About Us

harry krause

lid wrote:
On Thu, 08 May 08, (Geoff Miller) wrote:
It obviously
had some advantage over a conventional hull, but what
was it? And why did the design fall out of favor with
manufacturers?

Side to side stability was noticeably better. It also gives you much
more room forward than a standard hull which creates numerous design
layout options for storage, casting deck, larger cuddy, etc. Most were
relatively flat bottomed aft so were able to operate in thinner water.
As to ride, the original idea was that the upward spray created by the
center hull would be trapped under the outer sponsons which would then
cushion the ride a bit. That theory held water (ugh... sorry) in some
of the Thunderbird models but most manufacturers modified the design
to a great extent and wasted that advantage. Becasue of that,
eventually, the stereotype reputation of "rough ride" developed
because most people simply don't realize that all cathedrals do NOT
ride alike. Fact is, even though the oldest Thunderbirds were rough,
they were very strong, safe and seaworthy in rough weather but you
just had to slow them down quite a bit.
Before their demise (or sale rather), Thunderbird was building
cathedrals with a deeper center hull with much smaller sponsons. Those
boats rode as well as any of their deep V counterparts. But it was too
late. The market had already concluded that cathedral = rough ride,
and even the easiest riding Thunderbirds didn't sell well.
My first Thunderbird was a 1964 (+/-) model which served its purpose
well. I was very young and could take a beating without much thought.
I later ordered a 1971 T'bird Commanche. That boat rides like a deep V
and still has the advantages of the cathedral. Since then, I've bought
and sold more boats than I can track but I've never found one as
versatile all around or one I like better than that 1971 Thunderbird.

Rick

I remember when they first came out. My father carried a few from one of
his fiberglass boat lines. Don't remember the brand name. I do remember
that we both thought they rode hard and sometimes had an incredible
amount of bow rise in certain head seas.

Most of the outboard runabout boats in those days were not deep vee, but
had rounded chines, like the Lymans, Cruisers, Inc., and Wolverines, and
many other brand news. These boats rode pretty well. The Wolverines had
"clipper" bows and rode drier than the Lymans.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?"	Tim	General	51	March 1st 08 05:38 PM
"Jeffrey Boyd" is an anagram of "Midget Runt" in Japanese	Steve Leyland	ASA	5	October 21st 07 03:54 PM
Battery with "Double the Power" or that takes up "Half the Space"	Bart	ASA	2	December 6th 06 12:26 AM
Marinco 15 Amp "Marine Grade" 120VAC Receptical v. Leviton "terrestrial grade"	Bob	Boat Building	6	April 3rd 06 04:24 PM

Menu

About Us