![]() |
Letter from Florida teacher
wrote in message ... On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:25:44 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: The biggest weapon in the terrorists arsenal? Poverty and hunger. People who are destitute and hungry with no hope are very easy to recruit. They will go along with anyone who comes to them with the answers to their immediate problems. If we had spent the money already wasted on this idiotic and futile "War on Terror" building houses, schools and hospitals and feeding people's families, 3000 of our soldiers would still be alive and home with their families. Instead, they are ripe for the picking when the terrorists come calling, looking for anyone who wants someone to care about them. I respect your POV, however I am afraid you are dreaming. We are facing thousands of years of religious indoctrination and beliefs. Poverty and hunger aren't part of the equation. I think you are making the mistake of judging Islamic fundamentalism through the filters of western culture. Eisboch |
Letter from Florida teacher
|
Letter from Florida teacher
|
Letter from Florida teacher
wrote in message ... On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:53:14 -0400, salty wrote: The biggest weapon in the terrorists arsenal? I'm starting to suspect *we* are. People forget, as recently as 20 years ago, Iraq was a prosperous, secular, non-terrorist state, and our ally to boot. Now look at it. Iran was a budding democracy, until our very own CIA, overthrew Mossadegh. Now look at it. Poverty and hunger. People who are destitute and hungry with no hope are very easy to recruit. They will go along with anyone who comes to them with the answers to their immediate problems. If we had spent the money already wasted on this idiotic and futile "War on Terror" building houses, schools and hospitals and feeding people's families, 3000 of our soldiers would still be alive and home with their families. Instead, they are ripe for the picking when the terrorists come calling, looking for anyone who wants someone to care about them. For sure, we wouldn't be worse off. Radical Islam is a small percentage of Islam. We paint all of Islam with the same brush, at our peril. Didn't you just do the same thing? "Iran" does not represent radical Islamic fundamentalism. It's a country with policies we may support or disagree with. The threat to us was demonstrated on 9/11. Eisboch |
Letter from Florida teacher
"HK" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:23:59 -0400, " wrote: Negotiation. That's the ticket. Right Harry? Better than running in circles for the next, what, 1000 years, blowing our national treasure, human and otherwise, on a stupid, useless war that only pays off for corporate interests. Harry, are you seriously suggesting that we "negotiate" a solution with the leaders of Islamic fundamentalism, including bin Laden? Good grief. Eisboch |
Letter from Florida teacher
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:23:59 -0400, " wrote: Negotiation. That's the ticket. Right Harry? Better than running in circles for the next, what, 1000 years, blowing our national treasure, human and otherwise, on a stupid, useless war that only pays off for corporate interests. Harry, are you seriously suggesting that we "negotiate" a solution with the leaders of Islamic fundamentalism, including bin Laden? Good grief. Eisboch Of course not, but I am suggesting that waging "military war" for the next 1000 years is equally idiotic. The war against religious fundamentalism is not going to be won via militarism. |
Letter from Florida teacher
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:23:59 -0400, " wrote: Negotiation. That's the ticket. Right Harry? Better than running in circles for the next, what, 1000 years, blowing our national treasure, human and otherwise, on a stupid, useless war that only pays off for corporate interests. Harry, are you seriously suggesting that we "negotiate" a solution with the leaders of Islamic fundamentalism, including bin Laden? Good grief. Eisboch Of course not, but I am suggesting that waging "military war" for the next 1000 years is equally idiotic. The war against religious fundamentalism is not going to be won via militarism. Every Muslim man, woman and child is a soldier in the war of bringing the infidels into Islam or terminating their existence. |
Letter from Florida teacher
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Harry, are you seriously suggesting that we "negotiate" a solution with the leaders of Islamic fundamentalism, including bin Laden? Good grief. Eisboch Of course not, but I am suggesting that waging "military war" for the next 1000 years is equally idiotic. The war against religious fundamentalism is not going to be won via militarism. Well, I agree that the war may not be won, but the physical attacks on this country may be controlled. Eisboch |
Letter from Florida teacher
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:23:59 -0400, "
wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Win *yet*? You don't really think we are going to put down the Islamists, do you. The ones that have sworn to Allah to kill you, me, our wives, kids, families, neighborhoods? Those? You betcha. Eisboch Yeah, how? They're in 50 different countries. It is not going to happen via military action. Negotiation. That's the ticket. Right Harry? Are you running for 'liberal'? -- John H |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com