Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 5:11*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
On-topic, since the price and availability of fuel affects boating. I've been reading about alternative energy sources lately, including solar, wind, geothermal, etc. *All have levels of promise but none will come close to satisfying energy needs in the short or long term. Meanwhile, the US has the world's largest supply of coal in various forms. Coal can be processed into oil. *It's called "synthetic oil" because it's not liquid in it's natural state but when processed, it is virtually indistinguishable from high grade oil. Estimates vary, but it is believed that there is at least an 80 year supply of oil obtainable from coal if it supplied all of our energy needs at current rates. *It would last much longer when supplemented by conventional oil reserves, solar and wind energy. The process to convert coal to oil becomes economically justified when regular oil prices exceed $35 per barrel. China is busy building several coal to oil conversion plants. Why isn't this technology and resource being tapped into in the US? Eisboch Last time I heard that China has stopped their coal-to-oil projects -- probably has to do with this method is not efficient and has a lot of downsides or something like that. US may try planting sugar canes in wetland in Southern part of US to convert sugar into ethanol. This will generate more energy than using corns, and is supposed to be green-house-gas neutral. Of course, this will have a large environmental impact. Jay Chan |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 12:34*pm, "
wrote: On Mar 18, 5:11*am, "Eisboch" wrote: On-topic, since the price and availability of fuel affects boating. I've been reading about alternative energy sources lately, including solar, wind, geothermal, etc. *All have levels of promise but none will come close to satisfying energy needs in the short or long term. Meanwhile, the US has the world's largest supply of coal in various forms. Coal can be processed into oil. *It's called "synthetic oil" because it's not liquid in it's natural state but when processed, it is virtually indistinguishable from high grade oil. Estimates vary, but it is believed that there is at least an 80 year supply of oil obtainable from coal if it supplied all of our energy needs at current rates. *It would last much longer when supplemented by conventional oil reserves, solar and wind energy. The process to convert coal to oil becomes economically justified when regular oil prices exceed $35 per barrel. China is busy building several coal to oil conversion plants. Why isn't this technology and resource being tapped into in the US? Eisboch Last time I heard that China has stopped their coal-to-oil projects -- probably has to do with this method is not efficient and has a lot of downsides or something like that. US may try planting sugar canes in wetland in Southern part of US to convert sugar into ethanol. *This will generate more energy than using corns, and is supposed to be green-house-gas neutral. *Of course, this will have a large environmental impact. Jay Chan- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The sugar cane industry in south Florida almost wiped out the Everglades as we know it. If not for a smart few, the farming practices would have completely ruined one of the most diverse and ecologically important areas on earth. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tug - DUTY towing empty coal barge 3-07e.jpg | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Coal tar for bottom of steel hull? | Boat Building | |||
Coal tar for bottom of steel hull? | Cruising | |||
Coal tar for bottom of steel hull? | General | |||
A lump of coal for Bush | General |