Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 26, 8:58*am, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 26, 8:48 am, hk wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:14:56 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:36:38 -0400, DownTime wrote: Why must I add yet another stupid plug-in this time "Microsoft Silverlight" to watch the video via Firefox? I tried IE, but its temporary per session and need to tolerate commercials. Screw em, I'll pass and will wait for the Youtube version. Hey, you're missing out on the next Microsoft antitrust saga. http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/...y/stream11.php http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/20/...t-silverlight/ http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/m...ves/123837.asp Does anybody find it highly amusing that Adobe, who in truth, controls almost 90% of streaming video via Flash and 75% of the digital video/imagery/text content on the web via CS3 and Reader is ****ed off about Silverlight being potential competition? Talk about the pot caling the kettle black. *:) I find "highly amusing" the discussions here about operating systems and * utilities/helper programs, especially the comments about operating systems certain posters don't use. I'm less of a fan of Adobe apps than I am of Microsoft apps. The less "flash" the better.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It always amazes me when someone buys their very first Mac, and all of a sudden they are experts.. Especially those who know little more about computers than the opening splash tells them.... You really are a hopelessly ignorant dumb foch. And you are a proven liar and story teller. But you just keep yapping, most times the more you talk the more you prove you don't know any more than google told you... |