Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,135
Default More problems for the Navy...

On Aug 14, 7:03*pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission. your a
Putz.


JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:
Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.
Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **
* * * * * John H
Tom's wife is a bull****ter?


I give up with the ever changing handles you, Tom, Scotty *and Reggie
have. *Try to keep a single handle so you are not accused of being
married to a bull****ter.


What is wrong with me using my official titles, bestowed upon me based
upon my diplomatic work with world leaders?


Nothing. Add Bull****ter and Snark to your certifications and you
will be complete.
  #52   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default More problems for the Navy...

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 7:03 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission. your a
Putz.
JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:
Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.
Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Tom's wife is a bull****ter?
I give up with the ever changing handles you, Tom, Scotty and Reggie
have. Try to keep a single handle so you are not accused of being
married to a bull****ter.

What is wrong with me using my official titles, bestowed upon me based
upon my diplomatic work with world leaders?


Nothing. Add Bull****ter and Snark to your certifications and you
will be complete.



Reggie is a turd, no matter how he describes himself. He's also the
biggest coward in the history of rec.boats.

  #53   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,533
Default More problems for the Navy...


"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission.
your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:


Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.


Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **


John H


Tom's wife is a bull****ter?


Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.


  #54   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,135
Default More problems for the Navy...

On Aug 14, 7:27*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:



and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission.
your a
Putz.


JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:


Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.


Why b Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **


John H


Tom's wife is a bull****ter?


Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.


With all the folks here using multiple handles lately..........why
bother?

BTW: Who's wife is a bull****ter?
  #55   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default More problems for the Navy...

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:27:39 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission.
your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:


Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.


Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **


John H


Tom's wife is a bull****ter?


Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.


Read? Actually read something? Do you have any idea whose behavior you're
trying to change?
--
** Good Day! **

John H


  #56   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default More problems for the Navy...

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.


Wow... talk about a **** storm!


Actually I found Harry's post offensive.


Thank you, I agree.

  #57   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default More problems for the Navy...


"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)



No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch



Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.


Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the sanitized,
civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch



  #58   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,135
Default More problems for the Navy...

On Aug 14, 8:01*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.


Wow... talk about a **** storm!


Actually I found Harry's post offensive.


Thank you, I agree.


NP.
  #59   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default More problems for the Navy...

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.
Wow... talk about a **** storm!

Actually I found Harry's post offensive.


Thank you, I agree.



Good. It was intended to be as offensive to you as you typically are to
me. Tit for tat. Or, in the vernacular...go foch yourself.
  #60   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,533
Default More problems for the Navy...


"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 7:27 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:



and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a
ducission.
your a
Putz.


JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:


Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.


Why b Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **


John H


Tom's wife is a bull****ter?


Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.


With all the folks here using multiple handles lately..........why
bother?

BTW: Who's wife is a bull****ter?
===================================

The point is you accuse someone that doesn't deserve it.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Go Navy! Capt. JG Cruising 20 February 24th 08 09:07 PM
Go Navy! Capt. JG ASA 16 February 23rd 08 08:29 AM
In the Navy... Short Wave Sportfishing General 9 July 12th 07 01:42 AM
Go Navy SUZY ASA 0 May 5th 06 02:39 AM
The New Navy = $$$ WalterScottGray General 15 November 17th 03 03:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017