John H. wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:18:33 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:04:29 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Apr 4, 4:34 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
messagenewsf6dnSowEcbZh2vanZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@comca st.com...





wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:48 am, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message
...
.
Will you please stop doing that Scott? The only time I see the spam
is
when
you reply to it.
I have backed off the group for a while here. you guys got much more
with your constant sniping, which is much more annoying than to worry
about than my dots.. if you can't handle a one line subject, with an
occassional dot, killfile me. I will not fight over this again, you
use NG to fight with folks, I will use it the way I want. Otherwise,
and I have explained it more than once, screw off..
Anyone who really is upset about your dots can easily set up a NG
filter
to delete any post that has SPAM in the subject.
Wow, now I have to set up an additional filter to not only filter out
the
china spam but the Scotty spam when all it takes is for Scotty to stop
replying to the stuff. His dot and 'spam' replies not only effect me but
every other member of this NG who filter out the china spam crap from
the
onset.

NP though............"spam" is now filtered.

Thanks Scott. You are a very considerate member who has earned a place
in
my kill file.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
If you used the one filter of SPAM from the subject line. everytime we
marked one, it would save you from making a new filter anyway... Just
got to take your head out of your ass long enough to see that...
A header with the subject 'spam' is easily skipped. I don't know what all
the fuss is about. Keep your serenity. It's a boon to your karma.
Why should I and everyone else who have the china spam people filtered. All
Scott has to do is stop replying to their posts.

Scott has been posting nothing but garbage here, including his beautiful
backyard dirt track. He is now in my KF so I don't have to worry about his
SPAM.



You're a great American!

Why do you find it necessary to announce to the world that you've KF'd
someone?

I'm just interested in the logic.

Harry does the same thing.

Why?

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:34:05 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
news
wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:48 am, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message

...

.
Will you please stop doing that Scott? The only time I see the spam is
when
you reply to it.

I have backed off the group for a while here. you guys got much more
with your constant sniping, which is much more annoying than to worry
about than my dots.. if you can't handle a one line subject, with an
occassional dot, killfile me. I will not fight over this again, you
use NG to fight with folks, I will use it the way I want. Otherwise,
and I have explained it more than once, screw off..

Anyone who really is upset about your dots can easily set up a NG filter
to delete any post that has SPAM in the subject.


Wow, now I have to set up an additional filter to not only filter out the
china spam but the Scotty spam when all it takes is for Scotty to stop
replying to the stuff. His dot and 'spam' replies not only effect me but
every other member of this NG who filter out the china spam crap from the
onset.

NP though............"spam" is now filtered.

Thanks Scott. You are a very considerate member who has earned a place in
my kill file.


Is an announcement necessary? Isn't it just the same as spam?

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:04:29 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Apr 4, 4:34*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in messagenewsf6dnSowEcbZh2vanZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@comca st.com...





wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:48 am, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message

...

.
Will you please stop doing that Scott? *The only time I see the spam is
when
you reply to it.

I have backed off the group for a while here. you guys got much more
with your constant sniping, which is much more annoying than to worry
about than my dots.. if you can't handle a one line subject, with an
occassional dot, killfile me. I will not fight over this again, you
use NG to fight with folks, I will use it the way I want. Otherwise,
and I have explained it more than once, screw off..

Anyone who really is upset about your dots can easily set up a NG filter
to delete any post that has SPAM in the subject.

Wow, now I have to set up an additional filter to not only filter out the
china spam but the Scotty spam when all it takes is for Scotty to stop
replying to the stuff. * His dot and 'spam' replies not only effect me but
every other member of this NG who filter out the china spam crap from the
onset.

NP though............"spam" is now filtered.

Thanks Scott. *You are a very considerate member who has earned a place in
my kill file.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you used the one filter of SPAM from the subject line. everytime we
marked one, it would save you from making a new filter anyway... Just
got to take your head out of your ass long enough to see that...

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:04:29 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Apr 4, 4:34*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in messagenewsf6dnSowEcbZh2vanZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@comca st.com...





wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:48 am, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message

...

.
Will you please stop doing that Scott? *The only time I see the spam is
when
you reply to it.

I have backed off the group for a while here. you guys got much more
with your constant sniping, which is much more annoying than to worry
about than my dots.. if you can't handle a one line subject, with an
occassional dot, killfile me. I will not fight over this again, you
use NG to fight with folks, I will use it the way I want. Otherwise,
and I have explained it more than once, screw off..

Anyone who really is upset about your dots can easily set up a NG filter
to delete any post that has SPAM in the subject.

Wow, now I have to set up an additional filter to not only filter out the
china spam but the Scotty spam when all it takes is for Scotty to stop
replying to the stuff. * His dot and 'spam' replies not only effect me but
every other member of this NG who filter out the china spam crap from the
onset.

NP though............"spam" is now filtered.

Thanks Scott. *You are a very considerate member who has earned a place in
my kill file.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you used the one filter of SPAM from the subject line. everytime we
marked one, it would save you from making a new filter anyway... Just
got to take your head out of your ass long enough to see that...

A header with the subject 'spam' is easily skipped. I don't know what all
the fuss is about. Keep your serenity. It's a boon to your karma.

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:18:33 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:04:29 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Apr 4, 4:34 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
messagenewsf6dnSowEcbZh2vanZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@comca st.com...





wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:48 am, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message

...

.
Will you please stop doing that Scott? The only time I see the spam
is
when
you reply to it.

I have backed off the group for a while here. you guys got much more
with your constant sniping, which is much more annoying than to worry
about than my dots.. if you can't handle a one line subject, with an
occassional dot, killfile me. I will not fight over this again, you
use NG to fight with folks, I will use it the way I want. Otherwise,
and I have explained it more than once, screw off..

Anyone who really is upset about your dots can easily set up a NG
filter
to delete any post that has SPAM in the subject.

Wow, now I have to set up an additional filter to not only filter out
the
china spam but the Scotty spam when all it takes is for Scotty to stop
replying to the stuff. His dot and 'spam' replies not only effect me but
every other member of this NG who filter out the china spam crap from
the
onset.

NP though............"spam" is now filtered.

Thanks Scott. You are a very considerate member who has earned a place
in
my kill file.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you used the one filter of SPAM from the subject line. everytime we
marked one, it would save you from making a new filter anyway... Just
got to take your head out of your ass long enough to see that...

A header with the subject 'spam' is easily skipped. I don't know what all
the fuss is about. Keep your serenity. It's a boon to your karma.

Why should I and everyone else who have the china spam people filtered. All
Scott has to do is stop replying to their posts.

Scott has been posting nothing but garbage here, including his beautiful
backyard dirt track. He is now in my KF so I don't have to worry about his
SPAM.



You're a great American!

Why do you find it necessary to announce to the world that you've KF'd
someone?

I'm just interested in the logic.

Harry does the same thing.

Why?

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:04:19 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:18:33 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


Scott has been posting nothing but garbage here, including his beautiful
backyard dirt track. He is now in my KF so I don't have to worry about
his
SPAM.


You're a great American!

Why do you find it necessary to announce to the world that you've KF'd
someone?

I'm just interested in the logic.

Harry does the same thing.

Why?
I can think of a half dozen or so members here who do the same
thing........yet you never questioned them when doing so.

Why?

Ummmm...........on second thought...........I already know the answer so
never mind.

Try to be consistent John. Try hard.


Why worry about consistency? You and Harry make a big deal of your
killfiles. You actually use it as a 'threat', as though someone would give
a rat's ass whether or not you killfiled them.

I just questioned your logic for the continuous announcements you and Harry
make. Is anyone else that way? I'll be glad to ask him/her. Give me an
example.


Didn't take Herring long to slide back into insult role, eh?

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:04:19 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:18:33 -0400, "JimH" wrote:



Scott has been posting nothing but garbage here, including his beautiful
backyard dirt track. He is now in my KF so I don't have to worry about
his
SPAM.



You're a great American!

Why do you find it necessary to announce to the world that you've KF'd
someone?

I'm just interested in the logic.

Harry does the same thing.

Why?

I can think of a half dozen or so members here who do the same
thing........yet you never questioned them when doing so.

Why?

Ummmm...........on second thought...........I already know the answer so
never mind.

Try to be consistent John. Try hard.


Why worry about consistency? You and Harry make a big deal of your
killfiles. You actually use it as a 'threat', as though someone would give
a rat's ass whether or not you killfiled them.

I just questioned your logic for the continuous announcements you and Harry
make. Is anyone else that way? I'll be glad to ask him/her. Give me an
example.

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:24:31 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:04:19 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:18:33 -0400, "JimH" wrote:



Scott has been posting nothing but garbage here, including his beautiful
backyard dirt track. He is now in my KF so I don't have to worry about
his
SPAM.



You're a great American!

Why do you find it necessary to announce to the world that you've KF'd
someone?

I'm just interested in the logic.

Harry does the same thing.

Why?

I can think of a half dozen or so members here who do the same
thing........yet you never questioned them when doing so.

Why?

Ummmm...........on second thought...........I already know the answer so
never mind.

Try to be consistent John. Try hard.


Why worry about consistency? You and Harry make a big deal of your
killfiles. You actually use it as a 'threat', as though someone would give
a rat's ass whether or not you killfiled them.

I just questioned your logic for the continuous announcements you and
Harry
make. Is anyone else that way? I'll be glad to ask him/her. Give me an
example.

This NG has been free of arguments and insults since you left on your Mickey
Mouse vacation.

Now that you came back................oh, never mind.


LOL! There were over 1100 posts in the group when I got back. Well over
half were as you described above.

I asked you a question. I made no insult. Why would you possibly take a
question as an insult?
--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)