Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TJ wrote:
hk wrote: As for Palin's decision, I think it was the wrong one. It was wrong because Palin is at the age where pregnancies for women can mean serious trouble, both for the woman and the child that is born. There's a close connection between Down's syndrome and age of the mother. After 40, if memory serves, the chances of having a child with the syndrome rise to better than one in 20. Palin must have known that risk, and apparently was told she was carrying a fetus with the syndrome. She shouldn't have gotten pregnant. It was selfishness. And she should have aborted the fetus. There's not a damned thing admirable in her decisions. It was selfishness. So to you "Pro-Choice" means, "make the choice we want you to make, or we'll make it for you." Huh. Sounds a lot like 1930's Germany to me, or maybe 1940's Soviet Union under Stalin. Let Big Brother take care of you. If that's what Obama believes, I want no part of him. TJ No, being pro-choice means a woman has a choice...Palin made the wrong choice, but it was her choice to make. That's quite a bit different from not having a choice. But you righties don't seem to get that difference. |