Admission ...
 

I am more than pleased to admit I was absolutely dead wrong about McCain
choice in Palin as VP.
What a refreshing new political face.

Let the bashing from the left begin ... it doesn't matter.

"Delicious!"


And 'ol Rudy wasn't too bad either!


Eisboch

Admission ...
 

Eisboch wrote:
I am more than pleased to admit I was absolutely dead wrong about McCain
choice in Palin as VP.
What a refreshing new political face.

Let the bashing from the left begin ... it doesn't matter.

"Delicious!"


And 'ol Rudy wasn't too bad either!


Eisboch



snerk

Yeah, she's a gem, all right. Mother of the year.

Rudy was...Rudy.

Admission ...
 

Eisboch wrote:
I am more than pleased to admit I was absolutely dead wrong about McCain
choice in Palin as VP.
What a refreshing new political face.

Let the bashing from the left begin ... it doesn't matter.

"Delicious!"


And 'ol Rudy wasn't too bad either!


Eisboch


I was sort of leaning toward Obama just because Hillary was his
opponent. I would have settled for Obama or McCain. Now McCain's
campaign has gotten that needed transfusion. We have new hope for
POSITIVE change. Obama's history Is beginning to scare me.
Hallelujah for Sarah. The speaches last night were awesome.

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:43:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I am more than pleased to admit I was absolutely dead wrong about McCain
choice in Palin as VP.
What a refreshing new political face.

Let the bashing from the left begin ... it doesn't matter.

"Delicious!"


And 'ol Rudy wasn't too bad either!


You were taking the talking heads too seriously.
This is why I asked if Scarborough was assimilated a couple days ago.
He was spouting the same Dem talking points about "McCains's
judgement" as the Obama operatives.
Even yesterday up until Palin got a chance to talk, he couldn't stop
asking every guest, repeatedly and with great relish, "How many
interviews did you have with the chief-of-staff you hired?"
Today he hasn't opened his trap once about McCain's "lack of
judgement" even while flapping his jaws and running over other people
as is his fashion.
In his ideological conservative heart, Joe despises McCain. Jealously
probably.
He's dropped quite a bit in my estimation, since he's proved he's
caught up in his ego and the bubble of "good-old-buddy" pundits
surrounding him.
Once again Pat Buchanan is the only one who kept his head.
Classy.
He and Brokaw are the only sensible people on MSNBC.
Palin may get Hillary votes, and has certainly energized the
Republican base. But she has a way to go, and may be tripped up
on policy. Economics should carry the day for the Dems, but now
all the Reps need is a terrorist attack and they're in like Flynn.
The Dem voters made a big mistake in nominating an intellectual Yuppie
who didn't have the balls to put Hillary on the ticket. Hillary would
more easily neutralize Palin. Biden is just another Washington
insider.
American voters will often vote against their own economic interests
for other values.
Okay, enough bull**** from me. Hope I didn't offend anyone.

--Vic

Admission ...
 

Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:43:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I am more than pleased to admit I was absolutely dead wrong about McCain
choice in Palin as VP.
What a refreshing new political face.

Let the bashing from the left begin ... it doesn't matter.

"Delicious!"


And 'ol Rudy wasn't too bad either!


You were taking the talking heads too seriously.
This is why I asked if Scarborough was assimilated a couple days ago.
He was spouting the same Dem talking points about "McCains's
judgement" as the Obama operatives.
Even yesterday up until Palin got a chance to talk, he couldn't stop
asking every guest, repeatedly and with great relish, "How many
interviews did you have with the chief-of-staff you hired?"
Today he hasn't opened his trap once about McCain's "lack of
judgement" even while flapping his jaws and running over other people
as is his fashion.
In his ideological conservative heart, Joe despises McCain. Jealously
probably.
He's dropped quite a bit in my estimation, since he's proved heswi

caught up in his ego and the bubble of "good-old-buddy" pundits
surrounding him.
Once again Pat Buchanan is the only one who kept his head.
Classy.
He and Brokaw are the only sensible people on MSNBC.
Palin may get Hillary votes, and has certainly energized the
Republican base. But she has a way to go, and may be tripped up
on policy. Economics should carry the day for the Dems, but now
all the Reps need is a terrorist attack and they're in like Flynn.
The Dem voters made a big mistake in nominating an intellectual Yuppie
who didn't have the balls to put Hillary on the ticket. Hillary would
more easily neutralize Palin. Biden is just another Washington
insider.
American voters will often vote against their own economic interests
for other values.
Okay, enough bull**** from me. Hope I didn't offend anyone.

--Vic


An anti-choice, anti-book, anti-intellectual female Spiro Agnew is not
going to get the Hillary votes, but I won't dispute that she was the
perfect person to rev up the GOP base, because she is as base as it is.

Amazing...the GOPs pick a completely irresponsible "hockey mom" for
their ticket, a woman who makes her motherhood an issue, yet isn't swift
enough to know that "abstinence education" leads to early pregnancies,
and is now forcing her teeny-bopper daughter into a shotgun marriage to
a boy who seems to have all the maturity and intellectuality of a
mooseburger.

Ms. Palin did a great job delivering the speech that was written for
her. Unless she sticks to the really small media markets where the
third-rate reporters learn the biz, she's going to be eaten alive on
policy issue questions at news conferences. I've not heard a hint from
this woman that she knows anything about anything.

Admission ...
 

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:43:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I am more than pleased to admit I was absolutely dead wrong about McCain
choice in Palin as VP.
What a refreshing new political face.

Let the bashing from the left begin ... it doesn't matter.

"Delicious!"


And 'ol Rudy wasn't too bad either!


You were taking the talking heads too seriously.
This is why I asked if Scarborough was assimilated a couple days ago.
He was spouting the same Dem talking points about "McCains's
judgement" as the Obama operatives.
Even yesterday up until Palin got a chance to talk, he couldn't stop
asking every guest, repeatedly and with great relish, "How many
interviews did you have with the chief-of-staff you hired?"
Today he hasn't opened his trap once about McCain's "lack of
judgement" even while flapping his jaws and running over other people
as is his fashion.
In his ideological conservative heart, Joe despises McCain. Jealously
probably.
He's dropped quite a bit in my estimation, since he's proved he's
caught up in his ego and the bubble of "good-old-buddy" pundits
surrounding him.
Once again Pat Buchanan is the only one who kept his head.
Classy.
He and Brokaw are the only sensible people on MSNBC.
Palin may get Hillary votes, and has certainly energized the
Republican base. But she has a way to go, and may be tripped up
on policy. Economics should carry the day for the Dems, but now
all the Reps need is a terrorist attack and they're in like Flynn.
The Dem voters made a big mistake in nominating an intellectual Yuppie
who didn't have the balls to put Hillary on the ticket. Hillary would
more easily neutralize Palin. Biden is just another Washington
insider.
American voters will often vote against their own economic interests
for other values.
Okay, enough bull**** from me. Hope I didn't offend anyone.

--Vic

Certainly not me. I also agree with your 100% regarding Brokaw and
Buchanan, although it was fun to see Buchanan absolutely delight in response
to the speeches. I love listening to politicians who have a sense of
humor. Rudy and Buchanan certainly don't disappoint.

BTW ..... I think we all have to accept the fact that the excitement of the
election, particularly this one because it's guarantied to be historic, is
naturally going to be a source for many OT posts here and in virtually every
other non moderated newsgroup.

Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch

Admission ...
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..


An anti-choice, anti-book, anti-intellectual female Spiro Agnew is not
going to get the Hillary votes, but I won't dispute that she was the
perfect person to rev up the GOP base, because she is as base as it is.

Amazing...the GOPs pick a completely irresponsible "hockey mom" for their
ticket, a woman who makes her motherhood an issue, yet isn't swift enough
to know that "abstinence education" leads to early pregnancies, and is now
forcing her teeny-bopper daughter into a shotgun marriage to a boy who
seems to have all the maturity and intellectuality of a mooseburger.

Ms. Palin did a great job delivering the speech that was written for her.
Unless she sticks to the really small media markets where the third-rate
reporters learn the biz, she's going to be eaten alive on policy issue
questions at news conferences. I've not heard a hint from this woman that
she knows anything about anything.


This will be a rare direct response to you Harry.
If you don't get it by now, I'll spell it out for you.

N- o- b-o-d-y c-a-r-e-s w-h-a-t y-o-u t-h-i-n-k a-n-y-m-o-r-e.

No. "think" is the wrong word. "Cut and paste", "copy", "repeat"
"regurgitate", or something like that is better.

Any credibility you may have had recently went out the window.


Eisboch

Admission ...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

An anti-choice, anti-book, anti-intellectual female Spiro Agnew is not
going to get the Hillary votes, but I won't dispute that she was the
perfect person to rev up the GOP base, because she is as base as it is.

Amazing...the GOPs pick a completely irresponsible "hockey mom" for their
ticket, a woman who makes her motherhood an issue, yet isn't swift enough
to know that "abstinence education" leads to early pregnancies, and is now
forcing her teeny-bopper daughter into a shotgun marriage to a boy who
seems to have all the maturity and intellectuality of a mooseburger.

Ms. Palin did a great job delivering the speech that was written for her.
Unless she sticks to the really small media markets where the third-rate
reporters learn the biz, she's going to be eaten alive on policy issue
questions at news conferences. I've not heard a hint from this woman that
she knows anything about anything.


This will be a rare direct response to you Harry.
If you don't get it by now, I'll spell it out for you.

N- o- b-o-d-y c-a-r-e-s w-h-a-t y-o-u t-h-i-n-k a-n-y-m-o-r-e.

No. "think" is the wrong word. "Cut and paste", "copy", "repeat"
"regurgitate", or something like that is better.

Any credibility you may have had recently went out the window.


Eisboch




Awwwwwwwwwww.

This one's for you:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../sarahpool.jpg

Admission ...
 

wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:26:19 -0400, hk wrote:

This one's for you:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../sarahpool.jpg


Actually not bad for 44 years old with 5 kids.

I am happy to see young people around the White House.

Obama/Palin for 08!!

Screw experience.
As Obama said, you couldn't find two more experienced guys than
Rumsfeld and Cheney. Look at the cluster **** they got us into


Experience is not relevant; judgment is.

Lincoln led this country through its most horrific years, and preserved
the Union. He had been a U.S. Representative and an Illinois state
legislator.

Nixon was a U.S. Representative and then a U.S. Senator before he became
president. Flawed to be sure, but he had judgment.

FDR knew what he was doing before he became governor of New York.

Bush had two terms as governor of Texas, and plenty of "executive
experience," but no judgment.

Harry Truman had been a haberdasher and a county judge before going to
the US Senate. He had little experience, but plenty of judgment.

Admission ...
 

So'k Dick, we can get back to boats, geetars, and other good stuff now
that you have returned from the dark side;)


On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:23:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



This will be a rare direct response to you Harry.
If you don't get it by now, I'll spell it out for you.

N- o- b-o-d-y c-a-r-e-s w-h-a-t y-o-u t-h-i-n-k a-n-y-m-o-r-e.

No. "think" is the wrong word. "Cut and paste", "copy", "repeat"
"regurgitate", or something like that is better.

Any credibility you may have had recently went out the window.


Eisboch

Admission ...
 

On Sep 4, 1:23*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message

. ..







An anti-choice, anti-book, anti-intellectual female Spiro Agnew is not
going to get the Hillary votes, but I won't dispute that she was the
perfect person to rev up the GOP base, because she is as base as it is.

Amazing...the GOPs pick a completely irresponsible "hockey mom" for their
ticket, a woman who makes her motherhood an issue, yet isn't swift enough
to know that "abstinence education" leads to early pregnancies, and is now
forcing her teeny-bopper daughter into a shotgun marriage to a boy who
seems to have all the maturity and intellectuality of a mooseburger.

Ms. Palin did a great job delivering the speech that was written for her.

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:38:12 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:26:19 -0400, hk wrote:

This one's for you:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../sarahpool.jpg


Actually not bad for 44 years old with 5 kids.


....And someone else's body grafted on in Photoshop. That photo was a
contest submission for altered photos of Palin.




I am happy to see young people around the White House.

Obama/Palin for 08!!

Screw experience.
As Obama said, you couldn't find two more experienced guys than
Rumsfeld and Cheney. Look at the cluster **** they got us into

Admission ...
 

wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:38:12 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:26:19 -0400, hk wrote:

This one's for you:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../sarahpool.jpg

Actually not bad for 44 years old with 5 kids.


...And someone else's body grafted on in Photoshop. That photo was a
contest submission for altered photos of Palin.



No one really believes that was Palin???

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:21:06 -0400, hk wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:38:12 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:26:19 -0400, hk wrote:

This one's for you:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../sarahpool.jpg

Actually not bad for 44 years old with 5 kids.


...And someone else's body grafted on in Photoshop. That photo was a
contest submission for altered photos of Palin.



No one really believes that was Palin???

It wasn't. It was exactly what I just said it was. There are all sorts
of online photoshop contests conducted by various websites. That was a
submission to one of them.

Admission ...
 

snip
Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch

Looong after election day. 8)

I can just see the sour grapes after the election if McCain/Palin are
victorious. It won't be pretty.

Admission ...
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:26:19 -0400, hk wrote:

This one's for you:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../sarahpool.jpg


Actually not bad for 44 years old with 5 kids.

I am happy to see young people around the White House.

Obama/Palin for 08!!

Screw experience.
As Obama said, you couldn't find two more experienced guys than
Rumsfeld and Cheney. Look at the cluster **** they got us into


Experience is not relevant; judgment is.

Lincoln led this country through its most horrific years, and preserved
the Union. He had been a U.S. Representative and an Illinois state
legislator.

Nixon was a U.S. Representative and then a U.S. Senator before he became
president. Flawed to be sure, but he had judgment.

FDR knew what he was doing before he became governor of New York.

Bush had two terms as governor of Texas, and plenty of "executive
experience," but no judgment.

Harry Truman had been a haberdasher and a county judge before going to the
US Senate. He had little experience, but plenty of judgment.



Your distortion extends to ignoring eight years as vice president by Tricky
Dick.

Is Osamabama going to save us all?

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:14:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:43:12 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

I am more than pleased to admit I was absolutely dead wrong about McCain
choice in Palin as VP.
What a refreshing new political face.

Let the bashing from the left begin ... it doesn't matter.

"Delicious!"


And 'ol Rudy wasn't too bad either!


You were taking the talking heads too seriously.
This is why I asked if Scarborough was assimilated a couple days ago.
He was spouting the same Dem talking points about "McCains's
judgement" as the Obama operatives.
Even yesterday up until Palin got a chance to talk, he couldn't stop
asking every guest, repeatedly and with great relish, "How many
interviews did you have with the chief-of-staff you hired?"
Today he hasn't opened his trap once about McCain's "lack of
judgement" even while flapping his jaws and running over other people
as is his fashion.
In his ideological conservative heart, Joe despises McCain. Jealously
probably.
He's dropped quite a bit in my estimation, since he's proved he's
caught up in his ego and the bubble of "good-old-buddy" pundits
surrounding him.
Once again Pat Buchanan is the only one who kept his head.
Classy.
He and Brokaw are the only sensible people on MSNBC.
Palin may get Hillary votes, and has certainly energized the
Republican base. But she has a way to go, and may be tripped up
on policy. Economics should carry the day for the Dems, but now
all the Reps need is a terrorist attack and they're in like Flynn.
The Dem voters made a big mistake in nominating an intellectual Yuppie
who didn't have the balls to put Hillary on the ticket. Hillary would
more easily neutralize Palin. Biden is just another Washington
insider.
American voters will often vote against their own economic interests
for other values.
Okay, enough bull**** from me. Hope I didn't offend anyone.

--Vic

Certainly not me. I also agree with your 100% regarding Brokaw and
Buchanan, although it was fun to see Buchanan absolutely delight in response
to the speeches. I love listening to politicians who have a sense of
humor. Rudy and Buchanan certainly don't disappoint.

BTW ..... I think we all have to accept the fact that the excitement of the
election, particularly this one because it's guarantied to be historic, is
naturally going to be a source for many OT posts here and in virtually every
other non moderated newsgroup.

Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch


Do you really believe Harry's attitude is due to the 'uniqueness' of this
election? When you get right down to it, there is no change - election or
no election. I was surprised you said nothing to him when he began calling
Tom, with whom I assume you are somewhat friendly, names.

Thank you for seeing the light. It has greatly reduced the number of 'hk'
posts already.

Admission ...
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
snip
Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling
after election day.

Eisboch

Looong after election day. 8)

I can just see the sour grapes after the election if McCain/Palin are
victorious. It won't be pretty.


A certain person has made noises about moving to Costa Rica or Norway or
something if things don't go his way.

Hopefully it will be someplace that lacks Internet service.

Eisboch

Admission ...
 

"Lu Powell" wrote in message
. ..



Is Osamabama going to save us all?



I loved Rudy's line last night ...... "Change is not a direction and Hope is
not a strategy."

Eisboch

Admission ...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
snip
Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling
after election day.

Eisboch
Looong after election day. 8)

I can just see the sour grapes after the election if McCain/Palin are
victorious. It won't be pretty.


A certain person has made noises about moving to Costa Rica or Norway or
something if things don't go his way.

Hopefully it will be someplace that lacks Internet service.

Eisboch




Aswwwwww....how...petulant.

Note, Richard, that while you are now acting nasty towards me, I am not
returning the compliment.

Have fun! And I do hope President Obama raises your tax burden
substantially. :)

Admission ...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:14:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch


Do you really believe Harry's attitude is due to the 'uniqueness' of this
election? When you get right down to it, there is no change - election or
no election. I was surprised you said nothing to him when he began calling
Tom, with whom I assume you are somewhat friendly, names.


Tom doesn't need any help in defending himself.

Eisboch

Admission ...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:14:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch

Do you really believe Harry's attitude is due to the 'uniqueness' of this
election? When you get right down to it, there is no change - election or
no election. I was surprised you said nothing to him when he began calling
Tom, with whom I assume you are somewhat friendly, names.


Tom doesn't need any help in defending himself.

Eisboch




Heheheh...Herring stirs the pot, and you ladle out a spoonful and
swallow it.

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:38:38 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:14:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch


Do you really believe Harry's attitude is due to the 'uniqueness' of this
election? When you get right down to it, there is no change - election or
no election. I was surprised you said nothing to him when he began calling
Tom, with whom I assume you are somewhat friendly, names.


Tom doesn't need any help in defending himself.

Eisboch


Tom didn't need defending at all.

Harry needed to be reprimanded by someone he 'respected'.

Admission ...
 

"hk" wrote in message
...



Aswwwwww....how...petulant.

Note, Richard, that while you are now acting nasty towards me, I am not
returning the compliment.

Have fun! And I do hope President Obama raises your tax burden
substantially. :)



There are few people in this world that I act "nasty" to, although I am not
even close to nastiness.
You have recently earned the right to be included in the few.

I have no use for people with your level of intolerance and vile,
self-serving attitudes.

Eisboch

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:33:38 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...
snip
Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling
after election day.

Eisboch

Looong after election day. 8)

I can just see the sour grapes after the election if McCain/Palin are
victorious. It won't be pretty.

A certain person has made noises about moving to Costa Rica or Norway or
something if things don't go his way.

Hopefully it will be someplace that lacks Internet service.

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Smooth - that was very smooth. :)

Admission ...
 

On Sep 4, 4:13*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
snip

Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch

Looong after election day. 8)

I can just see the sour grapes after the election if McCain/Palin are
victorious. *It won't be pretty.

I would glady suffer 100 Harrys, as long as his new racist hater does
not get into the whitehouse..

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:59:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 4, 4:13*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
snip

Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch

Looong after election day. 8)

I can just see the sour grapes after the election if McCain/Palin are
victorious. *It won't be pretty.

I would glady suffer 100 Harrys, as long as his new racist hater does
not get into the whitehouse..

At least Harry's easy to filter!

Admission ...
 

On Sep 4, 12:26*pm, hk wrote:

Awwwwwwwwwww.

This one's for you:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/sarahpoo...

looks good to me!

Admission ...
 

On Sep 4, 2:13*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:38:12 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:26:19 -0400, hk wrote:

This one's for you:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/sarahpoo....

Actually not bad for 44 years old with 5 kids.

...And someone else's body grafted on in Photoshop. That photo was a
contest submission for altered photos of Palin.


Still, looks good to me

Admission ...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...


Aswwwwww....how...petulant.

Note, Richard, that while you are now acting nasty towards me, I am not
returning the compliment.

Have fun! And I do hope President Obama raises your tax burden
substantially. :)



There are few people in this world that I act "nasty" to, although I am not
even close to nastiness.
You have recently earned the right to be included in the few.

I have no use for people with your level of intolerance and vile,
self-serving attitudes.

Eisboch



We "intolerant" folks are sick of the past eight years of the
destruction of this country by your boy Bush.

Admission ...
 

John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:38:38 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:14:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult hurling after
election day.

Eisboch

Do you really believe Harry's attitude is due to the 'uniqueness' of this
election? When you get right down to it, there is no change - election or
no election. I was surprised you said nothing to him when he began calling
Tom, with whom I assume you are somewhat friendly, names.

Tom doesn't need any help in defending himself.

Eisboch


Tom didn't need defending at all.

Harry needed to be reprimanded by someone he 'respected'.


You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to me.

Admission ...
 

hk wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:38:38 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:14:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Things will get back to the "normal" mud-slinging and insult
hurling after
election day.

Eisboch

Do you really believe Harry's attitude is due to the 'uniqueness' of
this
election? When you get right down to it, there is no change -
election or
no election. I was surprised you said nothing to him when he began
calling
Tom, with whom I assume you are somewhat friendly, names.

Tom doesn't need any help in defending himself.

Eisboch

Tom didn't need defending at all.

Harry needed to be reprimanded by someone he 'respected'.


You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to me.

I thought Eisboch and SWS were righteous righties? What happened?

Admission ...
 

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:43:09 -0400, hk wrote:

You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to me.

That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.

Admission ...
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:43:09 -0400, hk wrote:

You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to me.

That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.


Seriously, what scares me, is this guy owns a gun.

Admission ...
 

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:18:21 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC,
STP. " wrote:

That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.


Seriously, what scares me, is this guy owns a gun.

Maybe.

Even if so, he only shoots tree stumps which have threatened him
first.

Admission ...
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:43:09 -0400, hk wrote:

You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to me.

That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.

Wayne, Harry must be heartbroken. He has lost his last advocate on this
newsgroup unless you want to count Halifax Don. Even Ohio Jim seems to
have left the nest. Harry is ALONE - UNWANTED - REJECTED - SCORNED- and
DISMISSED AS A RAVING LUNATIC. He has hit bottom. He might just as well
go out in the woods and have a nice long talk with stumpy and then
end it all.

Admission ...
 

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:43:09 -0400, hk wrote:

You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to
me.

That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.


Seriously, what scares me, is this guy owns a gun.

There should be a law that the mentally Ill be prohibited from owning
any type of firearm.

Admission ...
 

jim wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:43:09 -0400, hk wrote:

You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of
the nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters
not to me.

That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.


Seriously, what scares me, is this guy owns a gun.

There should be a law that the mentally Ill be prohibited from owning
any type of firearm.

There is. He slipped under the radar.

Admission ...
 

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:29:23 -0400, jim wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:43:09 -0400, hk wrote:

You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to me.

That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.

Wayne, Harry must be heartbroken. He has lost his last advocate on this
newsgroup unless you want to count Halifax Don. Even Ohio Jim seems to
have left the nest. Harry is ALONE - UNWANTED - REJECTED - SCORNED- and
DISMISSED AS A RAVING LUNATIC. He has hit bottom. He might just as well
go out in the woods and have a nice long talk with stumpy and then
end it all.

Look carefully. It looks as though Harry is dragging in another with whom
he can debate under the auspices of 'mutual respect'. We'll see how long
that lasts.

Admission ...
 

John H wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:29:23 -0400, jim wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:43:09 -0400, hk wrote:

You're projecting. Why would I give a rat's ass about "respect" from
someone I don't know and will never meet? I merely gave him the same
courtesy he gave me. He has unilaterally decided to became one of the
nasty ****s here, in other words, someone like you. It matters not to me.
That statement speaks volumes regarding your ongoing personality
deterioration and your need to get professional assistance with it.
Do it for your own good.

Wayne, Harry must be heartbroken. He has lost his last advocate on this
newsgroup unless you want to count Halifax Don. Even Ohio Jim seems to
have left the nest. Harry is ALONE - UNWANTED - REJECTED - SCORNED- and
DISMISSED AS A RAVING LUNATIC. He has hit bottom. He might just as well
go out in the woods and have a nice long talk with stumpy and then
end it all.

Look carefully. It looks as though Harry is dragging in another with whom
he can debate under the auspices of 'mutual respect'. We'll see how long
that lasts.


Looks like I have almost all the GOP vote locked up tight, from the
drooling idiots like Herring and Florida Jim, to the "I've got mine so
screw you" types like W'hine and Eisboch. So, Phase I is pretty much
complete.

Onto Phase II.


BTW, did you know John McShrub was a POW?