![]() |
New Trailerboat
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:20:18 -0400, hk wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:26:09 -0400, hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I realize there's not many here interested in boats, but there might be a few lurkers who are. This is a factory-supplied photo of a new offshore *fishing* boat that has just been launched by Parker. It is hull #1 of actual production. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...railerboat.jpg Yes, those are twin Yamaha F350s on the bracket. The boat is a 34-footer and does about 55 mph at WOT. I don't know what the market is for this boat. It certainly isn't a volume product. The interior is far less Spartan than is usual with a Parker, but it is still a fisherman's craft, so it isn't like your typical bubble boat in the main or forward cabin. The head, sink and shower are enclosed, there's a vee-berth forward, there's an actual mechanical/plumbing room. Main cabin has a command chair and a large area for electronics. There's a wrap around bench and table, and a sink, stove, refrigerator/freezer. That's what is easily visible. The cockpit has a large and pretty fancy (for Parker) 2nd command console. Pretty hefty trailer and tow vehicle, probably NOT an F150. I know you like Parkers, which is fine, but to me, this simply looks like a big, obese and overgrown version of the 25 footer. The huge Yamaha outboards further reinforce that image. It might look better if it was set up with twin inboard diesels. Some larger boats, like a Yellowfin 34 or 36 CC offshore fishing boat look natural with big outboards and they preserve space for fishing and gear. IMO, the Parker just doesn't look right with twin monsterous outboards. Maybe it's just the picture, sitting on the trailer with the tow vehicle shown in relationship to the boat/engines setup. It almost looks fake. One either likes the way Parkers look...or one doesn't. That's very true. I've been on the 23 T Big Bay boat that Parker makes - rugged, tough, no nonsense fishing boat - it's impressive and I like the way it looks. The 2100 is a nice boat for it's size too. If only they would change the color. That off white just doesn't do it for me. :) Hey. it's not a bubble boat, that's for sure. :) Depends on your definition of bubble boat. All that cabin up from with that hot house cabin (which is something I've never understood - every cabin Parker I've been on is hot as hell inside and you have to keep the boat moving to get any ventilation) it might as well be a bubble boat even if it doesn't look like a classic bubble boat. Interesting. When I owned one, I'd go into the main cabin in the hot summer to get away from the heat. It was much cooler inside the cabin with the opening front and side glass. White, as you know, reflects heat. Hey...these are fiberglass boats, white as God intended such boats to be. The Big Bay, btw, is a mod-vee hull, and isn't as deep in the cockpit (or the bottom) as the deep vees. Of course they aren't - it's a mod V just like mine. Different type of boat entirely. That 23' hull is now available as a work boat, with absolutely nothing on the interior deck. No console, no rigging, no nothing. There's a 21' version now, too. Workboat market. Parker's aren't white. Or what I consider white. :) Neither are "white people." |
New Trailerboat
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:10:23 -0400, hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Although I do like the way they extended the hull through to the bracket - that's pretty interesting. They had to. I was studying that also. It needs those massive extensions to the main stringers to support the weight of those engines. The bracket is exactly the same design as the one I had on my 25-foot Parker, just larger. The bracket is designed and built that way to add buoyancy at the stern when the boat is at rest. What you are seeing is NOT a bracket for the outboards resting on a hull extension, but, in fact, the bracket itself. It is through-bolted to the transom with hefty stainless steel bolts about every inch and a half along the flat portion. At least it was on my Parker. Therefore, there are no "massive extensions to the main stringers to support the weight of the engines." It could be, but I'd suspect that Eisboch is right - it almost has to be attached directly to the stringers. There's a lot of leverage on that stern for it not to be supported by the hull stringers. There is no real way to tell from the images, but I do like the concept of extending the hull form to the bracket. One of the complaints I've always had about outboard brackets similar to the ones on the Vector series Hydra-Sports is that they tend to bury the engine on take off and coming off plane. Even playing with the trim doesn't help any. Extra buoyancy under the bracket is a good thing - interesting application. There are several manufacturers of brackets with flotation chambers. Parker uses two of them that I know of to produce its custom designs. |
New Trailerboat
wrote:
On Aug 6, 10:47 am, wrote: On Aug 6, 8:54 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 6, 12:51 am, hk wrote: I realize there's not many here interested in boats, but there might be a few lurkers who are. This is a factory-supplied photo of a new offshore *fishing* boat that has just been launched by Parker. It is hull #1 of actual production. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/newtrail... Yes, those are twin Yamaha F350s on the bracket. The boat is a 34-footer and does about 55 mph at WOT. I don't know what the market is for this boat. It certainly isn't a volume product. The interior is far less Spartan than is usual with a Parker, but it is still a fisherman's craft, so it isn't like your typical bubble boat in the main or forward cabin. The head, sink and shower are enclosed, there's a vee-berth forward, there's an actual mechanical/plumbing room. Main cabin has a command chair and a large area for electronics. There's a wrap around bench and table, and a sink, stove, refrigerator/freezer. That's what is easily visible. The cockpit has a large and pretty fancy (for Parker) 2nd command console. Pretty hefty trailer and tow vehicle, probably NOT an F150. I thought you tried to get people here to believe you are quite the accomplished photographer? There is so much wrong with that picture that I don't know where to begin. ----------------------------- You missed the "factory supplied photo" part of his post. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nah, I didn't miss it, Harry has lauded his Photoshop abilities right along side his photographic abilities. I've not seen a thing from him ever that would lead one to believe he has skills in either. I have seen things from him that would lead one to believe he DOESN'T have the skills he claims though, such as crappy badly lit posed pictures and pictures he's posted as his own that actually were hijacked from a pro's site.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wafa's skills are propaganda. He made his way on the sweat of the rednecks he puts down so often, good hard working folks.. He really has never shown any skills in any field here that I can remember and I have been reading this list a long time. The one redeeming quality he has is he can interpret and rewrite what he googles to make it look like he knows what he is talking about. I am working again on my reader. My filters will include wafa, salty, jimh, and kanter for starters. I respect loyalty and decency so my list will also include anyone who can hold their nose and play with them too.... snerk Don't forget to filter out the cowardly "anonymous" posters here. |
New Trailerboat
wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 08:06:00 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Aug 6, 10:47 am, wrote: On Aug 6, 8:54 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 6, 12:51 am, hk wrote: I realize there's not many here interested in boats, but there might be a few lurkers who are. This is a factory-supplied photo of a new offshore *fishing* boat that has just been launched by Parker. It is hull #1 of actual production. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/newtrail... Yes, those are twin Yamaha F350s on the bracket. The boat is a 34-footer and does about 55 mph at WOT. I don't know what the market is for this boat. It certainly isn't a volume product. The interior is far less Spartan than is usual with a Parker, but it is still a fisherman's craft, so it isn't like your typical bubble boat in the main or forward cabin. The head, sink and shower are enclosed, there's a vee-berth forward, there's an actual mechanical/plumbing room. Main cabin has a command chair and a large area for electronics. There's a wrap around bench and table, and a sink, stove, refrigerator/freezer. That's what is easily visible. The cockpit has a large and pretty fancy (for Parker) 2nd command console. Pretty hefty trailer and tow vehicle, probably NOT an F150. I thought you tried to get people here to believe you are quite the accomplished photographer? There is so much wrong with that picture that I don't know where to begin. ----------------------------- You missed the "factory supplied photo" part of his post. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nah, I didn't miss it, Harry has lauded his Photoshop abilities right along side his photographic abilities. I've not seen a thing from him ever that would lead one to believe he has skills in either. I have seen things from him that would lead one to believe he DOESN'T have the skills he claims though, such as crappy badly lit posed pictures and pictures he's posted as his own that actually were hijacked from a pro's site.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wafa's skills are propaganda. He made his way on the sweat of the rednecks he puts down so often, good hard working folks.. He really has never shown any skills in any field here that I can remember and I have been reading this list a long time. The one redeeming quality he has is he can interpret and rewrite what he googles to make it look like he knows what he is talking about. I am working again on my reader. My filters will include wafa, salty, jimh, and kanter for starters. I respect loyalty and decency so my list will also include anyone who can hold their nose and play with them too.... I can hardly wait! Once you have me filtered, I won't have to see your weak-willed responses to my posts about you. You'll be even more defenseless ...if that's possible. I don't think you have the guts to filter me out. Lets just see, shall we? Gosh, if JustWait filters us out, he'll be reduced to exchanging badinage with the likes of Loogy, Florida Jim, and the rest of the low IQ'ers. |
New Trailerboat
On Aug 6, 11:02*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:16:31 -0400, hk wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:08:52 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message om... I realize there's not many here interested in boats, but there might be a few lurkers who are. This is a factory-supplied photo of a new offshore *fishing* boat that has just been launched by Parker. It is hull #1 of actual production. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/newtrail.... Yes, those are twin Yamaha F350s on the bracket. The boat is a 34-footer and does about 55 mph at WOT. I don't know what the market is for this boat. It certainly isn't a volume product. The interior is far less Spartan than is usual with a Parker, but it is still a fisherman's craft, so it isn't like your typical bubble boat in the main or forward cabin. The head, sink and shower are enclosed, there's a vee-berth forward, there's an actual mechanical/plumbing room. Main cabin has a command chair and a large area for electronics. There's a wrap around bench and table, and a sink, stove, refrigerator/freezer.. That's what is easily visible. The cockpit has a large and pretty fancy (for Parker) 2nd command console. Pretty hefty trailer and tow vehicle, probably NOT an F150. I know you like Parkers, which is fine, but to me, this simply looks like a big, obese and overgrown version of the 25 footer. The huge Yamaha outboards further reinforce that image. *It might look better if it was set up with twin inboard diesels. *Some larger boats, like a Yellowfin 34 or 36 CC offshore fishing boat look natural with big outboards and they preserve space for fishing and gear. *IMO, the Parker just doesn't look right with twin monsterous outboards. What struck me was how unbalanced the boat looks on dry land - all that cabin up front, huge stern deck and then the engines. *It just looks unbalanced. *I'm sure it's a sound boat - Parker doesn't build junk boats - it just looks odd. Yeah, odd is a much better word. It's just a bit bigger than you are used to seeing in that size boat. True enough. Put it another way...if I removed the center console from my Parker, I believe your Ranger would fit inside and you wouldn't see your boat's gunnels, and our boats are about the same length. Nope - they would match up pretty well - the only thing your boat that makes it different is that it's a little longer than mine while mine is marginally wider (8'8" vs 8'6") and your sides may be slightly taller from the chine to the top of the gunwale. Here's an interesting exercise for us to try - measure from the keel to the highest point of the gunwale, measure the broadest points gunwale-to-gunwale, and the overall length. *Use the following formula - Length times breadth (side-to-side at it's broadest point) times depth (keel to highest point on gunwale) times .67 and divide that by 100. I'll bet your GT and mine are within 5% of each other. These are pilothouse style boats, and very traditional in proportions. The cockpit is huge so as to accommodate the largest possible number of fishermen. You obviously prefer a different style. I've always liked workboat type boats. Totally agree with that. *As Eisboch says, to each their own. From guys I've talked to, Parkers have their following - which is cool - every guy has their favorite (or dream) boat. *I know guys who only buy Grady's and wouldn't consider any other boat. Same with a ton of other vessels. *And Parker does build a quality boat - over and over and over again which is my main complaint - there are marginal differences from year-to-year - the styling just hasn't been updated. Consider the venerable Novi hull as an example - the base style and function stays the same, but there are differences depending on the manufacturer. *You can look at a classic Novi hull and say, yep - that's a Novi hull, but you can tell differences between hulls by how long the forefoot is, the tumblehome at the stern - bow flare, etc. That's a proven hull design which has been adapted and changed mainly for style reasons - the base hull design has never changed. *I've seen different year Parkers and they all look the same - no changes. I just don't like static designs, but it works for you and that's great.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Everything about Harry is "static". One look at him will tell you that. |
New Trailerboat
"hk" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Aug 6, 10:47 am, wrote: On Aug 6, 8:54 am, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 6, 12:51 am, hk wrote: I realize there's not many here interested in boats, but there might be a few lurkers who are. This is a factory-supplied photo of a new offshore *fishing* boat that has just been launched by Parker. It is hull #1 of actual production. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/newtrail... Yes, those are twin Yamaha F350s on the bracket. The boat is a 34-footer and does about 55 mph at WOT. I don't know what the market is for this boat. It certainly isn't a volume product. The interior is far less Spartan than is usual with a Parker, but it is still a fisherman's craft, so it isn't like your typical bubble boat in the main or forward cabin. The head, sink and shower are enclosed, there's a vee-berth forward, there's an actual mechanical/plumbing room. Main cabin has a command chair and a large area for electronics. There's a wrap around bench and table, and a sink, stove, refrigerator/freezer. That's what is easily visible. The cockpit has a large and pretty fancy (for Parker) 2nd command console. Pretty hefty trailer and tow vehicle, probably NOT an F150. I thought you tried to get people here to believe you are quite the accomplished photographer? There is so much wrong with that picture that I don't know where to begin. ----------------------------- You missed the "factory supplied photo" part of his post. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nah, I didn't miss it, Harry has lauded his Photoshop abilities right along side his photographic abilities. I've not seen a thing from him ever that would lead one to believe he has skills in either. I have seen things from him that would lead one to believe he DOESN'T have the skills he claims though, such as crappy badly lit posed pictures and pictures he's posted as his own that actually were hijacked from a pro's site.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wafa's skills are propaganda. He made his way on the sweat of the rednecks he puts down so often, good hard working folks.. He really has never shown any skills in any field here that I can remember and I have been reading this list a long time. The one redeeming quality he has is he can interpret and rewrite what he googles to make it look like he knows what he is talking about. I am working again on my reader. My filters will include wafa, salty, jimh, and kanter for starters. I respect loyalty and decency so my list will also include anyone who can hold their nose and play with them too.... snerk Don't forget to filter out the cowardly "anonymous" posters here. anonymous like Harry Krause? Did you pick that name out of the phone book? |
New Trailerboat
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:41:10 -0400, hk wrote:
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ailerboat2.jpg SW Tom won't like this boat, either. No metalflake. It's a white boat, the color God intended for fiberglass. :) Looks real "American" with that picket fence on the roof. Is there a garden behind there? (-: --Vic |
New Trailerboat
On Aug 6, 7:29*am, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Although I do like the way they extended the hull through to the bracket - that's pretty interesting. They had to. *I was studying that also. *It needs those massive extensions to the main stringers to support the weight of thoseengines. Eisboch The bracket is exactly the same design as the one I had on my 25-foot Parker, just larger. The bracket is designed and built that way to add buoyancy at the stern when the boat is at rest. What you are seeing is NOT a bracket for the outboards resting on a hull extension, but, in fact, the bracket itself. It is through-bolted to the transom with hefty stainless steel bolts about every inch and a half along the flat portion. At least it was on myParker. Therefore, there are no "massive extensions to the main stringers to support the weight of theengines." Well, in my humble, unqualified opinion .... there "should" be. Although, I suppose the idea might be that if the boat is subjected to a heavy pounding, it's better to let the bracket snap off along with the engines, rather than compromise hull integrity by damaging the stringers.. Eisboch The bracket isn't going to "snap off." These boats are built like tanks.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Monster tub, massive stringers, goliath-like brackets, giant outboards, forward cabin, Hey! Parker might have gotten their ideas from here! http://thebayguide.com/rec.boats/karen.html |
New Trailerboat
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:14:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Aug 6, 7:29*am, hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Although I do like the way they extended the hull through to the bracket - that's pretty interesting. They had to. *I was studying that also. *It needs those massive extensions to the main stringers to support the weight of thoseengines. Eisboch The bracket is exactly the same design as the one I had on my 25-foot Parker, just larger. The bracket is designed and built that way to add buoyancy at the stern when the boat is at rest. What you are seeing is NOT a bracket for the outboards resting on a hull extension, but, in fact, the bracket itself. It is through-bolted to the transom with hefty stainless steel bolts about every inch and a half along the flat portion. At least it was on myParker. Therefore, there are no "massive extensions to the main stringers to support the weight of theengines." Well, in my humble, unqualified opinion .... there "should" be. Although, I suppose the idea might be that if the boat is subjected to a heavy pounding, it's better to let the bracket snap off along with the engines, rather than compromise hull integrity by damaging the stringers. The bracket isn't going to "snap off." These boats are built like tanks.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Monster tub, massive stringers, goliath-like brackets, giant outboards, forward cabin, Hey! Parker might have gotten their ideas from here! http://thebayguide.com/rec.boats/karen.html ROTFL!!! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com