Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 24, 9:22*am, wrote:
"jamesgangnc" wrote: I think you are confused about how inboard engine boat cooling systems work. No, I'm not confused. I've owned and maintained a number of inboards. Moreso than I/Os. Both gasoline and diesel. *I'm apparently just not communicating my thoughts very well. All of them have a pump that supplies water from the outside. And you can maintain them without hauling the boat in half the time and half the effort of an I/O. On the rest it's usually mounted on the front lower side of the engine. Good idea. No impeller in the leg at all? All of mine had an impeller in the lower outdrive except one with it on the top. As to the reason, it let them build a boat with some of the advantages of an outboards but without the finicky, easily damaged, aluminum 2 stroke engines. And with a lot more power to push much larger boats. Outboards didn't have nearly the HP back then as they have now. I think the basic idea for the I/O was valid and sound. I just don't think the designers put enough thought outside their box. They could have built a much less complex and more maintenace free system. One with something more than rubber boots between it and sinking. But they didn't and the market responded by demanding huge outboards. Which it now has. I'm not saying I/Os are a bad idea. I'm saying they could have been less complex which usually means better. Rick Your earlier post "Whether or not they use a standard automotive pump or a special marine design that's self priming, I'm not sure." lead me to think you didn't understand. Because they all use both pumps. The difference between the alphas and the bravo/volvo/trs/etc drives is that the alphas continue to use the raw water pump in the leg while the others used a belt driven raw water pump on the engine. And you'll get no arguement out of me that the raw water pump in the engine compartment is way better and much easier to service. I was only discussing how it got where it is. The orginal merc drive went through several minor design improvements to give us the 2nd generation alpha we have today. And engineering wise it is still not even close to state of the art. But it works and has proven to be a pretty reliable platform. Volume made it extremely cheap at the bulk level. That kept it around. Merc as well as others have designed much better outdrives. They simply cost more and many consumers don't appreciate the difference therefore consumers don't want to pay the difference. That volume is changing and more modern i/os are a bigger part of the market now. I'm not saying the i/o is "better" that the other two propulsion solutions. All 3 have their pros and cons. How those factor in also depends on the application. In some situations the i/o pros make it attractive. And there really isn't a real higher risk of sinking because the i/o has a rubber boot coupling the drive to the exterior prop assembly. The i/o is far more likely to survive a high speed hard strike to the drive train without compromising the hull integrity that a conventional inboard. The i/o absorbes most of the force in the gear train and typically destroys props, gears, and couplings. The i/o physical unit is typically kicked up rather than sheared off the transom. On a conventional inboard usually the prop shaft is ripped out or severely bent and there is frequently compromise to the rear lower hull or stuffing box. Of course the outboard installation will also kick up and often can stand anything up to and including being ripped clean off the back without compromising hull integrity. I don't think the hp difference was all that great, merc had some pretty big inline 4s and 6s early in the outboard game. While they did not match the hp of the early small block v8 engines if you factor in the weight difference they were pretty powerful engines. Inboards with automotive engines already predated i/os. So the larger boats did not need i/os. Outboards simply don't attract a significant part of the consumer base. Never have. It's all about what sells first and engineering is always second to that. That's not unique to boats, that is true in everything. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mercruiser 470 alternator conversion | General | |||
Mercruiser Quadraflush Carb Q | General | |||
Volvo Penta AQ120B Weber Carb Conversion Kit FS | General | |||
Mercruiser 3.0 >>> V-8 Conversion... | General | |||
5.7L Mercruiser Carb change? | General |