On Apr 6, 11:47*am, HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:





Eisboch wrote:

How about the average computer user who does not have advanced
computer skills or even the technical knowledge of what to buy?
My daughter recently replaced their computer with a new HP Pavilion
laptop preloaded with some version of Vista. *They bought the best
model they could afford, but she doesn't know a megabit from a horsefly..

I was playing with it the other day. *It just doesn't have the "snap"
opening programs or even simple navigation to files or folders that my
4 year old HP Pavilion running XP has. * I neglected to check what her
processor type, speed or RAM capacity is, so it may not be a fair
comparison. *Mine has a Pentium 4, 3.00GHz processor and 2.0 GB of
RAM. Next time I visit, I'll check and see what her new one has.

Point is, to us non-hobbyist or geeks, it seems that if Vista requires
certain minimums in terms of processors and RAM capacity to operate
properly, (which I am sure raises the cost of the computer) *Microsoft
is sorta screwing many customers by forcing Vista onto all new Windows
based computers.

I also may not know what I am talking about, because my daughter's
computer .... which is only a month old .... is my first experience
with Vista. * So, I am one of those "know-nothings" *who claims Vista
is slower than XP. * In this particular case, it *is* noticeably
slower than the 4 year old computer I am using now.

Eisboch

Eisboch,
I have helped two friends setup their Windows Vista desktops

Bull****. There hasn't been one post in this newsgroup that indicates
you know anything about computers or operating systems. All you have
ever done is cut and pasted negative news stories about VISTA.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry, you lie here constantly. Pretty presumptive of you to call
bull**** on someone you know nothing about.