hk wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:47:16 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message
...

On Aug 29, 7:24 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...

On Aug 29, 6:50 pm, hk wrote:

...and health are now issues *on* the table.
Guaranteed.
A 72-year-old man who has had four bouts with cancer...
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/05/23...ealth.records/

And?

Means absolutely nothing. He could also get hit by one of his wife's
beer
trucks the day after the inauguration.

The POTUS has a responsibility to select a qualified VP, ready to
step in
should the need arise.
McCain didn't do that. He selected someone who might make him more
electable, that's all.

I admire the achievements to date of Sarah Whateverhernameis ....
but I am
very disappointed in the reasoning of McCain in selecting her. She
simply
is not qualified.

Eisboch
And Obama is more qualified..........how?

Did you know of Obama and his experience and experience before
speculation of his campaign for POTUS started?

BTW: *She* is not at the top of the ticket.
====================================

If I may jump in, it's not that Obama is qualified, it that Ms. Palin
is not.


Huh?

The R VP delegate is more qualified for the POTUS than the D POTUS is.

Explain how I am wrong.


No need to...it is patently obvious.

I always find that game of unspoken agreement to be too funny. Two or
more idiots shaking their heads in unison and not knowing why each other
is doing it but thinking that they are now a part of the group and not
knowing what the hell is going on.