On Mar 12, 4:30*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:15:33 -0500, John H. wrote:
Remember how FOX labeled Mark Foley a Democrat? *At least omitting party
affiliation is more fair than labeling him a republican.....

bull****

What's BS?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-th...oreilly-factor...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/10/4/142948/585

Well, the Huffington post got one part right, it was a mistake made
during one broadcast. but as usual the rest of the article is
bull****, as it was immediately corrected the next night, and removed
from further broadcasts.. so it is really a lie, taken out of context,
something the Huffington Post specializes in.. Remember, they are the
ones that said it was great that Tony Snow had cancer, it served him
right.. they never corrected that...

As to the daily Kos.. about as legit as the New York Lies and the
National Enquirer...

So the bottom line, is it is Bull****...

On Mar 12, 6:14*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:02:33 -0400, "John" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:49:12 -0400, "John" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:08:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie
is
Here wrote:

While all the news have reported on all the dark clouds surrounding
Spitzer's indiscretions, *ABC has managed to find the silver lining..
Spitzer was an excellent tipper.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4432335&page=1

Note how often his party affiliation is mentioned in that article. Then
imagine if he were a Republican.
--
John

Remember how FOX labeled Mark Foley a Democrat? *At least omitting party
affiliation is more fair than labeling him a republican.....

bull****
--
John

Here ya go john the actual footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_vtC98IFoA

Bull**** on you....

Color me wrong.

My apologies!
--
John- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, what is bull**** is the dishonest way which it was reported..

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:02:33 -0400, "John" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:49:12 -0400, "John" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:08:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie
is
Here wrote:

While all the news have reported on all the dark clouds surrounding
Spitzer's indiscretions, ABC has managed to find the silver lining.
Spitzer was an excellent tipper.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4432335&page=1

Note how often his party affiliation is mentioned in that article. Then
imagine if he were a Republican.
--
John

Remember how FOX labeled Mark Foley a Democrat? At least omitting party
affiliation is more fair than labeling him a republican.....


bull****
--
John

Here ya go john the actual footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_vtC98IFoA

Bull**** on you....


Color me wrong.

My apologies!
--
John

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:25:45 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Mar 12, 6:14*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:02:33 -0400, "John" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:49:12 -0400, "John" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:08:46 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie
is
Here wrote:

While all the news have reported on all the dark clouds surrounding
Spitzer's indiscretions, *ABC has managed to find the silver lining.
Spitzer was an excellent tipper.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4432335&page=1

Note how often his party affiliation is mentioned in that article. Then
imagine if he were a Republican.
--
John

Remember how FOX labeled Mark Foley a Democrat? *At least omitting party
affiliation is more fair than labeling him a republican.....

bull****
--
John

Here ya go john the actual footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_vtC98IFoA

Bull**** on you....

Color me wrong.

My apologies!
--
John- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, what is bull**** is the dishonest way which it was reported..

True. But I was wrong in thinking the mistake hadn't happened.

For the major media to not mention that Spitzer is a Democrat is no
mistake. NBC, tonight, when reporting his resignation still didn't mention
that he was a Democrat.

But they did mention that the new Lt. Gov. would be a Republican, and then
went into his approval ratings. One must wonder...
--
John