So, who is in?
 

Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. 09/08/08 09:19



Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 9:23*am, wrote:
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. * 09/08/08 *09:19

Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Yup!

So, who is in?
 

wrote in message
...
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. 09/08/08 09:19



Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

I'm in.

So, who is in?
 

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. 09/08/08 09:19

Arent you a little ahead of yourself ? Nice date job.......

So, who is in?
 

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 06:23:36 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. 09/08/08 09:19



Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Absolutely. But let's forget the week and make it permanent!

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 10:54*am, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 06:23:36 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. * 09/08/08 *09:19

Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Absolutely. But let's forget the week and make it permanent!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll try for a week and see who is in... Then we can adjust
accordingly... With an initial one week trial, anyone who is
concerened with the group can try it, and not feel bad if they choose
to revert after the trial period.. Kinda' like having a few days to
cancel a timeshare;) Just joking John, but you already know that;)

So, who is in?
 

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 10:54*am, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 06:23:36 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. * 09/08/08 *09:19

Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Absolutely. But let's forget the week and make it permanent!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll try for a week and see who is in... Then we can adjust
accordingly... With an initial one week trial, anyone who is
concerened with the group can try it, and not feel bad if they choose
to revert after the trial period.. Kinda' like having a few days to
cancel a timeshare;) Just joking John, but you already know that;)

I'm thinking we can save ourselves a headache just by going over to Chuck's
Place. Eventually Chuck will reach the same conclusion Tom and Dick have.
It's just a matter of time. In the meantime folks can use Scraping the
Bottom if one must get into politics. At least Chuck will, hopefully, keep
some of the more flagrant name calling out.

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 11:30*am, leo wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





On Sep 8, 10:54*am, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 06:23:36 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. * 09/08/08 *09:19

Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Absolutely. But let's forget the week and make it permanent!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll try for a week and see who is in... Then we can adjust
accordingly... With an initial one week trial, anyone who is
concerened with the group can try it, and not feel bad if they choose
to revert after the trial period.. Kinda' like having a few days to
cancel a timeshare;) *Just joking John, but you already know that;)

I'm thinking we can save ourselves a headache just by going over to Chuck's
Place. Eventually Chuck will reach the same conclusion Tom and Dick have.
It's just a matter of time. In the meantime folks can use Scraping the
Bottom if one must get into politics. At least Chuck will, hopefully, keep
some of the more flagrant name calling out.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Might work for some, but the place is difficult to navigate and follow
sometimes.. Anyway, as to "this" place and this thread, are you in or
not?

So, who is in?
 

I'm in!

wrote in message
...
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. 09/08/08 09:19



Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

So, who is in?
 

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 11:30*am, leo wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





On Sep 8, 10:54*am, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 06:23:36 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. * 09/08/08 *09:19

Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Absolutely. But let's forget the week and make it permanent!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll try for a week and see who is in... Then we can adjust
accordingly... With an initial one week trial, anyone who is
concerened with the group can try it, and not feel bad if they choose
to revert after the trial period.. Kinda' like having a few days to
cancel a timeshare;) *Just joking John, but you already know that;)

I'm thinking we can save ourselves a headache just by going over to Chuck's
Place. Eventually Chuck will reach the same conclusion Tom and Dick have.
It's just a matter of time. In the meantime folks can use Scraping the
Bottom if one must get into politics. At least Chuck will, hopefully, keep
some of the more flagrant name calling out.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Might work for some, but the place is difficult to navigate and follow
sometimes.. Anyway, as to "this" place and this thread, are you in or
not?

Absolutely.

With regards to Chuck's, I just go through the most recent 50. If there's
something there worthy of a comment, OK. If not, that's OK too.

So, who is in?
 

So, who is in?
 

"leo" wrote in message
...
I'm thinking we can save ourselves a headache just by going over to
Chuck's
Place. Eventually Chuck will reach the same conclusion Tom and Dick have.
It's just a matter of time. In the meantime folks can use Scraping the
Bottom if one must get into politics. At least Chuck will, hopefully, keep
some of the more flagrant name calling out.

~~ Snerk ~~
The last time the motley crew went over there, a number of them were
"binned".
They just couldn't function in polite company.

So, who is in?
 

Don White wrote:
"leo" wrote in message
...
I'm thinking we can save ourselves a headache just by going over to
Chuck's
Place. Eventually Chuck will reach the same conclusion Tom and Dick have.
It's just a matter of time. In the meantime folks can use Scraping the
Bottom if one must get into politics. At least Chuck will, hopefully, keep
some of the more flagrant name calling out.

~~ Snerk ~~
The last time the motley crew went over there, a number of them were
"binned".
They just couldn't function in polite company.




There's one active thread in there now that actually has some useful
boating info. So far, "leo" has not contributed anything helpful, and
neither have Loogy, JustWait, and most of the rest of the Seven Schitts.

So, who is in?
 

Don White wrote:
"leo" wrote in message
...
I'm thinking we can save ourselves a headache just by going over to
Chuck's
Place. Eventually Chuck will reach the same conclusion Tom and Dick have.
It's just a matter of time. In the meantime folks can use Scraping the
Bottom if one must get into politics. At least Chuck will, hopefully, keep
some of the more flagrant name calling out.

~~ Snerk ~~
The last time the motley crew went over there, a number of them were
"binned".
They just couldn't function in polite company.



Who holds the record for being binned Donnie!

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 12:13*pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

[ Snip ]



Are you in?

Scott, set the example and don't respond to either one of them.

I am in, are you?

So, who is in?
 

So, who is in?
 

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 06:23:36 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. 09/08/08 09:19



Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

A week? You think rec.boats fell apart in a week? Make your pledge for
a YEAR, if you mean business, are really serious, and REALLY want
things to change. Otherwise, you are just making useless noise again.

A week? What a joke. Sounds like a typical right winger feeble
solution.

So, who is in?
 

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:13:49 -0400, BAR wrote:

wrote:
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

[ Snip ]

Are you in?

Scott, set the example and don't respond to either one of them.


He already failed multiple times. Forget it. As long as Scotty has
access to usenet, he'll be posting about Harry. He cannot stop. He's
too much of a pussy to completely stop. When he tries to stop, he
posts about stopping and responds to other people who can't stop.

So, who is in?
 

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:08:40 -0400, BAR wrote:

wrote:
On Sep 8, 12:13 pm, BAR wrote:
wrote:
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...
[ Snip ]



Are you in?
Scott, set the example and don't respond to either one of them.

I am in, are you?

I just binned the three little idiots and salted them.

Yeah, but even this post mentions Harry! You ****s are HOPELESS.

So, who is in?
 

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 8:23*am, wrote:
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. * 09/08/08 *09:19

Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

I'm in, with the exception that when my plaintiff action is served
upon WAFA, I'll post a link here with no editorial comment.

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 10:35*pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:

Are you in?

I'm in, with the exception that when my plaintiff action is served
upon WAFA, I'll post a link here with no editorial comment.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The idea is not to address them, mention, them, answer them, period..
in or out.. So if you think you are really in, glad to add you to the
list, posts such as the one you just made are not really in, but
hopefully you took you final shot.... I think JohnH fell out already
with a post to Donnie, earlier.. too bad..

So, who is in?
 

After talking with Scott this afternoon ( a good lengthy telephone
conversation I might add)

he knows my position.

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 10:58*pm, Tim wrote:
After talking with Scott this afternoon ( a good lengthy telephone
conversation I might add)

he knows my position.

Did I get chatty on you? Remember, you initiated the call;)

So, who is in?
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
After talking with Scott this afternoon ( a good lengthy telephone
conversation I might add)

he knows my position.


I hope the call was on his nickel!

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 10:09*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

After talking with Scott this afternoon ( a good lengthy telephone
conversation I might add)

he knows my position.

I hope the call was on his nickel!

No, it was my company dime.

LOL!

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 10:09*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

After talking with Scott this afternoon ( a good lengthy telephone
conversation I might add)

he knows my position.

I hope the call was on his nickel!

Actually, more like a quarter!

? ; ^ Q

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 11:11*pm, Tim wrote:
On Sep 8, 10:09*pm, "Don White" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

....

After talking with Scott this afternoon ( a good lengthy telephone
conversation I might add)

he knows my position.

I hope the call was on his nickel!

No, it was my company dime.

LOL!

Dude, next time I will call you back, my plan has free calling within
the US and I have like 6000 rollover minutes to spare...;) Never
really thought about it, next time remind me, no reason to spend $$,
when I have the golden plan;)

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 8, 10:15*pm, wrote:
On Sep 8, 11:11*pm, Tim wrote:



On Sep 8, 10:09*pm, "Don White" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

....

After talking with Scott this afternoon ( a good lengthy telephone
conversation I might add)

he knows my position.

I hope the call was on his nickel!

No, it was my company dime.

LOL!

Dude, next time I will call you back, my plan has free calling within
the US and I have like 6000 rollover minutes to spare...;) Never
really thought about it, next time remind me, no reason to spend $$,
when I have the golden plan;)

yeah, but I have unlimited calling (contenential, US Canada) for
$74.00 a mo, and a tax write off!

So, who is in?
 

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 10:35*pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:

Are you in?

I'm in, with the exception that when my plaintiff action is served
upon WAFA, I'll post a link here with no editorial comment.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The idea is not to address them, mention, them, answer them, period..
in or out.. So if you think you are really in, glad to add you to the
list, posts such as the one you just made are not really in, but
hopefully you took you final shot.... I think JohnH fell out already
with a post to Donnie, earlier.. too bad..

Hey, come on now. Your idea said "Harry and Salty". I should have
automatically included the other two, but I didn't. From now on I will.

May apologies to all.

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 9, 6:32*am, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 10:35*pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:

Are you in?

I'm in, with the exception that when my plaintiff action is served
upon WAFA, I'll post a link here with no editorial comment.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The idea is not to address them, mention, them, answer them, period..
in or out.. *So if you think you are really in, glad to add you to the
list, posts such as the one you just made are not really in, but
hopefully you took you final shot.... I think JohnH fell out already
with a post to Donnie, earlier.. too bad..

Hey, come on now. Your idea said "Harry and Salty". I should have
automatically included the other two, but I didn't. From now on I will.

May apologies to all.

S'ok, It wasn't the recipeint of your post, it was the content... but
you are forgiven;) Sounds like things are straightening out here
already...

OT - So, who is in?
 

OT- So, who is in?
 

So, who is in?
 

So, who is in?
 

On Sep 9, 8:47*am, TJ wrote:
wrote:
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. * 09/08/08 *09:19

Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Now there's an idea whose time has come. I resubscribed to ask a
question about rebuilding procedures for 2-cycle engines, and I see a
movement is afoot. I also see that since that movement started, the
offending subject matter has practically disappeared, at least as far as
new threads are concerned. I don't know how long it will last, but I
applaud the effort.

I, for one, don't see the harm in civilized debate. In fact, I believe
it to be beneficial. Good ideas can come from almost any source, but
they need to be examined carefully in the light of day to be sure they
actually ARE good ideas. It is when the debate becomes uncivilized that
the problems begin. The offending parties mentioned in the OP, and a few
others, have decided that "winning" is more important than being
civilized, and so they lose. No, that's not quite right. We all lose
when that happens.

I got sucked in before, but it won't happen again. I'm in, and not just
for a week. I'm in for the foreseeable future. As soon as I post this
reply I'll filter out the posters in question. I probably won't be here
all the time, because I don't have occasion to go boating nearly as much
as I'd like, but I'll be back from time to time. When I check in,
anybody who has posted something that I deem uncivilized will join the
the rest in my killfile. The subject matter of the offending post is
unimportant. The tone of the post is.

Fair enough?

TJ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fair enough. Glad to have you back;) We will add your name to the list!

So, who is in?
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 10:35 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:

Are you in?

I'm in, with the exception that when my plaintiff action is served
upon WAFA, I'll post a link here with no editorial comment.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

The idea is not to address them, mention, them, answer them, period..
in or out.. So if you think you are really in, glad to add you to the
list, posts such as the one you just made are not really in, but
hopefully you took you final shot.... I think JohnH fell out already
with a post to Donnie, earlier.. too bad..

Hey, come on now. Your idea said "Harry and Salty". I should have
automatically included the other two, but I didn't. From now on I will.

May apologies to all.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't let it happen again.
We expect you to show a good example to the enlisted men.
Officers...pfffffff!

So, who is in?
 

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:32:05 -0400, John H wrote:

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 10:35 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:

Are you in?

I'm in, with the exception that when my plaintiff action is served
upon WAFA, I'll post a link here with no editorial comment.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The idea is not to address them, mention, them, answer them, period..
in or out.. So if you think you are really in, glad to add you to the
list, posts such as the one you just made are not really in, but
hopefully you took you final shot.... I think JohnH fell out already
with a post to Donnie, earlier.. too bad..

Hey, come on now. Your idea said "Harry and Salty". I should have
automatically included the other two, but I didn't. From now on I will.

May apologies to all.

Another post mentioning the unmentionables! You guys are HOPELESSLY
OBSESSED. You can't simply shut your pie holes. You HAVE to keep
mentioning the unmentionable over and over, in posts vowing not to
mention them.


I'm thinking of dumping half my cable tv channels.
This place is more entertaining than any situation comedy on the boob tube.

OT- So, who is in?
 

TJ wrote:
wrote:
Wafa and Salty have nothing to add here but hate and bull****...

During the big Chuckie event, those of us that were left decided not
to answer "any" of Harry's trolls, boating or otherwise. It worked
great, one day I posted a link showing some 50 unanswered trolls by
wafa in just a few hours. The group was doing fine until two very
prominent figures came back and decided they could reach out and
select certain posts to answer, but it soon fell apart.. Now that both
have realized the futile nature of the task, one has left and the
other is finally on board...

I suggest we see if we can get back to letting Harry and Salty talk to
themselves, I will be totally ignoring both Harry and Salty for one
week from today. If others join in, we might have a chance. Even folks
like you Tim, should give it a try, if only for a week. If it doesn't
work, go on back to picking and choosing your posts to him, but give
it a try for a week and see what happens..

Who else will put their name on the list of us who are "in" for one
week. I will start... Sign up below.

I pledge not to engage Harry or Salty (could be the same person) for
one week starting today. I will not mention them in any post, I will
not mention them in any way, insulting or otherwise.

Here is the list of those who really want to save the group:
JustWaitaFrekinMinute.. 09/08/08 09:19



Hopefully, we can put a stop to this crap, once and for all now that
we are all here. So comeon folks, after over a decade of filth, let's
try a week withougt it.

Are you in?

Now there's an idea whose time has come. I resubscribed to ask a
question about rebuilding procedures for 2-cycle engines, and I see a
movement is afoot. I also see that since that movement started, the
offending subject matter has practically disappeared, at least as far as
new threads are concerned. I don't know how long it will last, but I
applaud the effort.

I, for one, don't see the harm in civilized debate. In fact, I believe
it to be beneficial. Good ideas can come from almost any source, but
they need to be examined carefully in the light of day to be sure they
actually ARE good ideas. It is when the debate becomes uncivilized that
the problems begin. The offending parties mentioned in the OP, and a few
others, have decided that "winning" is more important than being
civilized, and so they lose. No, that's not quite right. We all lose
when that happens.

I got sucked in before, but it won't happen again. I'm in, and not just
for a week. I'm in for the foreseeable future. As soon as I post this
reply I'll filter out the posters in question. I probably won't be here
all the time, because I don't have occasion to go boating nearly as much
as I'd like, but I'll be back from time to time. When I check in,
anybody who has posted something that I deem uncivilized will join the
the rest in my killfile. The subject matter of the offending post is
unimportant. The tone of the post is.

Fair enough?

TJ

Subject header modified to indicate this post is off-topic.

OT- So, who is in?
 

So, who is in?
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 8, 10:35 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:

Are you in?

I'm in, with the exception that when my plaintiff action is served
upon WAFA, I'll post a link here with no editorial comment.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The idea is not to address them, mention, them, answer them, period..
in or out.. So if you think you are really in, glad to add you to the
list, posts such as the one you just made are not really in, but
hopefully you took you final shot.... I think JohnH fell out already
with a post to Donnie, earlier.. too bad..

Hey, come on now. Your idea said "Harry and Salty". I should have
automatically included the other two, but I didn't. From now on I will.

May apologies to all.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't let it happen again.
We expect you to show a good example to the enlisted men.
Officers...pfffffff!

On second thought...this situation is troubling.
Up here, if the privates take over and start issuing orders to the Lt.
Colonels (and other officers), we call it mutiny
John, you have to get control of this situation before the disease spreads.
No one will be safe!