GM loses big-time
|
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Thank God most people realize they can't rely on social security alone in their retirement. Eisboch Yeah, well that wasn't the point, was it... |
GM loses big-time
"hk" wrote in message . .. I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Thank God most people realize they can't rely on social security alone in their retirement. Eisboch Yeah, well that wasn't the point, was it... Oh...and it's not that all corporations are bad all the time. While HP's telephone customer service for its comsumer products now sucks (it's been moved offshore and the phones are answered by automatons who can only read off a script), there still are a few thinking people employed at the company. One of my cats has decided the top of my little HP color laser printer is the best place to nap. The output tray at the rear of the machine apparently was annoying him, so he bounced on it until he broke it off. I sent an email to HP (I knew better than to call), and got a response that a new tray was being sent to me gratis, but that I would have to pay the $7 shipping charge. More than fair. They want a photo of the cat, too. |
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 9:20*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in messagenews:SdCdnTQC6JDYkw7VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comca st.com... I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, *it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. Yes he does! He's wished injury or death on several people here. |
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. |
GM loses big-time
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. What Harry is really saying: Free choice in shopping is fine as long as I can tell people what their choices are. |
GM loses big-time
"hk" wrote in message . .. Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you. Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
"D.Duck" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Historically the "market" returns an annual average 10% return. Is that flim-flam? Please don't confuse this issue with facts. Eisboch |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com