OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:12:57 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:


If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?



Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic


Please refrain from exercising your remaining brain cells. We are supposed
to be in the "forget" mode.
You're making the rest of us look bad.

OK. I just forgot to remember to comment in another thread on balance
of trade, national debt, globalistic practices weakening America,
actually producing what you use and some other things that......I
forgot.

--Vic

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jul 16, 9:51 am, JimH wrote:
On Jul 16, 9:28 am, "Don White" wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message

...

You don't close cases around here Jimmy boy. And we don't STFU because
a
deranged nincompoop tells us to.

Yeah but...just think how much the newsgroup would improve if you did.

Florida Jim has no interest in improving the tone and quality of this
NG.

Take a look at Don's latest contribution to the group. How does that
improve the group? How does telling people to STFU improve the tone
and quality of the group? How does your boyfriend WAFA's constant name
calling, and third grade insults improve the quality and tone of the
group? How does his constant lies improve the quality and tone of the
group?

I thought you left?

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:30:27 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:57:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:11:21 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Jul 16, 9:51 am, JimH wrote:
On Jul 16, 9:28 am, "Don White" wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message

...

You don't close cases around here Jimmy boy. And we don't STFU
because a
deranged nincompoop tells us to.

Yeah but...just think how much the newsgroup would improve if you
did.

Florida Jim has no interest in improving the tone and quality of this
NG.

Take a look at Don's latest contribution to the group. How does that
improve the group? How does telling people to STFU improve the tone
and quality of the group? How does your boyfriend WAFA's constant name
calling, and third grade insults improve the quality and tone of the
group? How does his constant lies improve the quality and tone of the
group?

I think it's pretty clear by now that NO ONE is interested in
improving the tone of the group. All sides continue to bait, and point
fingers. Not a one of you is helping things. Just a bunch of whiny,
ineffectual, pussies. EVERY_SINGLE_ONE



You're wrong. But that's OK.

It's definitely true that there are plenty of folks on both sides who
don't
give a crap. But to say 'NO ONE' is inaccurate. Are you including
yourself?

Sure. I'm not expending any great energy trying to fix the group.
There are some participants that I barely pay any attention to when
they post, and if it gets to the point where my eyes glaze over and
there's nothing entertaining enough, I'll probably stop bothering to
keep it on my list of regular stops. It's not that important to me.
There are many thousands of other groups on a variety of subjects
where I can waste the same amount of time. Whether I visit or even
post here doesn't make any difference. There are newsgroups where I
was a very active regular for many, many years that I haven't looked
at in years. I lost interest for one reason or another.
What separates me from you, Harry, Don, The Jims, loogyfreaks, etc, is
that I think you are all essentially the same, and all are the
problem. Even the ones who pretend to be peacemakers or the voice of
reason always manage to keep it going in the same direction. I don't
think any of you wants to improve the group. If you did, it would have
happened a long time ago. You are a bunch of talkers, not do-ers. As I
said, you all run around stirring up nonsense and old bull****, and at
the same time point fingers at everyone else. None of you REALLY wants
to improve the group, and I frankly don't care that much either way.


Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:


Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Just in case, yes. But I hardly ever bother. Too easily spoofed, and
my interests don't go that way.
As you can see.

--Vic

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:


Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic



I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.


Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with agitators,
instigators & enablers.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:48:33 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:


Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic



I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I use.


The header of a post does not reveal the newsreader used unless one has
turned on 'Show All Header Fields'. I don't normally wish to see all the
header fields because then I must scroll down to read the message. Do you
keep the header fields shown all the time?

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:09:47 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:56:01 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:48:33 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:


Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic



I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I use.


The header of a post does not reveal the newsreader used unless one has
turned on 'Show All Header Fields'. I don't normally wish to see all the
header fields because then I must scroll down to read the message. Do you
keep the header fields shown all the time?

No, but Vic posted as if he knew what reader I was using, when he is
obviously clueless. This was a case where an intelligent person would
have looked at the headers before posting. He also can't seem to
directly answer simple and completely unambiguous questions.


The 'un-ambiguity' may be in the eyes of the beholder. Headers, at least in
Agent, are not the same as 'Header Fields'.

You asked Vic if he could read headers. He answered that he could. You
responded with a less than flattering comment, because you were referring
to headers when you meant header fields.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 8:54*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:20:29 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:09:47 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:56:01 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:48:33 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0
as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.
--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could
read headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader I use.


The header of a post does not reveal the newsreader used unless one
has
turned on 'Show All Header Fields'. I don't normally wish to see
all the
header fields because then I must scroll down to read the message.
Do you
keep the header fields shown all the time?
No, but Vic posted as if he knew what reader I was using, when he is
obviously clueless. This was a case where an intelligent person would
have looked at the headers before posting. He also can't seem to
directly answer simple and completely unambiguous questions.
The 'un-ambiguity' may be in the eyes of the beholder. Headers, at
least in
Agent, are not the same as 'Header Fields'.
You asked Vic if he could read headers. He answered that he could. You
responded with a less than flattering comment, because you were
referring
to headers when you meant header fields.

Sure, Harry. Whatever you say.

Harry is way out of his depth of knowledge when speaking about all
things USENET. I proved that a couple of years ago when I outed him.



Whooooooosh.

Start over, braindead.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves. You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:03*pm, wrote:
On Jul 17, 8:54*am, "Don White" wrote:



wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.

Why not take responsibility for your juvenile behavior here rather
than blaming it on others.

You just do not have any self control.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:08*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:
Can you read headers?
Does the bear **** in the woods?
--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?
Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.
--Vic
I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.
Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.

"...the group has *went* backwards..."

Crikey, what an uneducated, ignorant ass you are, Loogy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, I wish I'd have wasted my life with a liberal arts degree so
that I could use correct grammer at all times in usenet, idiot.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:33*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves. You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in a
New York second. *They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate..........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. *Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:37*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 17, 12:03*pm, wrote:





On Jul 17, 8:54*am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.

Why not take responsibility for your juvenile behavior here rather
than blaming it on others.

You just do not have any self control.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you haven't seen any of the hundreds of Harry posts here the
last few weeks? Either that, or you're not bright enough to understand
the dynamics.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:48:33 -0400, wrote:



I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I use.

Well, I answered this before. I'll add there is no reason for me to
care what reader you use by looking at header fields.
I've pretty much given up on usenet Dick Tracy activities, and hardly
ever engage in "technical" discussions since I retired from that.
My original reply to you was to correct the misinformation you posted
about retrieving messages from "unsubscribed" groups with Agent
versions prior to 2.0.
I naturally assumed you had moved on to a newer version because
you seem intelligent enough not to post misinformation about the very
version you are currently using to make the post.
Anyway, my intent was to be helpful.
I wasn't playing "gotcha." You are free to think of me as you chose.
God Bless America!

--Vic

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!


Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.


Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with agitators,
instigators & enablers.



Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure
hope you are not reflective of most Canadians

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I use.


Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs
to inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.


Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure
hope you are not reflective of most Canadians

He's not very bright. I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. He's just dumb - in the literal sense.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

"DK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:
Can you read headers?
Does the bear **** in the woods?
--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?
Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.
--Vic
I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I
use.
Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate..........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Wow! Dummy Don posted more than one line. Freakin amazing! What's
interesting is that he not only admits to *never* leaving (a lie) but he
also admits that he is part of a tiny gang - or at least a screwed up
conspiracy of rabid losers.

What a huge favoursic he/they is/are doing for you.

Loogy, Justwait & JohnH are worth more than a one liner..... you, Flatulent
Jim, Whine etc.......... a one worder would be more than sufficient.
Anyway..learn to read for content. I admitted nothing.... I said I left and
I did. You were the dumbass that invited me back, so if anyone else here
has a problem with me, they can thank you.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 7:35*pm, DK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:



Don White wrote:
wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs
to inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.

Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. *I sure
hope you are not reflective of most Canadians

He's not very bright. *I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. *He's just dumb - in the literal sense.


Read the responses from DK, Reggie Loogy and BAR and ask yourself if
you think they really want to improve the tone and quality of this NG
or just want to continue to blame others for it's downfall.

A bunch of old men acting like children.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

"DK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.


Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.


Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure hope
you are not reflective of most Canadians

He's not very bright. I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. He's just dumb - in the literal sense.

Tell your girlfriend I sure hope he isn't a prime example of Georgia
residents. (not withstanding the 'Deliverence set')

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

Don White wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.

Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure hope
you are not reflective of most Canadians
He's not very bright. I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. He's just dumb - in the literal sense.

Tell your girlfriend I sure hope he isn't a prime example of Georgia
residents. (not withstanding the 'Deliverence set')




Most of the dialog from the Seven Dwarfs is right out of Deliverance.
Loogy is the banjo boy.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 4:02*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------**------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later..
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate..........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! *Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jul 17, 4:02 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------**------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

Hey..if you don't like it, complain to Freddy Kruger He invited us back..

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 18, 9:19*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 4:02 pm, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------***------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

Hey..if you don't like it, complain to Freddy Kruger * He invited us back..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And I'm invited you (as in you, Harry, and JimH) to leave! See ya!

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 18, 10:41*am, wrote:
On Jul 18, 9:19*am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 4:02 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------****------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

Hey..if you don't like it, complain to Freddy Kruger * He invited us back..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And I'm invited you (as in you, Harry, and JimH) to leave! See ya!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd like to see a bunch of idiots in this group gone but you told us
all you were leaving so by all means gtf out.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 18, 11:40*am, wrote:
On Jul 18, 10:41*am, wrote:





On Jul 18, 9:19*am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 4:02 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*****------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory..- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

Hey..if you don't like it, complain to Freddy Kruger * He invited us back..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And I'm invited you (as in you, Harry, and JimH) to leave! See ya!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd like to see a bunch of idiots in this group gone but you told us
all you were leaving so by all means gtf out.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No I didn't.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?