|
USS New York
|
USS New York
|
USS New York
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:07:07 -0400, Eisboch wrote:
http://www.eisboch.com/ussny Two different ships there. LPD 21 is the USS New York. LPD 17? |
USS New York
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:31:17 -0500, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:07:07 -0400, Eisboch wrote: http://www.eisboch.com/ussny Two different ships there. LPD 21 is the USS New York. LPD 17? LPD 17 is the San Antonio. Interestingly, a previous USS New York, BB-34, had it's keel laid September 11, 1911. |
USS New York
On Aug 9, 9:45*am, hk wrote:
wrote: On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:07:07 -0400, Eisboch wrote: http://www.eisboch.com/ussny Two different ships there. *LPD 21 is the USS New York. *LPD 17? LPD 17 refers to the San Antonio, the first of that particular model, and the namesake for the class of amphibious transport dock ships. Interesting ship, but with very light defenses to ward off in-close attacks such as you might encounter when offloading. Not, however, as silly as the "stealth destroyer" (the DDG-1000 class), which was designed without the ability to fight off anti-ship missiles. Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (and Vice-Admiral) Barry McCullough said the "stealth" DDG-1000 "cannot perform area air defense" at all. $5 billion a copy. *Your tax dollars, ****ed away as usual by the DoD. In a perverse way, there is some good coming out of the proliferation of technology. Any semi-modern nation that wants them can develop or buy the weaponry needed to blow ships out of the water or planes out of the sky. As more and more nations get their hands on these goodies, more and more of them will realize that the way to real peace is not through warfare. $5 billion wasted on a useless ship. Imagine what you could do with $5 billion in some schitthole of a country where the population doesn't have housing, potable water, schools, medicine. -- Republicans - They Take Special Pride in their Ignorance. Well Good Morning Harry: How are things on your "acreage" this morning? |
USS New York
On Aug 9, 10:45*am, hk wrote:
wrote: On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:07:07 -0400, Eisboch wrote: http://www.eisboch.com/ussny Two different ships there. *LPD 21 is the USS New York. *LPD 17? LPD 17 refers to the San Antonio, the first of that particular model, and the namesake for the class of amphibious transport dock ships. Interesting ship, but with very light defenses to ward off in-close attacks such as you might encounter when offloading. Not, however, as silly as the "stealth destroyer" (the DDG-1000 class), which was designed without the ability to fight off anti-ship missiles. Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (and Vice-Admiral) Barry McCullough said the "stealth" DDG-1000 "cannot perform area air defense" at all. $5 billion a copy. *Your tax dollars, ****ed away as usual by the DoD. In a perverse way, there is some good coming out of the proliferation of technology. Any semi-modern nation that wants them can develop or buy the weaponry needed to blow ships out of the water or planes out of the sky. As more and more nations get their hands on these goodies, more and more of them will realize that the way to real peace is not through warfare. $5 billion wasted on a useless ship. Imagine what you could do with $5 billion in some schitthole of a country where the population doesn't have housing, potable water, schools, medicine. -- Republicans - They Take Special Pride in their Ignorance. Nice googling, asshole. |
USS New York
On Aug 9, 11:06*am, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 9, 9:45*am, hk wrote: wrote: On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:07:07 -0400, Eisboch wrote: http://www.eisboch.com/ussny Two different ships there. *LPD 21 is the USS New York. *LPD 17? LPD 17 refers to the San Antonio, the first of that particular model, and the namesake for the class of amphibious transport dock ships. Interesting ship, but with very light defenses to ward off in-close attacks such as you might encounter when offloading. Not, however, as silly as the "stealth destroyer" (the DDG-1000 class), which was designed without the ability to fight off anti-ship missiles. Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (and Vice-Admiral) Barry McCullough said the "stealth" DDG-1000 "cannot perform area air defense" at all. $5 billion a copy. *Your tax dollars, ****ed away as usual by the DoD.. In a perverse way, there is some good coming out of the proliferation of technology. Any semi-modern nation that wants them can develop or buy the weaponry needed to blow ships out of the water or planes out of the sky. As more and more nations get their hands on these goodies, more and more of them will realize that the way to real peace is not through warfare. $5 billion wasted on a useless ship. Imagine what you could do with $5 billion in some schitthole of a country where the population doesn't have housing, potable water, schools, medicine. -- Republicans - They Take Special Pride in their Ignorance. Well Good Morning Harry: *How are things on your "acreage" this morning?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - hehe!!!!! |
USS New York
"Eisboch" wrote in
: http://www.eisboch.com/ussny I got a better motto...... "HIDING THE EVIDENCE" Go download "September Clues" from alt.binaries.multimedia.documentaries, posted a few days ago. Your blood will boil! One TV network shows the Channel 4 helo shot of "plane 2" striking the 2nd tower. It's a clear day so you can see New Jersey laid out behind the towers, but you can't see any plane as the tower explodes. Another network shows the SAME EXACT SHOT with this black plane flying into the tower just before it explodes. That might be a little odd, it being the SAME VIDEO. What's MOST striking is NEW JERSEY IS GONE! All you see behind the towers looks like white fog....no buildings, no river, NO NEW JERSEY! They put the two videos side by side in the documentary. Against the backdrop of New Jersey coming towards you at a lower altitude they point out a faint "object", that later in yet ANOTHER video looks like some kind of ball-shaped object from further doctoring of the picture, a faint "object" that looks strangely like someone electronically wiped out whatever was in the picture. But the object wiped out was MUCH smaller than the black plane dubbed into that second network's New Jersey-less image. I think they rubbed out the image of the MISSILE on its way into blow up the building.....and network two used the black plane, which in yet another shot overshoots the mark and runs THROUGH the building to VERY briefly stick out the other side, UNDAMAGED, before there is a little fade-to-black to try to cover up the screwup. ONE shot.....THREE different images, completely, sloppily done in a hurry to get it on the air. You must see this video and hear the expert commentary from aviation experts in it. I don't think there were any airplanes at all. The explosion wreaks of MISSILE and always has. The USS New York was a great way to hide the forensic evidence, but they didn't get it all. Search You Tube for "Steven Jones", a physics professor at Brigham Young University. He's an expert in THERMATE, like was in the basement floors under the towers..... Bush and Cheney should be arrested at the swearing in ceremony, even if it delights Harry. It's getting harder and harder to just poke your head in the sand on 9/11....and believe the lies from the TV Propaganda Machine the Third Reich would have been in awe of. |
USS New York
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:50:04 +0000, Larry wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in m: http://www.eisboch.com/ussny I got a better motto...... "HIDING THE EVIDENCE" Go download "September Clues" from alt.binaries.multimedia.documentaries, posted a few days ago. Your blood will boil! One TV network shows the Channel 4 helo shot of "plane 2" striking the 2nd tower. It's a clear day so you can see New Jersey laid out behind the towers, but you can't see any plane as the tower explodes. Another network shows the SAME EXACT SHOT with this black plane flying into the tower just before it explodes. That might be a little odd, it being the SAME VIDEO. What's MOST striking is NEW JERSEY IS GONE! All you see behind the towers looks like white fog....no buildings, no river, NO NEW JERSEY! They put the two videos side by side in the documentary. Against the backdrop of New Jersey coming towards you at a lower altitude they point out a faint "object", that later in yet ANOTHER video looks like some kind of ball-shaped object from further doctoring of the picture, a faint "object" that looks strangely like someone electronically wiped out whatever was in the picture. But the object wiped out was MUCH smaller than the black plane dubbed into that second network's New Jersey-less image. I think they rubbed out the image of the MISSILE on its way into blow up the building.....and network two used the black plane, which in yet another shot overshoots the mark and runs THROUGH the building to VERY briefly stick out the other side, UNDAMAGED, before there is a little fade-to-black to try to cover up the screwup. ONE shot.....THREE different images, completely, sloppily done in a hurry to get it on the air. You must see this video and hear the expert commentary from aviation experts in it. I don't think there were any airplanes at all. The explosion wreaks of MISSILE and always has. The USS New York was a great way to hide the forensic evidence, but they didn't get it all. Search You Tube for "Steven Jones", a physics professor at Brigham Young University. He's an expert in THERMATE, like was in the basement floors under the towers..... Bush and Cheney should be arrested at the swearing in ceremony, even if it delights Harry. It's getting harder and harder to just poke your head in the sand on 9/11....and believe the lies from the TV Propaganda Machine the Third Reich would have been in awe of. Larry, you really ought to stick to generators and stuff. Or, maybe, find a group that is really into far out ****. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com