Great article!
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed
by an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?

This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It
is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?
Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26%
of the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than
they produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli
Whitney and the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves.
Most of the country was built on the backs of regular working people!
Actually the misfits who populated this country and took chances
building a life for themselves were the builders of this country. Do
you say England was build on slavery? Was legal there until about
1833.
WOW are YOU ever in denial.



He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not
have built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!

Slavery and indentured servitude were what made some colonists and
citizens rich and built some of our early infrastructure, and let's not
forget child labor and sweatshops. The haves have always exploited the
have-nots in this country.

The haves have always exploited the have-nots in every country.

Great article!
 

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed
by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It
is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26%
of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than
they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of
the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually
the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life
for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.

WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!


alcohol is clearly not your friend.


That your excuse. I rarely drink and never to excess as you seem to
constantly do.

Great article!
 

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:38:06 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
om...
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be financed
by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have earned
their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It
is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only 26%
of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than
they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of
the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually
the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life
for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.

WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!


alcohol is clearly not your friend.


That your excuse. I rarely drink and never to excess as you seem to
constantly do.


Wrong yet again. I don't drink at all. None, nada, zip.

Great article!
 

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:


Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first.

And, Over half of all white immigrants to the English colonies of North
America during the 17th and 18th centuries consisted of indentured
servants.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servant

And only 26% of the people in NC owned slaves.

Yeah, but 29% of the total population in the upper south, were slaves.
47% in the lower south.

http://members.aol.com/Jfepperson/stat.html

Great article!
 

On Sep 10, 11:35*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:53:47 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:





I saw a boston Whaler down in the keys (Grassy Key campground) that
they had cut off most of the bow rise and glassed in a flat deck to
use as a fish guts dumping boat. They had a horizontal fin across the
front for the same reason. This thing would hook a wave and go under
but the fin popped the bow back up.
I thought the same idea would work on a pontoon. I know I have been
caught out in mine and they do tend to *want to "dive and level off at
periscope depth" when the forward deck goes under. The ones with the
playpen all the way forward just crash into the sea and drown you. I
have seen the sheet metal blown out of the track. Usually what happens
is they pitch down so bad the prop comes out of the water and you pop
backwards. You can get around it by quartering the sea and
ballasting/motoring your boat to hold the fore most pontoon as high as
you can get it. It is still going to be a wet ride because when that
corner comes up it throws a bucket of water over everyone. You can get
back OK if you take it slow and easy, trying to work with the sea, and
not fight it too much.

Yes, the high wind waves can be troublesome. In those situations,
would a tri-toon be better?

I imagine they give you a bit more flotation up front but the problem
is when the deck goes under it becomes a dive plane.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's what I was wondering if the center toon would help eliminate
that by giving better fotation to the bow.

OT: Great article!
 

Don White wrote:


Didn't Bush give a tax cut to the 'rich' last time?
It's the working mans turn now.


As I recall, "Bush's tax cut" went to everybody who paid taxes.
"Cutting" the taxes of those who don't pay any, i.e. the recent
"stimulus package" checks, amounts to nothing short of welfare. The only
way the "rich" can support this country by themselves is to redefine
"rich" to be anybody who has two cents to rub together.

TJ

Great article!
 

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:38:06 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
news:fZKdnZmjKfN8vVXVnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@comcast. com...
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:50:15 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:16:46 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
You need to change your hearing aid batteries. The redistribution
O'Reilly
talked about is the redistribution Obama talks about
continuously.
The
middle class tax cut (which we know is bull****) would be
financed
by
an
upper income tax increase.

If that's not redistribution, what is. Obama's answer to
O'Reilly's
question was, "We can afford it." Why should those who have
earned
their
money give it away?


This is one of the most important faults of the left wing,
semi-socialist
Obama economic theory.

A person (or persons) who go out and create something of value
don't
do so
at the expense of those that don't or can't.
There is no finite amount of value or wealth to be "grabbed". It
is
created.
Oh bull****. Do you deny that slavery was used to build this
country
from the beginning?

Nope. Slavery was mostly indentured servants at first. And only
26%
of
the people in NC owned slaves. A minority of people. Slavery was
almost done because of the finances. Cost more to own a slave than
they
produced. Only thing that kept slavery in the end was Eli Whitney
and
the Cotton Gin. Made it financially viable to own slaves. Most of
the
country was built on the backs of regular working people! Actually
the
misfits who populated this country and took chances building a life
for
themselves were the builders of this country. Do you say England
was
build on slavery? Was legal there until about 1833.

WOW are YOU ever in denial.




He must have been programmed. No rational person could believe that
pile
of bull****.


You are Salty are the non rational people. You mean the US would not
have
built without slavery. Un-fricken-believable!


alcohol is clearly not your friend.


That your excuse. I rarely drink and never to excess as you seem to
constantly do.


Wrong yet again. I don't drink at all. None, nada, zip.


React with your drug intake?