On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:44:29 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:30:46 GMT, Steve wrote:

I saw it live. There was a plane. What makes my blood boil is the
crap from conspiracy theorists that doesn't have to be put to the same
standards of truth as anything else before you believe it.

Damn, there's two of us who saw a plane. This could be the beginning
of a whole new conspiracy.

Anyone else?

Here are 2 problems with people like Larry:

1) They're so eager to jump onto a conspiracy theorist's bandwagon
that they're unwilling to hold the "evidence" presented to any level
of standards of truth. For instance, in the "September Clues" video,
when they're talking to the lady from Chealsea, they edit the audio
and cut out things she said that go against their conspiracy theory.
If that happened on the other side, the conspiracy theorists would be
all over it. Yet Larry is willing to let that slide. There are
*many* other examples of that.

2) They're like the little boy who cried wolf. I'm sure there really
are conspiracies to deceive the public out there by all sorts of
groups. But when people like Larry devote so much effort into
something like "September Clues", which, to anyone with more than 2
brain cells and a synapse is so obviously somewhere right between a
pile of poo and a crock of crap that can't stand up to even the
slightest scrutiny, they lose all credibility for when they really do
discover a true conspiracy.

Steve

On Aug 9, 11:19*pm, Steve wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:44:29 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:30:46 GMT, Steve wrote:

I saw it live. *There was a plane. *What makes my blood boil is the
crap from conspiracy theorists that doesn't have to be put to the same
standards of truth as anything else before you believe it.

Damn, there's two of us who saw a plane. *This could be the beginning
of a whole new conspiracy.

Anyone else?

Here are 2 problems with people like Larry:

1) They're so eager to jump onto a conspiracy theorist's bandwagon
that they're unwilling to hold the "evidence" presented to any level
of standards of truth. *For instance, in the "September Clues" video,
when they're talking to the lady from Chealsea, they edit the audio
and cut out things she said that go against their conspiracy theory.
If that happened on the other side, the conspiracy theorists would be
all over it. *Yet Larry is willing to let that slide. *There are
*many* other examples of that.

2) They're like the little boy who cried wolf. *I'm sure there really
are conspiracies to deceive the public out there by all sorts of
groups. *But when people like Larry devote so much effort into
something like "September Clues", which, to anyone with more than 2
brain cells and a synapse is so obviously somewhere right between a
pile of poo and a crock of crap that can't stand up to even the
slightest scrutiny, they lose all credibility for when they really do
discover a true conspiracy.

Steve

Oh for Christ sake, there were people on the ground and in buildings
that saw the planes. This whole idea is just retarted..