|
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
I.R.A.Q Inevitable Replay of Asian Quagmire Viet Nam II. :-( This is dramatic and groundless. Every time an American soldier dies abroad someone chimes in calling it a quagmire. Wait and see what happens. No one knows how it will turn out, and that includes you. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Chris" wrote in message
... I.R.A.Q Inevitable Replay of Asian Quagmire Viet Nam II. :-( This is dramatic and groundless. Every time an American soldier dies abroad someone chimes in calling it a quagmire. Wait and see what happens. No one knows how it will turn out, and that includes you. While that may have been dramatic, at least South Vietnam had some underpinnings of and a modest desire for democracy. Iraq is a land of feudal warlords and fundamentalists who will rip and rend the country into territories and factions once they've been given their "freedom." This is like bailing against a tide, it's futile and a waste of precious resources -- resources America is very thin on these days. England attempted this little Iraq escapade in the early part of the 20th century with predictable results. History, in this case, is bound to repeat itself. You may want to wait for the outcome and we'll all have to, for many of us the writing is already on the wall. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
While that may have been dramatic, at least South Vietnam had some underpinnings of and a modest desire for democracy. Iraq is a land of feudal warlords and fundamentalists who will rip and rend the country into territories and factions once they've been given their "freedom." People are people, and all want to be free. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
This is dramatic and groundless. Every time an American soldier dies abroad
someone chimes in calling it a quagmire. Wait and see what happens. No one knows how it will turn out, and that includes you. Nobody has an "exit" strategy for Iraq, and that includes Bush. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
People are people, and all want to be free.
In acutality, "freedom" is a long way from the top of the food chain. If you have nowhere to live, nothing to eat, no medical care, and no hope "freedom" is a ridiculous luxury. Democracy works best in a country where basic needs have been met, the populace is at least moderately educated and literate, and without long traditions of internal warfare. People must be willing to compromise for the common good if Democracy is going to succeed. We now say it's our goal to establish a Democracy in Iraq. We'll need a lot of luck- less fertile ground has seldom been encountered. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Joe" wrote in message ...
While that may have been dramatic, at least South Vietnam had some underpinnings of and a modest desire for democracy. Iraq is a land of feudal warlords and fundamentalists who will rip and rend the country into territories and factions once they've been given their "freedom." People are people, and all want to be free. Yes, but not all people in the world want republican/christian repressiveness shoved down their throats. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
Is that what is bothering you, did a Christian knock on your door and try to
shove his politics and religion down your throat? I could not figure out why you had a chip on your shoulder, now I understand. "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Joe" wrote in message ... While that may have been dramatic, at least South Vietnam had some underpinnings of and a modest desire for democracy. Iraq is a land of feudal warlords and fundamentalists who will rip and rend the country into territories and factions once they've been given their "freedom." People are people, and all want to be free. Yes, but not all people in the world want republican/christian repressiveness shoved down their throats. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Read the paper much Chuck? The Bush administration has asked for the UN to get involved in the peace keeping efforts in Iraq, with most of the US troops withdrawn within 2 years. The effort will of course be thwarted by France and Germany. Must be a different paper than you read. I see where Bush's request for assistance is conditional: The UN must acknowledge that the US is the sole, supreme, and final decision maker on all matters having to do with Iraq and all troops will be under US, not UN command. Of course it is conditional. Why should we have the UN lead the effort? Based on the way they handled things before the war we would be crazy to have them in charge with this initiative. Funny, first you complain that there there is no plan. A plan is developed and you complain about *it*. There is no pleasing you Chuck. How could we possibly get out in two years if we have a coalition force to command? If our GI's take off their camo helmets and put on blue ones instead, are we suddenly "out of Iraq"? I never said the plan called for a full withdrawal of troops. I said most would be withdrawn. I guess you somehow missed that. Would that be the same France and Germany which told Bush "We will not join your invasion to search for weapons of mass destruction, we're not at all convinced these weapons exist and we prefer to persue the matter through the United Nations"? The same France and Germany which were insulted, publicly, by almost every right winger in the US-from the highest levels of the State Department to truck stop waitresses renaming French Fries on the menu? Yes, the same France and Germany who were selling weapons and goods to Iraq. That would be them Chuck. Every right winger? When are you going to stop with the generalizations? And why are you so bitter all the time? Odd. 90-days ago, the UN was "irrelevant." How quickly things can change. Nothing has changed. They remain irrelevant as far as decision making goes. But they are relevant in their ability to serve as a neutral entity to join the peace keeping forces as one. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 18:47:44 GMT, "Jim"
wrote: Of course it is conditional. Why should we have the UN lead the effort? Based on the way they handled things before the war we would be crazy to have them in charge with this initiative. It was the UN who mishandled things before the war? Some would disagree: WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A "brutally honest" report prepared for the U.S. military Joint Chiefs of Staff blames post-war unrest in Iraq on hurried, inadequate planning before the invasion, defense officials said on Wednesday. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Funny, first you complain that there there is no plan. A plan is developed and you complain about *it*. Hollerin' to the UN for help is not a "plan." How do you know? Have you read it? The same France and Germany which were insulted, publicly, by almost every right winger in the US- Every right winger? When are you going to stop with the generalizations? Soon as you develop an appreciation for the quantifier "almost"? Yes, you got me there. A brain fart. My mistake. Sorry. See, it is not too hard to admit when you are wrong, now is it Chuck? And why are you so bitter all the time? I'm not. You mistake dismay for bitterness. Subtle but important difference. No, I see it as being bitter, as I am sure many other readers do. Take a step back and see how you are coming across in many of your political posts....anger and bitterness. Odd. 90-days ago, the UN was "irrelevant." How quickly things can change. Nothing has changed. They remain irrelevant as far as decision making goes. But they are relevant in their ability to serve as a neutral entity to join the peace keeping forces as one. Got it. "Y'all cain't be trusted to water a hog and ya must come over here on our terms and acknowledge that the interests and policies of the US are superior to the interests and policies of the UN. Y'all get your ragged socialist asses over here and absorb some of this heah fire to protect the American troops, OK?" Yep. That is all the UN is good for now. To collect the troops. Got it? Where will the very short line of eager responders form? There are plenty of nations who will readily acknowledge what we have done to curb terrorism and step in to do their part, except of course for Germany and France. Iraq is the last holding ground for terrorists. It is not the citizens fighting against us now (the majority now appreciate our efforts), it is terrorists from around the world pouring into the country to take a last stand...if they lose this, they lost. This is their "Gunfight at the OK Corral". And they will lose. Trust me. And how about that economy Gould? All indicators show a rebound. The results should be positively fantastic by election time next year. Don't ya' just love it! |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
Iraq is the last holding ground for terrorists.
I only wish you were right. (I mean correct). Sadly, you are not. Saudi Arabia, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, etc etc etc. No, they are not all going to travel to Iraq to try and outgun the US military. No showdown at the OK Corral. You beat the US by slow attrition of personnel, resources, and morale and denying the US the support of the general population in an occupied country, not by trying to outgun the world's only remaining superpower. They know that if they wage war on our terms, they will lose. That is exactly why they will choose the time, the place, and the conditions of the encounters. Their only realistic hope is to be able to set the rules and not follow ours. (Somebody needs to tell certain parties in the mid East that the US "won" the war in Iraq. Many people claim it just entered a new phase.) This strategy defeated the US in Viet Nam. It defeated the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. And how about that economy Gould? All indicators show a rebound. The results should be positively fantastic by election time next year. Don't ya' just love it! Indeed. Nobody will be more pleased than I *if* the economy performs a "fantastic rebound" in the next 14 months. Stay tuned. Even the mismanagement of the Bush administration can screw up the economy only so much before some natural resiliency at least tries to kick in. :-) |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Iraq is the last holding ground for terrorists. I only wish you were right. (I mean correct). Sadly, you are not. Saudi Arabia, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, etc etc etc. No, they are not all going to travel to Iraq to try and outgun the US military. No showdown at the OK Corral. You beat the US by ... You beat the US through terrorist attacks that chip away at morale and turn the bleeding heart liberals against its own government. Sorry to see that you're cooperating. Perhaps you should be charged with sedition. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Iraq is the last holding ground for terrorists. I only wish you were right. (I mean correct). Sadly, you are not. Sorry you cannot see the forest from the trees. But your political slant is blinding you. Too bad. This is the fight for survival for the terrorists. If they lose here, they lose. They are digging in. And I just love the fact that they are coming to us in Iraq, facing our military, rather than attacking us here in the US. Learn to see the bigger picture Chuck. BTW: Glad to see you appreciate the economic rebound we are now seeing. Are you going to give thanks to GWB or was this the result of something Clinton put in place? ;-) |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
You beat the US through terrorist attacks that chip away at morale and turn
the bleeding heart liberals against its own government. Sorry to see that you're cooperating. Perhaps you should be charged with sedition. Sedition? Certainly not. Criticizing the Bush administration, its policies, or the effects of those policies isn't sedition, it's treason. At least according to Ann Coulter. You disagree with what portion of my observation about how a terrorist or guerilla organization wages war against a powerful, industrialized nation? Do you also believe that all the terrorists on the planet are now headed to Iraq to duke it out mano-a-mano with the US? |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
This is the fight for survival for the terrorists. If they lose here, they
lose. They are digging in. You are trying to apply conventional military logic to guerilla warriors and terrorists. No, they do not and will not behave like Custer at the Little Bighorn. (In spite of Condi Rice's ingenious "fly paper" analogy) BTW: Glad to see you appreciate the economic rebound we are now seeing. Are you going to give thanks to GWB or was this the result of something Clinton put in place? ;-) ????? For several years, we've had to listen to excuses about how the POTUS doesn't run the economy. Suddenly, when it looks as though it *might* begin to pick up.......(and we won't waste a lot of time with why the current signals may be misleading....the effects of one-time refund checks working thier way through the pipeline and a temporary uptick in consumer spending until the credit cards recently paid off with a re-fi are charged back up the brink again,etc.....).....suddenly if things go right Bush gets the credit? Not surprising. At all. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Jim" wrote in message news:lzx5b.259890$cF.82047@rwcrnsc53... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Iraq is the last holding ground for terrorists. I only wish you were right. (I mean correct). Sadly, you are not. Sorry you cannot see the forest from the trees. But your political slant is blinding you. Too bad. This is the fight for survival for the terrorists. If they lose here, they lose. They are digging in. And I just love the fact that they are coming to us in Iraq, facing our military, rather than attacking us here in the US. Learn to see the bigger picture Chuck. So if the causality figures approach 3000 Americans you will concede that this *was* a worthless adventure? Please remember that this occupation is not without cost: for the 130 or so dead, we have a *much* larger figures in citizens with missing limbs and messed up lives. I question the value gained for the huge cost paid. If it is not about the oil, what exactly are we gaining in Iraq? Enough of the people there (perhaps 10% of the populace) don't want us to succeed for the US to make much of a difference. Our swaggering bully stance certainly had not bought the USA a gain on the international stage. Some fear perhaps, but not respect. Of course, if we waste a much larger number of USA citizens, perhaps our actions will gain more meaning, just like they did in Vietnam. For bonus points, tell me again why we were in Vietnam? BTW: Glad to see you appreciate the economic rebound we are now seeing. Are you going to give thanks to GWB or was this the result of something Clinton put in place? ;-) Certainly you jest? We are borrowing prosperity from our offspring. At best, mis-guided and short sighted; at worst, the final, most telling act of greed of the "me" generation. Mark Browne |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"NOYB" wrote in message ... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Iraq is the last holding ground for terrorists. I only wish you were right. (I mean correct). Sadly, you are not. Saudi Arabia, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, etc etc etc. No, they are not all going to travel to Iraq to try and outgun the US military. No showdown at the OK Corral. You beat the US by ... You beat the US through terrorist attacks that chip away at morale and turn the bleeding heart liberals against its own government. Sorry to see that you're cooperating. Perhaps you should be charged with sedition. When it is against the law to say that the emperor has no clothes, our opponents will have won anyway! Mark Browne |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"bb" wrote in message ... On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 02:35:20 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: You beat the US through terrorist attacks that chip away at morale and turn the bleeding heart liberals against its own government. Some wars are necessary, and some are unjustified. If it weren't for said bleeding heart liberals the US would still be bogged down in Viet Nam. No we wouldn't. You're assuming that war was "unwinnable". I think that the half-hearted effort our government put forth just prolonged the war...and increased our casualty numbers. I don't know if you're old enough to know much about that conflict, but unfortunately, Iraq has more in common with Viet Nam than any other conflict. It has nothing in common. There is no Russia or China to help back the people causing the trouble. Saddam's army was soundly defeated, but there are terrorists there using leftover caches of explosives to inflict terror strikes. Nobody is supplying them with arms like they were the Vietcong. Not one attack has a strategic value. The terrorist control no land, no cities, and no supply line. Their sole purpose is to inflict enough casualties that American opinion starts to sway, and we leave with our tails between our legs. Sorry to see that you're cooperating. I'm glad to see he's patriotically exercising his right to dissent. You young people missed your chance to watch the nation go throught the trials of an unjust war. Lucky you, now's your chance. It might take you 20 or so years to understand, but most likely, some day you will. I see the war as a way to protect America and its economy. The Middle East is a mess. Unfortunately, our entire economy depends upon its oil. Removing Saddam and installing an American-friendly government protects the flow of oil so we don't have to put up with the Saudi's bull****. There has been ample evidence that Saddam's intelligence people had worked and have been working with many of the World's terror organizations. He provided safe haven for many of them...and would likely supply WMD's at his first opportunity. Hell, there's an article in Newsweek (I think) discussing how al Qaeda has biological weapons and has been working on a means to deliver them. You think the war was unjustified...and I think otherwise...and always will. Perhaps you should be charged with sedition. Not yet, but if Bush wins again in '04, Ashcroft may have his way. One can only hope. ;-) |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Iraq is the last holding ground for terrorists. I only wish you were right. (I mean correct). Sadly, you are not. Saudi Arabia, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, etc etc etc. No, they are not all going to travel to Iraq to try and outgun the US military. Where did I say *all*? Why do you continue to generalize? No showdown at the OK Corral. Sure it is. This is an important battle for the terrorists to win. It is the gunfight at the OK Corral. You beat the US by slow attrition of personnel, resources, and morale and denying the US the support of the general population in an occupied country, not by trying to outgun the world's only remaining superpower. That is what makes the fight in Iraq ideal for us. I would rather see the terrorists take on our military in Iraq than taking on the US citizens on US soil. They know that if they wage war on our terms, they will lose. Exactly how do you know that? Saddam thought he was invincible. That is exactly why they will choose the time, the place, and the conditions of the encounters. Their only realistic hope is to be able to set the rules and not follow ours. (Somebody needs to tell certain parties in the mid East that the US "won" the war in Iraq. Many people claim it just entered a new phase.) This strategy defeated the US in Viet Nam. It defeated the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Totally different wars and different circumstances. And how about that economy Gould? All indicators show a rebound. The results should be positively fantastic by election time next year. Don't ya' just love it! Indeed. Nobody will be more pleased than I *if* the economy performs a "fantastic rebound" in the next 14 months. Stay tuned. Even the mismanagement of the Bush administration can screw up the economy only so much before some natural resiliency at least tries to kick in. :-) Ahhh, so the recession was GWB's fault but the recovery has nothing to do with him. I would expect to hear that type of logic from you. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:7Ho5b.343345$Ho3.50583@sccrnsc03... Is that what is bothering you, did a Christian knock on your door and try to shove his politics and religion down your throat? I could not figure out why you had a chip on your shoulder, now I understand. And I'm sure that if Muslims invaded the US because we're a (unsubstantiated) threat to them, you'd accept Mohammed and Saddam National Construction as your saviors. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
jps,
No, I have thought about it, and I would not accept Mohammed or Saddam National Construction as my saviors. But I also would not accept any religion or construction company who happened to invade my country, so I guess I am an equal opportunity non saved person. What religion invaded your country and did they try to get you convert? "jps" wrote in message ... "Bill Cole" wrote in message news:7Ho5b.343345$Ho3.50583@sccrnsc03... Is that what is bothering you, did a Christian knock on your door and try to shove his politics and religion down your throat? I could not figure out why you had a chip on your shoulder, now I understand. And I'm sure that if Muslims invaded the US because we're a (unsubstantiated) threat to them, you'd accept Mohammed and Saddam National Construction as your saviors. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Chris" wrote in message
... I.R.A.Q Inevitable Replay of Asian Quagmire Viet Nam II. :-( This is dramatic and groundless. Every time an American soldier dies abroad someone chimes in calling it a quagmire. Wait and see what happens. No one knows how it will turn out, and that includes you. Wait and see? How long do YOU think we should wait? At what point in time will YOU PERSONALLY think something is seriously wrong? Your response should use English words commonly used to describe blocks of time, i.e.: days, months, years. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
Wait and see? How long do YOU think we should wait? At what point in time will YOU PERSONALLY think something is seriously wrong? Your response should use English words commonly used to describe blocks of time, i.e.: days, months, years. The turn around in Iraq in less than 5 months is remarkable by any historical standard. You're either too stupid to realize this, or you have decided to play partisan politics, ignore all the facts, and focus on only the negative. I don't think you're stupid, so I suppose its the latter. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Joe" wrote in message
... Wait and see? How long do YOU think we should wait? At what point in time will YOU PERSONALLY think something is seriously wrong? Your response should use English words commonly used to describe blocks of time, i.e.: days, months, years. The turn around in Iraq in less than 5 months is remarkable by any historical standard. You're either too stupid to realize this, or you have decided to play partisan politics, ignore all the facts, and focus on only the negative. I don't think you're stupid, so I suppose its the latter. Nope. Neither. Nookular Boy has surrounded himself with people so spooky that even the real spooks think they're spooky, and that's not good. This smacks of the Nixon days. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote in message ... Wait and see? How long do YOU think we should wait? At what point in time will YOU PERSONALLY think something is seriously wrong? Your response should use English words commonly used to describe blocks of time, i.e.: days, months, years. The turn around in Iraq in less than 5 months is remarkable by any historical standard. You're either too stupid to realize this, or you have decided to play partisan politics, ignore all the facts, and focus on only the negative. I don't think you're stupid, so I suppose its the latter. Nope. Neither. Nookular Boy has surrounded himself with people so spooky that even the real spooks think they're spooky, and that's not good. This smacks of the Nixon days. Way to back up your argument Dougy. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
Losing a verbal battle again, I see. That's when you start the school girlish name calling, JoeTechnician. Read again for content, Walt. I did not, and would not, call Doug stupid. You on the other hand........................... |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Joe" wrote in message . ..
Losing a verbal battle again, I see. That's when you start the school girlish name calling, JoeTechnician. Read again for content, Walt. I did not, and would not, call Doug stupid. You on the other hand........................... Thank you for proving my case!! |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Joe" wrote in message . .. Losing a verbal battle again, I see. That's when you start the school girlish name calling, JoeTechnician. Read again for content, Walt. I did not, and would not, call Doug stupid. You on the other hand........................... Thank you for proving my case!! That you're stupid? You're welcome, Walter. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Joe" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Joe" wrote in message . .. Losing a verbal battle again, I see. That's when you start the school girlish name calling, JoeTechnician. Read again for content, Walt. I did not, and would not, call Doug stupid. You on the other hand........................... Thank you for proving my case!! That you're stupid? You're welcome, Walter. So, are you ADMITTING that you are a school girl, JoeTechnician? Oh, I asked awhile back, and you never told me....How is it that you NOW say that you aren't an engineer, that you are a licensed contractor in Georgia, but previously you've stated that you are licensed in Georgia through reciprocity, when in fact, Georgia doesn't offer reciprocity for ANY type of contractor's license? |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
You're still on this topic JimDandy? Better get that OCD evaluated...
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Joe" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Joe" wrote in message . .. Losing a verbal battle again, I see. That's when you start the school girlish name calling, JoeTechnician. Read again for content, Walt. I did not, and would not, call Doug stupid. You on the other hand........................... Thank you for proving my case!! That you're stupid? You're welcome, Walter. So, are you ADMITTING that you are a school girl, JoeTechnician? Oh, I asked awhile back, and you never told me....How is it that you NOW say that you aren't an engineer, that you are a licensed contractor in Georgia, but previously you've stated that you are licensed in Georgia through reciprocity, when in fact, Georgia doesn't offer reciprocity for ANY type of contractor's license? |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
So, are you ADMITTING that you are a school girl, JoeTechnician? Oh, I asked awhile back, and you never told me....How is it that you NOW say that you aren't an engineer, that you are a licensed contractor in Georgia, but previously you've stated that you are licensed in Georgia through reciprocity, when in fact, Georgia doesn't offer reciprocity for ANY type of contractor's license? If you would show even an ounce of comprehension I would explain it yet again. Since you can't, and no one else cares, I wont. Get some help Mr. (non P.E.) Kevin Noble from Snellville, GA |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"Joe" wrote in message ...
So, are you ADMITTING that you are a school girl, JoeTechnician? Oh, I asked awhile back, and you never told me....How is it that you NOW say that you aren't an engineer, that you are a licensed contractor in Georgia, but previously you've stated that you are licensed in Georgia through reciprocity, when in fact, Georgia doesn't offer reciprocity for ANY type of contractor's license? If you would show even an ounce of comprehension I would explain it yet again. Since you can't, and no one else cares, I wont. Get some help Mr. (non P.E.) Kevin Noble from Snellville, GA Man, you are VERY obsessed with me, I don't know whether to be flattered or not. By the way, I don't live anywhere CLOSE to Snellville, GA. Now, please tell how you have obtained reciprocity in GA. Again, the state of Georgia does NOT OFFER reciprocity for contractor's licenses. You are nothing but a liar, JoeTechnican. Go pull some cable, before your boss yells at you.......again. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
"NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net...
You're still on this topic JimDandy? Better get that OCD evaluated... And you're still obsessed with me? For a person in a medical field, you sure appear stupid here. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
Turnaround? You call this a turnaround? This looks good, what's
happening in Iraq? Where do you get your news from? Bush has got to go. He's even worse than Reagan. |
US occupation of Iraq unsustainable over long run, Congress warns
By the way, I don't live anywhere CLOSE to
Snellville, GA. You're full of **** as usual. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com