|
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
|
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
D.Duck wrote:
wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Oh, be nice. Loogy-for-Brains can't even explain what *he* is saying. The guy is a cipher. :) |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
|
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
Harry Krause wrote:
Oh, be nice. Loogy-for-Brains can't even explain what *he* is saying. The guy is a cipher. :) That would be as opposed to you, eh Krausie, who is a major neurotic, possible minor psychotic who infests various websites with your defective mental and emotional abberations. Have you ever thought about going out a living with the Amish. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:07:59 -0500, "William Bruce"
wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Oh, be nice. Loogy-for-Brains can't even explain what *he* is saying. The guy is a cipher. :) That would be as opposed to you, eh Krausie, who is a major neurotic, possible minor psychotic who infests various websites with your defective mental and emotional abberations. Have you ever thought about going out a living with the Amish. Ignore him. He hates it. -- John *H* |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On Apr 30, 6:22*pm, HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. *Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Oh, be nice. Loogy-for-Brains can't even explain what *he* is saying. The guy is a cipher. * :) Awe, how cute! As usual, the pussy Harry hides behind his Bozo's bin and calls names. Typical of someone with a third grade mentality. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On Apr 30, 5:59*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. *Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 8:32*am, wrote:
On Apr 30, 5:59*pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. *Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Well it should be easy for a 13 yo, most of em' still watch cartoons and that is what this guy is... What, you think the clown is whata? Clever? ha ha... The guy needs a job and a girlfreind.... |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 8:35*am, wrote:
On May 1, 8:32*am, wrote: On Apr 30, 5:59*pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. *Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Well it should be easy for a 13 yo, most of em' still watch cartoons and that is what this guy is... *What, you think the clown is whata? Clever? ha ha... The guy needs a job and a girlfreind.... Wow, Scott, I'm REALLY surprised that you don't get it........ |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 9:03*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 9:40*am, wrote:
On May 1, 8:35*am, wrote: On May 1, 8:32*am, wrote: On Apr 30, 5:59*pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. *Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Well it should be easy for a 13 yo, most of em' still watch cartoons and that is what this guy is... *What, you think the clown is whata? Clever? ha ha... The guy needs a job and a girlfreind.... Wow, Scott, I'm REALLY surprised that you don't get it........- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you have to imagine me at about 25 yo running a small neighborhood bar and grille. The owner about 80 and from Poland comes in the back door steaming. With his thick accent he screams in front of all the patrons "Hey Stupid" stops and thinks for a second.. "Sorry, don't mean to be disrespectful" stops another second then continues "Mr. Stupid, come over here I need to talk to you;)" He had a way with words.... Smile Loogie, enjoy your fishing. Tom will tell you, I am the "simple man" Ronni was talking about when his momma said "be a simple kind of man", but I did get the guys implication, YOU indeed missed the sarcasm of me calling him a joke... |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 9:49*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sounds to me like the guy is talking about Pelosi and the "Pelosi Premium" on gasoline and the economy. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 9:49*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or wrong? |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 2:11*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. *I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". *If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. *Right or wrong?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do....... Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it? |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... On May 1, 2:11 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or wrong?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do....... Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it? =============================== Analogy. The fishermen were catching fish. Does that mean that "all" fishermen were catching fish? |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 1, 5:24*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 1, 2:11 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying.. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or wrong?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do....... Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it? =============================== Analogy. *The fishermen were catching fish. *Does that mean that "all" fishermen were catching fish?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... On May 1, 5:24 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 2:11 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or wrong?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do....... Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it? =============================== Analogy. The fishermen were catching fish. Does that mean that "all" fishermen were catching fish?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes. ============================= I don't thiiiink so. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 2, 10:37*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 1, 5:24 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 2:11 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or wrong?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do....... Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it? =============================== Analogy. The fishermen were catching fish. Does that mean that "all" fishermen were catching fish?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes. ============================= I don't thiiiink so.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, so you think the sentence The fishermen were catching fish implies that only some were catching fish????? |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
wrote in message ... On May 2, 10:37 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 5:24 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 2:11 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or wrong?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do....... Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it? =============================== Analogy. The fishermen were catching fish. Does that mean that "all" fishermen were catching fish?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes. ============================= I don't thiiiink so.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, so you think the sentence The fishermen were catching fish implies that only some were catching fish????? =================================== It sure doesn't mean all fishermen were catching fish. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
On May 2, 4:31*pm, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2008 13:23:48 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On May 2, 10:37*am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 1, 5:24 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 1, 2:11 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726 Finally someone gets it..... I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying? Are you SERIOUS???? You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying. Hell, my thirteen year old understood it. Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists? WHOOOSH.......... Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way over your head. If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government leadership are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better check with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - whoosh........ again. If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach you quite alot. ====================================== Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here. I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or wrong?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do....... Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it? =============================== Analogy. The fishermen were catching fish. Does that mean that "all" fishermen were catching fish?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes. ============================= I don't thiiiink so.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, so you think the sentence The fishermen were catching fish implies that only some were catching fish????? I've been out fishing and watched boats around me get fish as I've been skunked. I was one of the fishermen, but I wasn't catching fish. Has that never happened to you? I chalked it up to the bait. I was using a frozen chum log, but the commercial guys were grinding their own chum right there on the boat. -- John *H*- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Of course it's happened to me, but you are missing the point. |
OT This guy is right about Terrorism!
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com