JimH wrote:
On Aug 27, 2:19 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
JimH wrote:

If anyone is going to be offended about those who served in the
military it is those who served in the military. I did not serve.
Is this the same person who got his panties in a wad because when you
were asking everyone in rec.boats to individually congratulate you and
your son for him enlisting in the marines, I thanked ALL servicemen, and
did not specifically and individually thank your son?

At the time, I was glad I didn't call anyone who enlisted in the service
a brain dead reject who could not make it in the real world and had to
suck on the public teat of the military service, as Harry has said many
times.

I guess based upon Harry's standards, your son is not qualified to dig
ditches and could not get a job to dig ditches in the real world and now
has to suck on the governmental teat.

I am glad you have gotten over whining over real and imaginary insults.

Get help.


Amazing, ain't he? Reggie the low-life coward.


--
No way, no how, no McCain!

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:00:28 -0400, hk wrote:

JimH wrote:
On Aug 27, 2:19 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
JimH wrote:

If anyone is going to be offended about those who served in the
military it is those who served in the military. I did not serve.
Is this the same person who got his panties in a wad because when you
were asking everyone in rec.boats to individually congratulate you and
your son for him enlisting in the marines, I thanked ALL servicemen, and
did not specifically and individually thank your son?

At the time, I was glad I didn't call anyone who enlisted in the service
a brain dead reject who could not make it in the real world and had to
suck on the public teat of the military service, as Harry has said many
times.

I guess based upon Harry's standards, your son is not qualified to dig
ditches and could not get a job to dig ditches in the real world and now
has to suck on the governmental teat.

I am glad you have gotten over whining over real and imaginary insults.

Get help.


Amazing, ain't he? Reggie the low-life coward.

Today you seem to have a 'coward' or 'pussy' hangup. Why is that?

Jimmie, or Donnie, can you help explain this. Both Reggie and I are being
called these names.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:00:28 -0400, hk wrote:

JimH wrote:
On Aug 27, 2:19 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
JimH wrote:

If anyone is going to be offended about those who served in the
military it is those who served in the military. I did not serve.
Is this the same person who got his panties in a wad because when you
were asking everyone in rec.boats to individually congratulate you and
your son for him enlisting in the marines, I thanked ALL servicemen,
and
did not specifically and individually thank your son?

At the time, I was glad I didn't call anyone who enlisted in the
service
a brain dead reject who could not make it in the real world and had to
suck on the public teat of the military service, as Harry has said many
times.

I guess based upon Harry's standards, your son is not qualified to dig
ditches and could not get a job to dig ditches in the real world and
now
has to suck on the governmental teat.

I am glad you have gotten over whining over real and imaginary insults.

Get help.


Amazing, ain't he? Reggie the low-life coward.

Today you seem to have a 'coward' or 'pussy' hangup. Why is that?

Jimmie, or Donnie, can you help explain this. Both Reggie and I are being
called these names.

hmmmm........... he has an astute understanding of human nature??
Ask him.