Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming?
TJ wrote:
hk wrote: TJ wrote: hk wrote: Besides, if you wanted to know when "Christ" allegedly was born, you'd have to consult a Hebrew calendar. :) Ah, the word "Christ" in quotes, in that context. Explains a lot. In fact Harry, you reveal much more by what you *don't* say than what you do. I'm curious, Harry. Are all liberals as filled with hatred for those who disagree with them as you are? If so, I don't think we should elect one. Sounds like a diplomatic disaster waiting to happen if you ask me. TJ I use "Christ" in quotes because I don't believe he was the "annointed" or "the messiah. For one thing, he did not fill all the stated criteria of Jewish tradition. Are you aware that Jewish tradition requires that the messiah be a human being, and not divine? Didn't think so. But I have many other "theological" reasons. My disbelief in Jesus as "Christ" is not based upon "hate," as you simple-minded righties seem to so easily believe. My readings of religious literature tell me that Jesus was a pretty cool dude. I am most impressed by his reported compassion for the poorest among us, an attribute *not* shared by those here who most loudly proclaim their Christianity. I have a relative, retired, who really follows the teachings of Jesus. He and his wife spend almost all their time and most of their spare money helping the hungry, the homeless, the medically needy and the lonely, and they're not preachy. I would call him a "Christian." Too many of the self-described "Christians" here are "I've got mine, so screw you" Republicans. Christianity and today's right-wing Republicanism are mutually inconsistent. I don't care whether you consider Jesus the Messiah as prophesied by Judaism or not. If you must know, I have some doubts about that myself, despite being raised as a Christian. The idea that some dude was crucified just so I could get a get-out-of-jail-free card for heaven no matter what I might have done with my life always seemed at odds with the concept of being accountable for my own actions. I've always preferred the accountability concept. I also don't care whether you are Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Shinto, or any of a thousand or so other religions - or if you have no religion at all. What difference is it supposed to make? Being the sort of person you are, of course you twisted my question into something else, something that you preferred to answer, because the question you wanted to answer made "Christians" look bad. My "hatred" question wasn't simply about religion, or any other particular specific subject. It doesn't matter what the subject is, you express hatred for all those who disagree with you. Personally, I find it practically impossible to hate anybody. Even you. But you do it so easily that I must again ask if all liberals are that way. I'm just trying to understand it, that's all. TJ You're reaching. I have no use for certain posters here, and, as I have stated, I don't much care whether they live or die. That doesn't mean I "hate" them. It only means I don't give a damn about them. You righties are always overusing the word "hate." "Hate" does not have the same meaning as "dislike," "no use for," et cetera. Oh...I don't want to make "Christians" look bad. "Christians" look bad or look good depending upon their behavior. Many of the self-professed "Christians" here give Christianity a bad name. Finally, *you* asked why I put the word "Christ" in quotation marks. That was a theological question, whether you think so or not. The word "Christ" has a specific meaning, and in the case of Jesus, I don't think it applies. But, as I stated, I think Jesus, if such a person existed, was a cool dude, and certainly more of an advocate of my positions toward my fellow man than many of the self-described "Christians" who post here. So, tell me...are you just another mindless rightie, like so many of those who post here? -- No way, no how, no McCain! |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming?
hk wrote:
TJ wrote: Ah, the word "Christ" in quotes, in that context. Explains a lot. In fact Harry, you reveal much more by what you *don't* say than what you do. Finally, *you* asked why I put the word "Christ" in quotation marks. That was a theological question, whether you think so or not. The word "Christ" has a specific meaning, and in the case of Jesus, I don't think it applies. But, as I stated, I think Jesus, if such a person existed, was a cool dude, and certainly more of an advocate of my positions toward my fellow man than many of the self-described "Christians" who post here. Check it out, Harry. There was no question there about what you put into quotes. Just a comment. I will not debate theology with you any further. It's not my area of expertise, and it's off-topic. So, tell me...are you just another mindless rightie, like so many of those who post here? Nope. I already said once that I'm a moderate. I have little use for extremists of any stripe. I have found most of them to be correct on one or two things, but dead wrong on most others. I have also found some that were dead wrong on *everything,* but I have never found one that was correct about *everything.* Take this for example: Remember the Obama/McCain/Hilton exchange on energy policy? Paris Hilton's contribution was meant to be a parody of the other two, but she actually made more sense than either extreme. If one of the candidates would take that sensible, moderate approach to the country's energy needs, he'd go a long way toward getting my vote. But instead, I hear little that makes sense from either side. That really scares me about our future, no matter who wins this race. Notice how I pulled the thread back toward global warming? TJ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More on Global Warming... | General | |||
Global Warming Fix | ASA | |||
More on Global Warming | General | |||
More On Global Warming | ASA | |||
OT More on Global Warming | General |