.
I am flexible, and perfectly willing to flip-flop.

--Vic


Well, I sincerely hope you flip rather than flop.

Eisboch