Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:22:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

My takeaway is I don't want Vista yet, but not necessarily because of
Explorer, since I've been using Powerdesk Pro for years as my file
manager.
Don't know if Powerdesk obviates this Vista issue, but Total
Commander, another file manager, is supposed to.

A lot of application software that worked fine under Win2K and XP does
not work under Vista, and people are still having trouble finding 64
bit drivers for many devices.



I'd like to see a recent list of contemporary application software that
worked under XP and does not work under VISTA. A lotta list, eh? And I
am sure the advanced home users in this newsgroup are running older
64-bit versions of windows.

"HK" wrote in message
...

I'd like to see a recent list of contemporary application software that
worked under XP and does not work under VISTA. A lotta list, eh? And I am
sure the advanced home users in this newsgroup are running older 64-bit
versions of windows.


"Results 1 - 10 of about 3,260,000 for software that works with xp but not
vista. (0.31 seconds) "

Eisboch (hehehe)

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:55:50 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

I'd like to see a recent list of contemporary application software that
worked under XP and does not work under VISTA. A lotta list, eh? And I am
sure the advanced home users in this newsgroup are running older 64-bit
versions of windows.


"Results 1 - 10 of about 3,260,000 for software that works with xp but not
vista. (0.31 seconds) "

Eisboch (hehehe)

=========================

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...& btnG=Search

~~snerk~~

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:55:50 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

I'd like to see a recent list of contemporary application software that
worked under XP and does not work under VISTA. A lotta list, eh? And I am
sure the advanced home users in this newsgroup are running older 64-bit
versions of windows.

"Results 1 - 10 of about 3,260,000 for software that works with xp but not
vista. (0.31 seconds) "

Eisboch (hehehe)

=========================

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...& btnG=Search

~~snerk~~



Snerk yourself...that list is full of b.s.

"I had the same problem after installing Vista 32 bit. To get past it, I
had to uninstall the program then reinstall it. When I reinstalled, I
used the "Run as Administrator" to execute the .exe installation file."

Yeah, well, it ran...and it would have run if the original poster in
that thread had any understanding of what he was doing.

Unimpressed.

On Apr 7, 9:27*pm, HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:55:50 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

I'd like to see a recent list of contemporary application software that
worked under XP and does not work under VISTA. A lotta list, eh? And I am
sure the advanced home users in this newsgroup are running older 64-bit
versions of windows.

"Results 1 - 10 of about 3,260,000 for software that works with xp but not
vista. (0.31 seconds) "

Eisboch * (hehehe)

=========================

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...s+with+xp+but+....

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...rs+not+availab....

~~snerk~~

Snerk yourself...that list is full of b.s.

"I had the same problem after installing Vista 32 bit. To get past it, I
had to uninstall the program then reinstall it. When I reinstalled, I
used the "Run as Administrator" to execute the .exe installation file."

Yeah, well, it ran...and it would have run if the original poster in
that thread had any understanding of what he was doing.

Unimpressed.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

In Vista's defense I asked the Mrs. how she liked her new "notebook"
loaded w/Vista, and she says she likes it very well. and she does a
lot more ( A WHOLE not more!) with it than post in rec.boats, and
various bass guitar forums.

?;^ )

HK wrote:
I'm still waiting for "Reggie" or one of other
computer idiot savants to provide me with a list of programs and
processes on my desktop machine that are running perceptibly "slower" on
VISTA than they would on their desktop machine running XP.

You haven't noticed Vista taking much longer to delete files?

Bertram Redneck wrote:
HK wrote:
I'm still waiting for "Reggie" or one of other computer idiot savants
to provide me with a list of programs and processes on my desktop
machine that are running perceptibly "slower" on VISTA than they would
on their desktop machine running XP.

You haven't noticed Vista taking much longer to delete files?


Nope. I don't delete that many "individual" files that the time involved
in doing so becomes an annoyance, and, typically, I use "Total
Commander" for file manipulation.

Tim wrote:
On Apr 7, 9:27 pm, HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:55:50 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
I'd like to see a recent list of contemporary application software that
worked under XP and does not work under VISTA. A lotta list, eh? And I am
sure the advanced home users in this newsgroup are running older 64-bit
versions of windows.
"Results 1 - 10 of about 3,260,000 for software that works with xp but not
vista. (0.31 seconds) "
Eisboch (hehehe)
=========================
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...s+with+xp+but+...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...rs+not+availab...
~~snerk~~
Snerk yourself...that list is full of b.s.

"I had the same problem after installing Vista 32 bit. To get past it, I
had to uninstall the program then reinstall it. When I reinstalled, I
used the "Run as Administrator" to execute the .exe installation file."

Yeah, well, it ran...and it would have run if the original poster in
that thread had any understanding of what he was doing.

Unimpressed.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

In Vista's defense I asked the Mrs. how she liked her new "notebook"
loaded w/Vista, and she says she likes it very well. and she does a
lot more ( A WHOLE not more!) with it than post in rec.boats, and
various bass guitar forums.

?;^ )


"Reggie," the chief VISTA antagonist here, knows less about computer
operating systems than I know about gynecology.

On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:46:35 -0400, HK wrote:


And I
am sure the advanced home users in this newsgroup are running older
64-bit versions of windows.

Well, not Windows, but I've been running a 64 bit Linux system for 3 or 4
years, now. ;-)

On Apr 8, 6:27*am, HK wrote:
Bertram Redneck wrote:
HK wrote:
I'm still waiting for "Reggie" or one of other computer idiot savants
to provide me with a list of programs and processes on my desktop
machine that are running perceptibly "slower" on VISTA than they would
on their desktop machine running XP.

You haven't noticed Vista taking much longer to delete files?

Nope. I don't delete that many "individual" files that the time involved
in doing so becomes an annoyance, and, typically, I use "Total
Commander" for file manipulation.

Now there's a hell of an OS if you need to use a third party program
to move files around.....