peek inside Iran
 

Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the 'ell
out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

peek inside Iran
 

On Mar 29, 2:13*pm, "Don White" wrote:
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the 'ell
out of it.http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Don, I clicked the link provided, and it takes you to a home page but
noting of any "photo galleries"

that is, unless I'm missing something.......

peek inside Iran
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the 'ell
out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.

peek inside Iran
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Mar 29, 2:13 pm, "Don White" wrote:
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the 'ell
out of it.http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Don, I clicked the link provided, and it takes you to a home page but
noting of any "photo galleries"

that is, unless I'm missing something.......


============


Give it a minute. It's a video.

peek inside Iran
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.



The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game to
himself.

peek inside Iran
 

On Mar 29, 3:03*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Mar 29, 2:13 pm, "Don White" wrote:

Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the 'ell
out of it.http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Don, I clicked the link provided, and it takes you to a home page but
noting of any "photo galleries"

that is, unless I'm missing something.......

============

Give it a minute. It's a video.

OK, when I checked it out this morning, I was on dial-up

peek inside Iran
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.

The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game to
himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they will
fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since the dawn
of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change their culture.
Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims.
(Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to
drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward stays
at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the
brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are less victims
than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.

peek inside Iran
 

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:44:31 GMT, "Canuck57"
wrote:


Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.


Why is it taking the FBI so long to capture the ten most wanted?


There's just no end to the rationalizations Bush-shippers will provide
for the failures of their Great Leader.

peek inside Iran
 

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:44:31 GMT, "Canuck57"
wrote:


Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.


Why is it taking the FBI so long to capture the ten most wanted?
--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)

peek inside Iran
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:PUEHj.7061$rd2.5592@pd7urf3no...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.

The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game
to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they
will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since the
dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change their
culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing
other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have
a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward
stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the
son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning
over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them
in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is
it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.



Why Saddam? He had nothing to do with 9/11? Why not concentrate on the
correct country instead? Can you name that country?

peek inside Iran
 

On Mar 29, 10:26*pm, Tim wrote:
On Mar 29, 3:03*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Mar 29, 2:13 pm, "Don White" wrote:

Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the 'ell
out of it.http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Don, I clicked the link provided, and it takes you to a home page but
noting of any "photo galleries"

that is, unless I'm missing something.......

============

Give it a minute. It's a video.

OK, when I checked it out this morning, I was on dial-up- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dial up? What's THAT?!!

peek inside Iran
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Mar 29, 3:03 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Mar 29, 2:13 pm, "Don White" wrote:

Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell
out of it.http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Don, I clicked the link provided, and it takes you to a home page but
noting of any "photo galleries"

that is, unless I'm missing something.......

============

Give it a minute. It's a video.

OK, when I checked it out this morning, I was on dial-up

Dial-up?? Good grief...people still do that? ;-)

peek inside Iran
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
Why Saddam? He had nothing to do with 9/11? Why not concentrate on the
correct country instead? Can you name that country?


Yeah but..isn't that country run by Bushs' buddies...or BFF as the teeny
boppers would say.
I get a kick of that picture of George skipping along holding the kings
hand.

peek inside Iran
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Yeah but..isn't that country run by Bushs' buddies...or BFF as the teeny
boppers would say.
I get a *kick of that picture* of George skipping along holding the kings
hand.

should be..*kick out of that picture*

peek inside Iran
 

Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game to
himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they will
fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since the dawn
of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change their culture.
Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims.
(Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to
drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward stays
at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the
brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are less victims
than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.


Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

peek inside Iran
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game
to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they
will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since
the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change
their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy
killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India
will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward
stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the
son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning
over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them
in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why
is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.


"still are people"

Not a slam, but an illustration of how pervasive a thing like Bush can be.
And I do mean "thing".

peek inside Iran
 

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:18:48 -0700, Jim wrote:



Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

Being wrong probably makes you feel good, so I won't argue your points.
--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)

peek inside Iran
 

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:18:48 -0700, Jim wrote:


Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

Being wrong probably makes you feel good, so I won't argue your points.


Go ahead and argue. I thought he was a bad choice and I still do.
there are some out there who do not yet realize their mistake.

It's getting clear that our society is too fat, lazy and stupid to make
a good choice.

peek inside Iran
 

Jim wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:18:48 -0700, Jim wrote:


Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

Being wrong probably makes you feel good, so I won't argue your points.


Go ahead and argue. I thought he was a bad choice and I still do. there
are some out there who do not yet realize their mistake.

It's getting clear that our society is too fat, lazy and stupid to make
a good choice.


Herring's "knowledge base" consists of what he sucks down from
reich-wing radio and his hatred of people of color.

peek inside Iran
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game
to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they
will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since
the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change
their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy
killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India
will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward
stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the
son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning
over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them
in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why
is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know, I
did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even considering a
Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.

If Bush didn't kick some ass over 9/11, he would be roasted. For starting
Vietnam II, he is roasted. Roasted he is, a lame duck end of term
president. I have more respect for him than Bill Clinton. What was her
name, Monica?

There is too much crap in politics, need to find people who pump American
blood before corruption and the favours they owe.

peek inside Iran
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral
in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that
game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they
will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since
the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change
their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy
killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India
will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward
stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the
son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning
over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush,
why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know, I
did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even considering a
Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he massacred
the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint and elected
him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

peek inside Iran
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral
in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there,
they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way
since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to
change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite
happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan
and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives,
tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the
coward stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The
wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture.
There are less victims than there are villains. I don't see the
Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know, I
did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even considering a
Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he massacred
the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint and elected
him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?

peek inside Iran
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology
is already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state
funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there,
they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way
since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to
change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite
happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan
and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives,
tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the
coward stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The
wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that
culture. There are less victims than there are villains. I don't see
the Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know,
I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he massacred
the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint and
elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a written
script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've heard what
he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's carefully
planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals doesn't make him
cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough money
in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he writes the
way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale. Lesser colleges
may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

peek inside Iran
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology
is already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state
funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live
there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been
this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not
going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims
are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe
Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them
out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and
wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad
while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this
is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of
that culture. There are less victims than there are villains. I
don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the
terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know,
I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint
and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a written
script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've heard what
he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's carefully
planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals doesn't make him
cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough money
in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he writes
the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale. Lesser
colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not, it
would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great orator
and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter and jelly
sandwiches.

peek inside Iran
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive
and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology
is already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state
funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live
there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been
this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not
going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims
are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows,
maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's
into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there are
villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban
and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a written
script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've heard
what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's carefully
planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals doesn't make him
cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not, it
would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter and
jelly sandwiches.


I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.

peek inside Iran
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought
he had that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live
there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been
this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are
not going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone,
Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who
knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag the
Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there
are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And
for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've
heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's
carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals
doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not,
it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter and
jelly sandwiches.


I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.

What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?

peek inside Iran
 

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought
he had that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can
change that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people
live there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at
least been this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the
west are not going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them
alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran).
Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag
the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there
are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out.
And for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on
his ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no
problem with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've
heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's
carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals
doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not,
it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter
and jelly sandwiches.


I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.

What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?


I thought you were suggesting that he may be brilliant, but his public
speaking is a separate skill that's indicative of nothing.

peek inside Iran
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought
he had that game to himself.
Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can
change that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people
live there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at
least been this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the
west are not going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them
alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran).
Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag
the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there
are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out.
And for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.
I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on
his ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no
problem with that.
9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.

Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1
Your point regarding the URL is?

Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've
heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's
carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals
doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.
I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not,
it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter
and jelly sandwiches.

I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.
What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?


I thought you were suggesting that he may be brilliant, but his public
speaking is a separate skill that's indicative of nothing.




Politics and possible brain damage aside, it will be nice to have
someone in the White House next year who is able to *speak* the mother
tongue, eh? :)

peek inside Iran
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He
thought he had that game to himself.
Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can
change that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the
people live there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have
in at least been this way since the dawn of recorded history.
We in the west are not going to change their culture. Heck, it
we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other
Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will
have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his
mistake is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't
win. Being more civilized can't do what it takes. That is,
whole scale wipe them out. After all, the Taliban go home to
their supportive kids and wives, tutor another child to wrap a
bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward stays at home. We
in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the
brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims
turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out.
And for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.
I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are
even considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories
deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on
his ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no
problem with that.
9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really
a Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.

Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1
Your point regarding the URL is?

Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know
you've heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some
says it's carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair
plurals doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if
he writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through
Yale. Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not
Yale.
I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or
not, it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter
and jelly sandwiches.

I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.
What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?


I thought you were suggesting that he may be brilliant, but his public
speaking is a separate skill that's indicative of nothing.


Politics and possible brain damage aside, it will be nice to have someone
in the White House next year who is able to *speak* the mother tongue, eh?
:)
Hopefully not a forked tongue. ;)