Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Mar 13, 9:34 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message m... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant ![]() Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah salty, guess I am just ignorant, as is my wife, and my dad, and the list goes on.... Or how do you psudo-intellectuals put it, "uninformed"? I guess I should know all the political affiliation of all the governors around here as being from New York, he must be a dem, that goes without saying.. oh wait, can you say Bloomberg? ====================== Here's another way to look at it: Why do you think his party affiliation even matters, compared to all the other facts surrounding the story? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Art of Self Deception | ASA | |||
Useless propeller | ASA | |||
UTTERLY USELESS | ASA |