Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 04:31:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Sep 5, 6:25*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's *Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him
interview Michael Moore tonight!

In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.

John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry.

nah, I try to get along with everybody.

Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. *Harry has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.

Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

He sure as hell needs no further encouragement.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I don't think the 'majority of everyone else here' really enjoys Harry's
'stir'.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.

You are sounding very much like Eisboch was sounding until his continuous
'discussions' with Harry turned into another name-calling contest. Hell,
Harry now has Eisboch sharing *my* pedestal. Surely you don't want that for
yourself!

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him
interview Michael Moore tonight!
In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.
John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry.
nah, I try to get along with everybody.
Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.

Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.


Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political
opinions that differ from theirs.

BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war?

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O',
sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious
interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by
big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by
the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said,
and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it
seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't
think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same
fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and
Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard
interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux,
where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you
he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you
with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with
Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or
at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and
not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he
does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him
interview Michael Moore tonight!
In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You
don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.
John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry.
nah, I try to get along with everybody.
Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.

Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.


Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political
opinions that differ from theirs.

BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war?


Huh? What's *your* toleration level?

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O',
sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious
interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by
big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by
the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said,
and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it
seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't
think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same
fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and
Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard
interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux,
where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you
he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you
with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with
Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or
at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and
not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he
does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him
interview Michael Moore tonight!
In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You
don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.
John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry.
nah, I try to get along with everybody.
Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.
Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.

Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political
opinions that differ from theirs.

BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war?


Huh? What's *your* toleration level?


It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political
opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is
still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of
speech.

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

"hk" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O',
sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious
interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with
BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing
by big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled"
by the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has
said, and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but
it seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't
think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same
fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and
Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard
interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux,
where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you
he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you
with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with
Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with
that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program,
or at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy
him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera,
and not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he
does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch
him
interview Michael Moore tonight!
In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You
don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.
John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry.
nah, I try to get along with everybody.
Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him
to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry
has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted
the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.
Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.

Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political
opinions that differ from theirs.

BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war?


Huh? What's *your* toleration level?
It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political
opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still
the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of speech.

That really doesn't answer the question.

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O',
sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious
interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with
BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing
by big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled"
by the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has
said, and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but
it seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't
think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same
fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and
Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard
interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux,
where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you
he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you
with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with
Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with
that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program,
or at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy
him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera,
and not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he
does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch
him
interview Michael Moore tonight!
In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You
don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.
John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry.
nah, I try to get along with everybody.
Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him
to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry
has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted
the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.
Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.
Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political
opinions that differ from theirs.

BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war?

Huh? What's *your* toleration level?
It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political
opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still
the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of speech.

That really doesn't answer the question.



You need to qualify or flesh out your questions, Quacky. They're too
ambiguous.

My toleration level for what?

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

"hk" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill
O', sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious
interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with
BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for
interviewing by big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled"
by the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has
said, and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but
it seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't
think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same
fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has
been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and
Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard
interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on
Faux, where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox
but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you
he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you
with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the
first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table
with Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that
he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with
that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio
program, or at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy
him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera,
and not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what
he does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch
him
interview Michael Moore tonight!
In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You
don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.
John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than
Harry.
nah, I try to get along with everybody.
Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him
to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry
has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted
the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.
Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.
Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate
political opinions that differ from theirs.

BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war?

Huh? What's *your* toleration level?
It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political
opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is
still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of
speech.

That really doesn't answer the question.

You need to qualify or flesh out your questions, Quacky. They're too
ambiguous.

My toleration level for what?

....."righties simply cannot *tolerate* political
opinions that differ from theirs".

What is your (lefty) ability to *tolerate* political opinions that differ
from yours (theirs)?

From what I read, not much.

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill
O', sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious
interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with
BillOrally.
Why not? Barak was just on there...
Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for
interviewing by big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled"
by the
McCain campaign.
There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has
said, and
major flip-flops... :)
Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but
it seems
like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't
think
that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same
fashion.
Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has
been
smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and
Sarah
for the last 3 days ( or so).
If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard
interviews
just yet.
and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing.
If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news
interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on
Faux, where
they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great
interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality.
Larry would be a great interview.
Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox
but
believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you
he'll
let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you
with
three different questions while you're trying to answer the
first
one... and criticize you in between.
And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not
pleasant.
but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table
with Allen
Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that
he's
nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with
that
notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio
program, or at
least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy
him.
I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera,
and not
on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what
he does
well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions.
Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either.
Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough.
If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch
him
interview Michael Moore tonight!
In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You
don't
want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect.
John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than
Harry.
nah, I try to get along with everybody.
Tim,
The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him
to
post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry
has
stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted
the
RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game.
Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says.

Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else
here.

I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize.
Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate
political opinions that differ from theirs.

BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war?
Huh? What's *your* toleration level?
It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political
opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is
still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of
speech.
That really doesn't answer the question.
You need to qualify or flesh out your questions, Quacky. They're too
ambiguous.

My toleration level for what?

...."righties simply cannot *tolerate* political
opinions that differ from theirs".

What is your (lefty) ability to *tolerate* political opinions that differ
from yours (theirs)?

From what I read, not much.




Really? I don't give a damn what the hard righties here posit as "thought."

BTW, have you heard about McCain's time as a POW? What an impressive job
he'll do as president, eh?

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

snip

BTW, have you heard about McCain's time as a POW? What an impressive job
he'll do as president, eh?


For better or worse, maybe we'll find out.

Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
 

hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down
interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure...
Have fun, be informed, watch...
Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by
serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally.

Why not? Barak was just on there...

Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big
time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the
McCain campaign.

There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and
major flip-flops... :)

Like Chris Matthews who gets a tingle up his leg every time he thinks
about Obama?