Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message . .. HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I've been looking around for a new anti-virus/spyware/firewall provider as I'm highly dissatisfied with the Norton products - not so much on the technical end, but their incessant begging for renewal starting two months before the license is up. I stumbled into AVG on the recommendation of a friend. She says it works great and prefers it to Norton by a factor of 10. Anybody else use it? I'm leaning towards AVG, but just want another opinion. I had it installed on my mothers computer, and she never got a virus, but she is a low risk user. I changed from AVG to Avast when she purchased a new computer due to a better review in one of the magazines I read. AVG and Avast are both considered light weight, small footprint AV and do a fair job of catching virus, but might be slow to update databases with new viruses. Kaspersky Anti-Virus has been the highest rated, and is priced similar to Norton. I used McAfee because it is free from my ISP. It has a large footprint, but does a great job. Even AVG "light" updates its virii database every day on my laptop. I am basing my evalution on it's ability to catch the most current virus, based upon the reviews by experts. You can still update your antivirus database daily, and still not catch the latest variation of viruses. The reviews i have read concerning AVG and Avast, (and I have installed both of them), is they are good free programs but "scored poorly when compared to Kaspersky and NOD32". *Every* anti-virus program or suite has its own set of problems, including Kaspersky, which I also have used from time to time. And I didn't read *that* on the internet or in a magazine article "based upon the reviews by experts." Well, you are probably correct on this and all subjects, and it was really silly of me to use the advice of those who specialize in the field. Reggie, you are a pretty bright fellow. I'm sure you can find other ways to amuse yourself. Wouldn't you like to see a new and improved Harry emerge out of all of this? There is no "new and improved" Harry emerging. If the attacks aimed at me and others here cease, then I will stop throwing them back. I will admit to having no tolerance for those who toss spitballs and then hide behind their anonymity, or those who criticize the boats, motors, trailers, or gear of others, but aren't manly enough to put into play what boats, motors, trailers, or gear they possess. Know any posters like that? :} The volley has to stop somewhere. And it isn't necessarily have to be at the servers feet. Anonymity is a defense mechanism against any number of real and perceived threats. I don't think it's manly at all to make public, details about your life that might draw the attention of unsavory characters. That is just poor judgment. I will support any legitimate efforts to clean this place up. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|