| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 9:34 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah salty, guess I am just ignorant, as is my wife, and my dad, and the list goes on.... Or how do you psudo-intellectuals put it, "uninformed"? I guess I should know all the political affiliation of all the governors around here as being from New York, he must be a dem, that goes without saying.. oh wait, can you say Bloomberg? ====================== Here's another way to look at it: Why do you think his party affiliation even matters, compared to all the other facts surrounding the story? It is used at every oppourtunity when describing a Republican who has gone afoul of rules, laws and ethics. But, it is somehow not deemed important when a Deomcrat runs afould of rules, laws or ethics. Not true. You're generalizing based on what you want to believe. You are stating an opinion not a fact. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
"BAR" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 9:34 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah salty, guess I am just ignorant, as is my wife, and my dad, and the list goes on.... Or how do you psudo-intellectuals put it, "uninformed"? I guess I should know all the political affiliation of all the governors around here as being from New York, he must be a dem, that goes without saying.. oh wait, can you say Bloomberg? ====================== Here's another way to look at it: Why do you think his party affiliation even matters, compared to all the other facts surrounding the story? It is used at every oppourtunity when describing a Republican who has gone afoul of rules, laws and ethics. But, it is somehow not deemed important when a Deomcrat runs afould of rules, laws or ethics. Not true. You're generalizing based on what you want to believe. You are stating an opinion not a fact. Maybe. Show me some examples. The only way to be sure is to look at how & where the words are being used in specific articles. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used? Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the last name only is used unless it would cause confusion. AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because that DOES help tell the story. How does getting arrested for tapping your toes while taking a crap in an airport bathroom warrant having your political party affiliation mentioned two or three times in each paragraph when the story is reported? Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. I now believe the more a politician or minister protests against gays and gay rights, the more likely that person is either a gay still in the closet or a child molester. :) Sounds like you have some experience in those areas. Yeah, I read a lot. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. I now believe the more a politician or minister protests against gays and gay rights, the more likely that person is either a gay still in the closet or a child molester. :) Sounds like you have some experience in those areas. Yeah, I read a lot. No comment about Spitzer's unethical behavior as governor? Telling. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Mar 13, 1:29*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 1:09*pm, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:53:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 12:44*pm, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message news:ZM6dnQQBGJp4v0TanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast. com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period... stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used? Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the last name only is used unless it would cause confusion. AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because that DOES help tell the story.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Then why did the Chicago paper and ABC news only mention "GOP" and "Republican" in their stories.. Was that in line with your "rules" or was it to confuse the readers who are not as informed as to what party Spitzer belongs to? I have no idea hat you are jabbering about. If someone identified Spitzer as a Republican, then they simply screwed up. At one of the newspapers I used to run, we frequently got letters from a very elderly former school teacher who would send us corrections of all the typos she found in our classifieds. I've also seen editing notes end up running in the paper. Lets not overlook the famous "Dewey Wins" and "Perot Wins" headlines! One of my favorite bloopers of all time was at one of my papers. It was a Headline that said: "POPULAR LOCAL COUPLE ASSUMES MISSIONARY POSITION" Yeah, we got a few letters on that one!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, links were posted yesterday. The only mention of party in the Chicago paper was the headline which read "GOP demands Spitzer resign" and the ABC news identified a "Republican" legislator who commented on the issue.. Well, GOP D-I-D call for Spitzer's ouster. That was what THAT story was about. No it was not about that, that is just untrue. I really can't continue with you with your deflections and name calling, I don't really expect a coherant answer here either.. I am going outside to play with the gardens.. What name calling? What deflections? Saying I was ignorant or whatever cause I am from CT and did not know his partys affiliation. I have given reasoned responses to those who asked reasonable questions. Another slight, I guess my questions are not clear enough for you, that is just another deflection.. You just can't do this.. You just fly off the handle and start throwing things. I can't be responsible for your personal shortcomings Hummmm........... when it comes to discussing something where you already have your mind made up and securely locked. Nope, I have an opinion, and no one here has the integerity to honestly oppose it, Can you say, elitist;) Later salty |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
wrote in message
... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:33:27 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used? Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the last name only is used unless it would cause confusion. AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because that DOES help tell the story. How does getting arrested for tapping your toes while taking a crap in an airport bathroom warrant having your political party affiliation mentioned two or three times in each paragraph when the story is reported? Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. Yes, and MUCH has been made of that in the media. In the news biz, that's called a HOOK or an angle. It's a huge element of the story. Many people are more incensed about the hypocrisy involved than simply what he did. I am one of those people. Right. Like this chart, which doesn't just point out gay behavior, since that's becoming an accepted thing. It points out the hypocrisy of the people involved. http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1205430117 |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Mar 13, 1:41*pm, BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. I now believe the more a politician or minister protests against gays and gay rights, the more likely that person is either a gay still in the closet or a child molester. *:) Sounds like you have some experience in those areas. Yeah, I read a lot. No comment about Spitzer's unethical behavior as governor? Telling.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Forget it Bar, I think we are just fighting with more of Harrys sock puppets. Might as well not waste your time. The guy almost had me believing he was from CT;) |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. I now believe the more a politician or minister protests against gays and gay rights, the more likely that person is either a gay still in the closet or a child molester. :) Sounds like you have some experience in those areas. Yeah, I read a lot. No comment about Spitzer's unethical behavior as governor? Telling. Was Spitzer unethical in the discharge of his gubernatorial duties? He certainly has ethical issues in his personal behavior. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
wrote in message
... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:42:42 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:33:27 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used? Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the last name only is used unless it would cause confusion. AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because that DOES help tell the story. How does getting arrested for tapping your toes while taking a crap in an airport bathroom warrant having your political party affiliation mentioned two or three times in each paragraph when the story is reported? Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. Yes, and MUCH has been made of that in the media. In the news biz, that's called a HOOK or an angle. It's a huge element of the story. Many people are more incensed about the hypocrisy involved than simply what he did. I am one of those people. Right. Like this chart, which doesn't just point out gay behavior, since that's becoming an accepted thing. It points out the hypocrisy of the people involved. http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1205430117 You are pretty weird sometimes, Kanter. Have you seen a better one page summary of (as the magazine called it) "Hot Republican Gay Sex"? :-) |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Mar 13, 1:49*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:43:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 1:41*pm, BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. I now believe the more a politician or minister protests against gays and gay rights, the more likely that person is either a gay still in the closet or a child molester. *:) Sounds like you have some experience in those areas. Yeah, I read a lot. No comment about Spitzer's unethical behavior as governor? Telling.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Forget it Bar, I think we are just fighting with more of Harrys sock puppets. Might as well not waste your time. The guy almost had me believing he was from CT;) If by "The Guy" you are referring to me, I am from Connecticut. I was born in Norwalk Hospital, and now live in a suburb of Hartford. Wow, then you must know about Harry's fathers marina, right? The one that Harry sold off all of the contents for millions thereby creating a flood of inventory so big that other facilities came close to or did go out of business? |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:49:57 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:43:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 1:41 pm, BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. I now believe the more a politician or minister protests against gays and gay rights, the more likely that person is either a gay still in the closet or a child molester. :) Sounds like you have some experience in those areas. Yeah, I read a lot. No comment about Spitzer's unethical behavior as governor? Telling.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Forget it Bar, I think we are just fighting with more of Harrys sock puppets. Might as well not waste your time. The guy almost had me believing he was from CT;) If by "The Guy" you are referring to me, I am from Connecticut. I was born in Norwalk Hospital, and now live in a suburb of Hartford. I have to ask if you meant me, because I haven't seen anybody else in this thread mentioning that they live in Connecticut, and nothing in the above text was written by me. Bar was responding to HK. I have my newsreader filter set to mark his posts "read". I normally only read what he posts if they appear to be part of a thread I am particpating in. Even then, I often skip over them, as I knmow what they say without reading them. He's pretty consistent. I mostly ignore them. In the above, I am referring to ignoring HK, not BAR. I just read what I posted, and it didn't make that exactly clear! snerk What else is new. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
wrote in message
... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:56:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:42:42 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message m... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:33:27 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used? Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the last name only is used unless it would cause confusion. AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because that DOES help tell the story. How does getting arrested for tapping your toes while taking a crap in an airport bathroom warrant having your political party affiliation mentioned two or three times in each paragraph when the story is reported? Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. Yes, and MUCH has been made of that in the media. In the news biz, that's called a HOOK or an angle. It's a huge element of the story. Many people are more incensed about the hypocrisy involved than simply what he did. I am one of those people. Right. Like this chart, which doesn't just point out gay behavior, since that's becoming an accepted thing. It points out the hypocrisy of the people involved. http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1205430117 You are pretty weird sometimes, Kanter. Have you seen a better one page summary of (as the magazine called it) "Hot Republican Gay Sex"? :-) Certainly not something I would scan and save, and the sample size is minuscule, so it doesn't mean much anyway. If the title was as you state, then it's yellow journalism and pandering to a particular demographic. You apparently match that target group. As I said, sometimes you are a little weird. This is one of those times. It serves a purpose: Dealing with the faithful who pretend they've never heard of these bathroom queens before, and insist on "a cite". That usually shuts them up. It's fun. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
wrote in message
... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:12:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Right. Like this chart, which doesn't just point out gay behavior, since that's becoming an accepted thing. It points out the hypocrisy of the people involved. http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1205430117 You are pretty weird sometimes, Kanter. Have you seen a better one page summary of (as the magazine called it) "Hot Republican Gay Sex"? :-) Certainly not something I would scan and save, and the sample size is minuscule, so it doesn't mean much anyway. If the title was as you state, then it's yellow journalism and pandering to a particular demographic. You apparently match that target group. As I said, sometimes you are a little weird. This is one of those times. It serves a purpose: Dealing with the faithful who pretend they've never heard of these bathroom queens before, and insist on "a cite". That usually shuts them up. It's fun. Sorry, Doug. You seem like just another type of pervert with thisline of argument. Why? I'm too busy to go finding links for twits who never read the news. This is perfect. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:56:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:42:42 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:33:27 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used? Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the last name only is used unless it would cause confusion. AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because that DOES help tell the story. How does getting arrested for tapping your toes while taking a crap in an airport bathroom warrant having your political party affiliation mentioned two or three times in each paragraph when the story is reported? Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. Yes, and MUCH has been made of that in the media. In the news biz, that's called a HOOK or an angle. It's a huge element of the story. Many people are more incensed about the hypocrisy involved than simply what he did. I am one of those people. Right. Like this chart, which doesn't just point out gay behavior, since that's becoming an accepted thing. It points out the hypocrisy of the people involved. http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1205430117 You are pretty weird sometimes, Kanter. Have you seen a better one page summary of (as the magazine called it) "Hot Republican Gay Sex"? :-) Certainly not something I would scan and save, and the sample size is minuscule, so it doesn't mean much anyway. If the title was as you state, then it's yellow journalism and pandering to a particular demographic. You apparently match that target group. As I said, sometimes you are a little weird. This is one of those times. I believe that JSB (aka Dougie Kanter) is interested in Gay Republican Sex. He talks about it every chance he gets. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
"BAR" wrote in message
... wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:56:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:42:42 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:33:27 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used? Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the last name only is used unless it would cause confusion. AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because that DOES help tell the story. How does getting arrested for tapping your toes while taking a crap in an airport bathroom warrant having your political party affiliation mentioned two or three times in each paragraph when the story is reported? Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. Yes, and MUCH has been made of that in the media. In the news biz, that's called a HOOK or an angle. It's a huge element of the story. Many people are more incensed about the hypocrisy involved than simply what he did. I am one of those people. Right. Like this chart, which doesn't just point out gay behavior, since that's becoming an accepted thing. It points out the hypocrisy of the people involved. http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1205430117 You are pretty weird sometimes, Kanter. Have you seen a better one page summary of (as the magazine called it) "Hot Republican Gay Sex"? :-) Certainly not something I would scan and save, and the sample size is minuscule, so it doesn't mean much anyway. If the title was as you state, then it's yellow journalism and pandering to a particular demographic. You apparently match that target group. As I said, sometimes you are a little weird. This is one of those times. I believe that JSB (aka Dougie Kanter) is interested in Gay Republican Sex. He talks about it every chance he gets. Just making sure you never forget these things, when you and others start whining about ethics this & ethics that blah blah blah. Gotta maintain the balance, Blurt. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT),
wrote: You guys need to et a life. Seriously. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You guys need to et a life. Seriously. I will pay you to take him fishing. Please. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Mar 13, 3:05*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:ojuit35p1ostl17aupomn4mdjb33bs4jkb@4ax .com... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You guys need to et a life. Seriously. I will pay you to take him fishing. Please. I have been pretty much bedridden for almost two months, what's your excuse? |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
"hk" wrote in message . .. BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Because it is the *Republican Party* that has positioned itself as the party of *family values* (whatever the hell that is), and that party that is against gay right, and because Senator Craig was in the forefront of the GOP battle against gays. Spitzer got elected based upon his desire to root out corruption and run and ethical administration. Let's be fair. I now believe the more a politician or minister protests against gays and gay rights, the more likely that person is either a gay still in the closet or a child molester. :) Sounds like you have some experience in those areas. Yeah, I read a lot. No comment about Spitzer's unethical behavior as governor? Telling. Was Spitzer unethical in the discharge of his gubernatorial duties? He certainly has ethical issues in his personal behavior. If you're a creep you're a creep. There is no distinction between business and pleasure in that regard. Harry has a hard time grasping that concept. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
|
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
|
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
|
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:49:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: wrote in message ... Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... What's the name of your local paper? Could it be one of the Gannet-owned fish wrappers like we have here? And, are there any clues at the beginning or end of the article, like the words "Associated Press"? So what? Geraldine Ferraro's comment about Obama remains a fact! -- John |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
|
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
"BAR" wrote in message
... wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0500, John H. wrote: It is the ignorant who make up the Democrat party's base. Have you not come to that understanding yet? Democrats don't want the 'No Child Left Behind Act' to work because the thought of an educated population drives them up a wall. I really have no response for this, except to say that you seriously need a checkup from the neckup. You are not rational. Are you a proponent of outcome based educaiton? In my county, where my daughters attend public school, the have change a failing grade from an F for failure to E which to me means failure but we don't want to hurt the feelings of those who are failing. Failure is not a bad thing. You learn the most when you fail. John changed the subject because he is drunk. Don't follow him down that path. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0500, John H. wrote: It is the ignorant who make up the Democrat party's base. Have you not come to that understanding yet? Democrats don't want the 'No Child Left Behind Act' to work because the thought of an educated population drives them up a wall. I really have no response for this, except to say that you seriously need a checkup from the neckup. You are not rational. Are you a proponent of outcome based educaiton? In my county, where my daughters attend public school, the have change a failing grade from an F for failure to E which to me means failure but we don't want to hurt the feelings of those who are failing. Failure is not a bad thing. You learn the most when you fail. John changed the subject because he is drunk. Don't follow him down that path. I would readily follow John H. But you, I wouldn't even waste any time considering following. I hate going in circles. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
"BAR" wrote in message
. .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0500, John H. wrote: It is the ignorant who make up the Democrat party's base. Have you not come to that understanding yet? Democrats don't want the 'No Child Left Behind Act' to work because the thought of an educated population drives them up a wall. I really have no response for this, except to say that you seriously need a checkup from the neckup. You are not rational. Are you a proponent of outcome based educaiton? In my county, where my daughters attend public school, the have change a failing grade from an F for failure to E which to me means failure but we don't want to hurt the feelings of those who are failing. Failure is not a bad thing. You learn the most when you fail. John changed the subject because he is drunk. Don't follow him down that path. I would readily follow John H. But you, I wouldn't even waste any time considering following. I hate going in circles. Before this branch of the thread gets too cluttered, go back 2-3 messages and see how he completely lost track of what was happening. Even better, here's how it happened. He latched onto the word "ignorant", and turned it into something completely different. Don't feed it. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. It is the ignorant who make up the Democrat party's base. Have you not come to that understanding yet? Democrats don't want the 'No Child Left Behind Act' to work because the thought of an educated population drives them up a wall. -- John |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
BAR wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0500, John H. wrote: It is the ignorant who make up the Democrat party's base. Have you not come to that understanding yet? Democrats don't want the 'No Child Left Behind Act' to work because the thought of an educated population drives them up a wall. I really have no response for this, except to say that you seriously need a checkup from the neckup. You are not rational. Are you a proponent of outcome based educaiton? In my county, where my daughters attend public school, the have change a failing grade from an F for failure to E which to me means failure but we don't want to hurt the feelings of those who are failing. Failure is not a bad thing. You learn the most when you fail. John changed the subject because he is drunk. Don't follow him down that path. I would readily follow John H. But you, I wouldn't even waste any time considering following. I hate going in circles. Follow John H. where? Into the john? |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:54:09 -0400, BAR wrote: wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0500, John H. wrote: It is the ignorant who make up the Democrat party's base. Have you not come to that understanding yet? Democrats don't want the 'No Child Left Behind Act' to work because the thought of an educated population drives them up a wall. I really have no response for this, except to say that you seriously need a checkup from the neckup. You are not rational. Are you a proponent of outcome based educaiton? In my county, where my daughters attend public school, the have change a failing grade from an F for failure to E which to me means failure but we don't want to hurt the feelings of those who are failing. Failure is not a bad thing. You learn the most when you fail. I had no response to John's post because it was some tangent he slide off to, and had nothing to do with the conversation I thought we were having. He's either "on something" or has mental problems. I don't wish to engage him about it any further. '"John...(is) "on something" or has mental problems."' Indeed. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:49:55 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0500, John H. wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:34:46 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something. It is the ignorant who make up the Democrat party's base. Have you not come to that understanding yet? Democrats don't want the 'No Child Left Behind Act' to work because the thought of an educated population drives them up a wall. I really have no response for this, except to say that you seriously need a checkup from the neckup. You are not rational. Like I say, it drives you up a wall. -- John |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:01:46 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:53:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 9:34*am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 13, 8:53*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message m... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one paragraph. Completely ignoring the Wire fraud Mail fraud Money structuring Mann act and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges.. Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses. Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard. I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch. Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet). Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet they are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam... The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to win.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you cant;) Here's a bit from *my* local paper: Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings' By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01 NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising *Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes. With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time to make a smooth transition. - - - Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW, like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio.. ================= But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the shades while doing so. The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except Harry's. It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word "Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period.. stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good at that. If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK, where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican party position on something.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah salty, guess I am just ignorant, as is my wife, and my dad, and the list goes on.... Or how do you psudo-intellectuals put it, "uninformed"? I guess I should know all the political affiliation of all the governors around here as being from New York, he must be a dem, that goes without saying.. oh wait, can you say Bloomberg? I would have to agree with you! :') I was at a Montgomery conference in San Francisco years ago and Bloomberg was the keynote speaker. During his speech he worked in that it was likely he "was the only Democrat in the room." I didn't think the timing was right to leap to my feet but was damned impressed. He ran as a Republican because of the logjam of Democrats already positioned for endorsements. It was easy for him to run as a Republican in NY city since there existed such a dearth of intelligent Republicans that could begin to hold a candle to Bloomberg. Bloomberg may dress himself in Republican garb but he's a Dem at heart. jps |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:12:55 -0400, wrote: Like I say, it drives you up a wall. Think whatever you like. I'm done trying to have a conversation with a mental case. See ya. Yeah, you and Harry have all the right answers anyway. Bad night again, eh, Herring? On the attack first thing in the AM. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:34:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:12:55 -0400, wrote: Like I say, it drives you up a wall. Think whatever you like. I'm done trying to have a conversation with a mental case. See ya. Yeah, you and Harry have all the right answers anyway. That's impossible, as Harry and I differ on almost everything. Well pardon me, but it sure seemed like he was jumping on your bandwagon. But then again, he's ****ed 'cause I won't talk to him and keeps demonstrating that fact. snerk So, Herring, it's supposed to be in the high 60's today with calm winds. Why aren't you and that new boat heading out to the Bay? http://tinyurl.com/3e249n S winds 5 to 10 kt. Waves 1 to 2 ft. A slight chance of showers late in the afternoon. I unfortunately have to go to a 10 AM "bizness" meeting over in Fairfax County. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
HK wrote:
John H. wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:34:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:12:55 -0400, wrote: Like I say, it drives you up a wall. Think whatever you like. I'm done trying to have a conversation with a mental case. See ya. Yeah, you and Harry have all the right answers anyway. That's impossible, as Harry and I differ on almost everything. Well pardon me, but it sure seemed like he was jumping on your bandwagon. But then again, he's ****ed 'cause I won't talk to him and keeps demonstrating that fact. snerk So, Herring, it's supposed to be in the high 60's today with calm winds. Why aren't you and that new boat heading out to the Bay? Are you taking your 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat out of its slip and into the bay this afternoon? |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
|
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:34:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:12:55 -0400, wrote: Like I say, it drives you up a wall. Think whatever you like. I'm done trying to have a conversation with a mental case. See ya. Yeah, you and Harry have all the right answers anyway. That's impossible, as Harry and I differ on almost everything. Well pardon me, but it sure seemed like he was jumping on your bandwagon. But then again, he's ****ed 'cause I won't talk to him and keeps demonstrating that fact. -- John H |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Mar 14, 9:52*am, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:28:31 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:34:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:12:55 -0400, wrote: Like I say, it drives you up a wall. Think whatever you like. I'm done trying to have a conversation with a mental case. See ya. Yeah, you and Harry have all the right answers anyway. That's impossible, as Harry and I differ on almost everything. Well pardon me, but it sure seemed like he was jumping on your bandwagon. But then again, he's ****ed 'cause I won't talk to him and keeps demonstrating that fact. *snerk So, Herring, it's supposed to be in the high 60's today with calm winds.. Why aren't you and that new boat heading out to the Bay? Are you taking your 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat out of its slip and into the bay this afternoon? When he does take that boat out, there'll be a fireboat welcome for him in Annapolis Harbor. Hell, maybe the Navy Academy will have their fleet out also. I played Augustine Golf Course down in Stafford yesterday. Hard course, slope of 138 from the white tees. Needless to say, I didn't do well, but got a lot of exercise! Going to Myrtle Beach on Sunday for five 18-hole days. Should be fun. -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I've been asked to smoke the corned beef by almost all of the family this year!! I'm boiling one just to have cabbage potatoes and carrots with, then smoke one. |
More deception from the left and the useless MSM.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:28:31 -0400, BAR wrote:
HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:34:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:12:55 -0400, wrote: Like I say, it drives you up a wall. Think whatever you like. I'm done trying to have a conversation with a mental case. See ya. Yeah, you and Harry have all the right answers anyway. That's impossible, as Harry and I differ on almost everything. Well pardon me, but it sure seemed like he was jumping on your bandwagon. But then again, he's ****ed 'cause I won't talk to him and keeps demonstrating that fact. snerk So, Herring, it's supposed to be in the high 60's today with calm winds. Why aren't you and that new boat heading out to the Bay? Are you taking your 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat out of its slip and into the bay this afternoon? When he does take that boat out, there'll be a fireboat welcome for him in Annapolis Harbor. Hell, maybe the Navy Academy will have their fleet out also. I played Augustine Golf Course down in Stafford yesterday. Hard course, slope of 138 from the white tees. Needless to say, I didn't do well, but got a lot of exercise! Going to Myrtle Beach on Sunday for five 18-hole days. Should be fun. -- John H |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com