New emission standards
 

Final EPA specs for new emission control requirements on boats. Gasoline
engine requirements take effect on new boats in 2010.
Some diesel requirements take effect this year.

Buy now and avoid the rush.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/marinesi.htm

Eisboch

New emission standards
 

On Sep 9, 9:29*am, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:13:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Final EPA specs for new emission control requirements on boats. * Gasoline
engine requirements take effect on new boats in 2010.
Some diesel requirements take effect this year.

Buy now and avoid the rush.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/marinesi.htm

Eisboch

I wonder how this compares to the emission standards they already have
for four strokes. I know my 4 stroke seems a lot cleaner than the
classic 2 strokes if the smell and lack of smoke is any indication.

Really, just like the vehicle standards.. I hear adds for these new
hybreds and "fuel efficient" cars that get 22-24 mpg.. Crap, most of
my old cars and trucks from the 70's and 80's could do thatl;)

New emission standards
 

wrote in message
...
On Sep 9, 9:29 am, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:13:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Final EPA specs for new emission control requirements on boats. Gasoline
engine requirements take effect on new boats in 2010.
Some diesel requirements take effect this year.

Buy now and avoid the rush.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/marinesi.htm

Eisboch

I wonder how this compares to the emission standards they already have
for four strokes. I know my 4 stroke seems a lot cleaner than the
classic 2 strokes if the smell and lack of smoke is any indication.

Really, just like the vehicle standards.. I hear adds for these new
hybreds and "fuel efficient" cars that get 22-24 mpg.. Crap, most of
my old cars and trucks from the 70's and 80's could do thatl;)

I believe that is big hybrid suvs that previous got mileage in the teens.
Few vehicles from the 60s and 70s approached the size of someof the trucks
and suvs today. It's funny to see a 30 year old full size truck next to a
Tundra double cab. The Tundra dwarfs it. The smaller hybrids get mileage
that nothing form the 70s or 80s even approached. My wife's department has
hybrid prius that she recently took to DC from Raleigh on a trip. It
averaged way over 40 mpg overall. That's including the highway portion of
the trip where you would expect a hybrid to not do better than conventional
engines.

New emission standards
 

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:13:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Final EPA specs for new emission control requirements on boats. Gasoline
engine requirements take effect on new boats in 2010.
Some diesel requirements take effect this year.

Buy now and avoid the rush.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/marinesi.htm

Eisboch

I wonder how this compares to the emission standards they already have
for four strokes. I know my 4 stroke seems a lot cleaner than the
classic 2 strokes if the smell and lack of smoke is any indication.

I think you are going to see catalytic converters to meet the new emission
standards. Even small lawn mower engines will have them.

Eisboch

New emission standards
 

On Sep 9, 9:40*am, wrote:
On Sep 9, 9:29*am, wrote:

On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:13:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Final EPA specs for new emission control requirements on boats. * Gasoline
engine requirements take effect on new boats in 2010.
Some diesel requirements take effect this year.

Buy now and avoid the rush.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/marinesi.htm

Eisboch

I wonder how this compares to the emission standards they already have
for four strokes. I know my 4 stroke seems a lot cleaner than the
classic 2 strokes if the smell and lack of smoke is any indication.

Really, just like the vehicle standards.. I hear adds for these new
hybreds and "fuel efficient" cars that get 22-24 mpg.. Crap, most of
my old cars and trucks from the 70's and 80's could do thatl;)

Not mine! But then again, I went for horsepower and usually had my
foot trying to push throught the firewall.

New emission standards
 

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:05:52 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


I think you are going to see catalytic converters to meet the new
emission standards. Even small lawn mower engines will have them.

Eisboch

Might be a fire hazard on lawn mowers. Those catalytic converters are
quite hot. Still, lawn mowers are quite dirty by today's standards.

"The 20,000,000 small engines sold in the U.S. each year contribute about
one tenth of the total U.S. mobile source hydrocarbon emissions, and are
the largest single contributor to these non-road emissions."

http://www.mindfully.org/Air/Lawn-Mower-Pollution.htm

New emission standards
 

On Sep 9, 11:05*am, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:05:52 -0400, Eisboch wrote:
I think you are going to see catalytic converters to meet the new
emission standards. * Even small lawn mower engines will have them.

Eisboch

Might be a fire hazard on lawn mowers. *Those catalytic converters are
quite hot. *

I seen a house burned to the ground because they were having a family
reunion and parked in the grass. One parked in the deep grass and
caught it on fire.

New emission standards
 

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:14:35 -0400, wrote:

I used to autocross using highly modified Fiat 600's, among other
cars. In stock form, with 27 screaming horsepower, they cruised on the
highway at 55 mph and 60 mpg. Accelerating from zero to 60, however
took about two days.

That's the advantage of the hybrid. When you need extra power for
acceleration, the electric kicks in.

New emission standards
 

wrote in message
t...
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:05:52 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


I think you are going to see catalytic converters to meet the new
emission standards. Even small lawn mower engines will have them.

Eisboch

Might be a fire hazard on lawn mowers. Those catalytic converters are
quite hot. Still, lawn mowers are quite dirty by today's standards.

"The 20,000,000 small engines sold in the U.S. each year contribute about
one tenth of the total U.S. mobile source hydrocarbon emissions, and are
the largest single contributor to these non-road emissions."

http://www.mindfully.org/Air/Lawn-Mower-Pollution.htm


Check this out. You may have to retrofit your current lawnmower with a
catalytic converter.

http://lawn-mowers.gardeningtipsnide...onverters.html

Eisboch

New emission standards
 

On Sep 9, 11:56*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message

t...





On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:05:52 -0400, Eisboch wrote:

I think you are going to see catalytic converters to meet the new
emission standards. * Even small lawn mower engines will have them.

Eisboch

Might be a fire hazard on lawn mowers. *Those catalytic converters are
quite hot. *Still, lawn mowers are quite dirty by today's standards.

"The 20,000,000 small engines sold in the U.S. each year contribute about
one tenth of the total U.S. mobile source hydrocarbon emissions, and are
the largest single contributor to these non-road emissions."

http://www.mindfully.org/Air/Lawn-Mower-Pollution.htm

Check this out. *You may have to retrofit your current lawnmower with a
catalytic converter.

http://lawn-mowers.gardeningtipsnide..._mower_catalyt...

Eisboch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Looks like I'll have to put the muffler back on my lawn tractor, too!

New emission standards
 

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:06:17 -0400, wrote:

I'm not sure the electric in most hybrids kicks in for acceleration at
highway speeds. I think it's used mostly in low speed, stop and go,
city driving.

I know that stop and go is supposed to be hybrid's strong point but I
haven't heard anything about the electric not working at highway
speeds. Short bursts of power is ideal for battery/electric.

It only takes 20 to 30 hp to keep a small to mid-size car rolling at
highway speed so the only reason for paying the overhead of a large
engine is acceleration.

New emission standards
 

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:12:32 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:05:52 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:13:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Final EPA specs for new emission control requirements on boats. Gasoline
engine requirements take effect on new boats in 2010.
Some diesel requirements take effect this year.

Buy now and avoid the rush.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/marinesi.htm

Eisboch

I wonder how this compares to the emission standards they already have
for four strokes. I know my 4 stroke seems a lot cleaner than the
classic 2 strokes if the smell and lack of smoke is any indication.

I think you are going to see catalytic converters to meet the new emission
standards. Even small lawn mower engines will have them.

Eisboch


I read an article in a fairly reputable magazine (Scientific
American?) that said emission controls may actually contribute to
global warming. The smog we used to have reflects heat back into
space.

So now instead of dying by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we'll
drown..****, I'm going to start smoking again, or learn to walk on water.

New emission standards
 

wrote in message
...
On Sep 9, 11:05 am, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:05:52 -0400, Eisboch wrote:
I think you are going to see catalytic converters to meet the new
emission standards. Even small lawn mower engines will have them.

Eisboch

Might be a fire hazard on lawn mowers. Those catalytic converters are
quite hot.

I seen a house burned to the ground because they were having a family
reunion and parked in the grass. One parked in the deep grass and
caught it on fire.

The first Cat's ran really hot, and started a lot of fires. They found out
that they worked just as well running a lot less temperature. The newer
ones run a lot cooler.

New emission standards
 

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:05:52 -0400, John H wrote:

I read an article in a fairly reputable magazine (Scientific
American?) that said emission controls may actually contribute to
global warming. The smog we used to have reflects heat back into
space.

So now instead of dying by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we'll
drown..****, I'm going to start smoking again, or learn to walk on water.

Why would we drown? Don't we all have boats?

We might be subjected to a Waterworld. Death by bad movie.

New emission standards
 

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:53:30 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:05:52 -0400, John H wrote:

I read an article in a fairly reputable magazine (Scientific
American?) that said emission controls may actually contribute to
global warming. The smog we used to have reflects heat back into
space.

So now instead of dying by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we'll
drown..****, I'm going to start smoking again, or learn to walk on water.

Why would we drown? Don't we all have boats?

Right. Now it's back to COPD.

New emission standards
 

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:34:30 -0400, wrote:

In Connecticut, the highways and parkways have lots of hills, so it
takes quite a bit more than 30 hp to maintain speed!

Oh yes, I well remember our days of zooming up and down the hills of
the Merit Parkway with a fully loaded, 40 hp, diesel Rabbit. You had
to drive it like a heavy truck, gaining enough momentum downhill to
carry you up the next one, foot to the floor most of the time.

I tend to agree with the conclusion that hybrids are not cost
effective for highway driving even if you can get an acceleration
boost when you need it. You are toting around the weight and cost of
the technology but only using it for short periods.

New emission standards
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:34:30 -0400, wrote:

In Connecticut, the highways and parkways have lots of hills, so it
takes quite a bit more than 30 hp to maintain speed!

Oh yes, I well remember our days of zooming up and down the hills of
the Merit Parkway with a fully loaded, 40 hp, diesel Rabbit. You had
to drive it like a heavy truck, gaining enough momentum downhill to
carry you up the next one, foot to the floor most of the time.

I tend to agree with the conclusion that hybrids are not cost
effective for highway driving even if you can get an acceleration
boost when you need it. You are toting around the weight and cost of
the technology but only using it for short periods.


I am confirming something that I guess I always knew in theory, but rarely
applied in practice.
The goofy toy my son and I bought together .... the Caddy Limo .... has the
32 or 34 valve V8 engine.
I don't know much about the Caddy engines, so I don't know it's displacement
or horsepower.

However, because it's a Limo, you tend to drive it very conservatively. No
fast starts ... mainly because it can't .... and nice, easy acceleration and
deceleration for a comfortable ride for whoever the passengers may be.

After a week or so of driving a mix of around town and highway miles (65-70
mph) I was amazed to find that it gets around 17 mpg overall. That's
better than my little 6 cylinder Ford Ranger.

I suspect the halfway decent mileage (for a big vehicle) is due to the
conservative driving style more than engine design.

Eisboch

New emission standards
 

Eisboch wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:34:30 -0400, wrote:

In Connecticut, the highways and parkways have lots of hills, so it
takes quite a bit more than 30 hp to maintain speed!
Oh yes, I well remember our days of zooming up and down the hills of
the Merit Parkway with a fully loaded, 40 hp, diesel Rabbit. You had
to drive it like a heavy truck, gaining enough momentum downhill to
carry you up the next one, foot to the floor most of the time.

I tend to agree with the conclusion that hybrids are not cost
effective for highway driving even if you can get an acceleration
boost when you need it. You are toting around the weight and cost of
the technology but only using it for short periods.


I am confirming something that I guess I always knew in theory, but rarely
applied in practice.
The goofy toy my son and I bought together .... the Caddy Limo .... has the
32 or 34 valve V8 engine.
I don't know much about the Caddy engines, so I don't know it's displacement
or horsepower.

However, because it's a Limo, you tend to drive it very conservatively. No
fast starts ... mainly because it can't .... and nice, easy acceleration and
deceleration for a comfortable ride for whoever the passengers may be.

After a week or so of driving a mix of around town and highway miles (65-70
mph) I was amazed to find that it gets around 17 mpg overall. That's
better than my little 6 cylinder Ford Ranger.

I suspect the halfway decent mileage (for a big vehicle) is due to the
conservative driving style more than engine design.

Eisboch


There you go. Cut the top off and make a long bed pickup out of it.