Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
hk wrote:
Palin must have known that
risk, and apparently was told she was carrying a fetus with the syndrome.

She shouldn't have gotten pregnant. It was selfishness. And she should
have aborted the fetus.

There's not a damned thing admirable in her decisions.

It was selfishness.

DAMN! It is both a fetus and her baby, her child. Just as a toddler or
teenager is still her child, the fetus identifies the age of her child,
it does not mean it is not her child. DAMN!

I am just guessing that this pregnancy was one of those "happy surprises
and was not planned. A woman Palin's age had a 1 in 35 chance of having
Down Syndrome. Children with Down Syndrome have a large range of
disability and many work, get married and enjoy life as much as anyone.
Just because she knew her pregnancy was high risk, you think she should
have had an abortion?

I guess Tom and his wife should have aborted their "fetus" because it
had CP, which can be extremely disabling. CP can be substantially more
disabling than Down Syndrome. If that was the case, Tom and his wife
would have missed out on the joy of watching their child grow up and now
as an adult be a productive member of society who has and will continue
to have a positive influence on those he meets.

I guess you are suggestion we should test for any and all disabilities
and abort all "fetuses" that are not perfect. If that was the case, you
would definitely have been aborted.

You are really getting sicker by the day.

It has gone beyond narcissism.